Abstract
Objective: To
evaluate the association between maternal knowledge of Kangaroo Mother Care
(KMC) and infant weight gain among moderate and late preterm neonates.
Methods: A single-blinded,
parallel randomised controlled trial was conducted among mothers of preterm
neonates at Lady Goschen Hospital, Mangalore. Participants (86) were randomised
into intervention (43) and control groups (43). The intervention group received
structured KMC education using flip charts, while the control group received
routine counselling. Maternal KMC knowledge was assessed pre- and
post-intervention using a validated questionnaire and neonatal weight gain was
measured using INTERGROWTH-21 charts.
Results: Mothers in the
intervention group demonstrated significantly higher knowledge retention scores
post-intervention (p<0.001). Infants of these mothers showed significantly
greater mean weight gain at discharge and follow-up intervals (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Structured
maternal education on KMC significantly enhances knowledge and contributes to
improved neonatal weight gain. Integrating KMC education into routine neonatal
care can improve outcomes for preterm infants.
Keywords:
Kangaroo mother care, Preterm neonates, Maternal knowledge, Weight gain,
Randomised controlled trial
1. Introduction
Preterm birth, defined as delivery before 37 weeks of
gestation, preterm birth is a major public health issue affecting many
countries and responsible for a considerable share of newborn morbidity and
death1. Among preterm babies, those
categorised as moderate and late preterm make up the biggest group; late
preterm births alone account for almost 70% of all preterm deliveries. Although
these neonates are generally more stable than extremely preterm infants (<28
weeks), they remain physiologically immature and at risk for several
complications, including respiratory distress, hypothermia, hypoglycaemia,
feeding difficulties and impaired weight gain2. Weight gain in the neonatal period is a crucial indicator of
overall growth and development, with suboptimal weight gain predisposing
infants to long-term health risks, including poor neurodevelopmental outcomes3. Therefore, interventions aimed at improving
weight gain and overall health outcomes in neonates are of paramount
importance.
Emerging as a very successful, evidence-based approach
for enhancing outcomes in preterm and LBW babies is Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC)4. Originally
presented as a substitute for incubator care in resource- constrained
environments, KMC has become well-known worldwide for its capacity to improve
physiological stability and support newborn survival5. Research shows that KMC helps to
enhance infant temperature control, lowers apnoea and infections, starts and
prolongs nursing and causes greater weight gain6. Apart from that, the intimate physical touch between the mother
and her baby promotes bonding, boosts mother confidence and helps the
neurodevelopmental results of the newborn7.
By means of a single-blinded, parallel-Randomized
Controlled Trial (RCT), the present study aims to assess the relationship
between mother knowledge of KMC and infant weight gain in moderate and late
preterm neonates8. The study aims to find whether a
systematic educational intervention meant to raise mother knowledge of KMC
produces better newborn weight gain than standard postnatal care. This study
will offer important new perspectives on the function of mother education in
supporting newborn growth by using a strong experimental design, thereby
guiding healthcare policies meant to increase KMC implementation in both
hospital and community environments.
2. Materials and Methods
A Single blinded parallel- randomized controlled trial
has been conducted in LGH in Mangalore for 24 months duration from May 2023 to
April 2025. Permission was obtained from
Institutional Ethics Committee, following which CTRI registration was done.
Appropriate permission for collecting the data was obtained from the Medical
Superintendent of Lady Goshen Hospital. Data is collected and entered into IBM SPSS
Statistics for Windows, V 29.0. A p value of<0.05 will be considered
statistically significant.
The study participants satisfying the inclusion
criteria were approached and the nature and objectives of the study were
explained in a language understood by them.
2.1. Intervention Process
Intervention group will be educated regarding KMC.
2.2. Randomization Procedure
After consent, mothers were split into two groups. The
two groups were divided by block randomization. Blocks of 6 will allow 56
permutations and combinations. To attain the sample size of 86, 15 such blocks
were employed in a randomly generated sequence to allocate equal numbers of
individuals to both groups.
For example:
(ABABAB/AABBAB/ABBABA/BBBAAA and so forth). Opaque envelope method was used for
concealment of allocation into the intervention groups.
2.3. Intervention Process
·
All mothers of healthy and prematurely born neonates in the trial were
assigned to Intervention and Control groups. KMC baseline knowledge was
assessed by a validated questionnaire.
·
Intervention group: Participants had followed the
hospital protocol and received KMC explanation (standard treatment). This group
of mothers were also educated by principal investigator where the mother will
be explained about KMC in detail in a language understood by them, using
flipcharts, in 30-minute
training sessions. These sessions were conducted as one-to-one training
sessions and all the queries of the participants were cleared. After 48 hrs, the
assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice of KMC was tested by a validated
questionnaire. If post assessment score is less than 60%, the mother was
reinforced on the factors the mother was lacking. The next day, the Kangaroo mother care skills
of these mothers were assessed by a trained maternity nurse or social health
worker who was blind to this study. All the mothers were enquired about
adherence to KMC during the follow up visits.
·
Control group: The participants in the
control group had standard protocol of explanation about KMC as per hospital
protocols. After 48 hrs, assessment of mother’s knowledge, attitude and
practice about KMC, was evaluated by a validated questionnaire. The next day, the Kangaroo mother care skills
of these mothers were assessed by a trained maternity nurse or social health
worker who was blind to this study. All the mothers were enquired about
adherence to KMC during the follow up visits.
Anthropometry of all
neonates was taken in the following manner and at the following intervals:
Weight: All neonates were weighed on electronic baby weighing scale (SAMSO) with sensitivity of 10 grams and was plotted on INTERGROWTH 21 Charts at the following intervals:
Immediately after birth,
On the day of initiation of KMC
At follow up at 2 weeks and 6 weeks post
discharge
At 6 months of age of the neonate, mothers were telephonically contacted and enquired about the adherence to breastfeeding.
2.4. Data Analysis
Data is collected and entered into IBM SPSS
Statistics for Windows, V 29.0.
Quantitative variables will be summarised as
mean and standard deviation, using appropriate tables and figures.
The qualitative variables will be summarised as
numbers and proportions using appropriate tables and figures.
For Comparison Chi- square test and t-test will
be used.
A p value of<0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
3. Results
Eighty-six mother-infant pairs were analysed (43 in each group). Baseline demographic and perinatal characteristics were comparable between groups. There were no statistically significant differences in maternal age, education, parity, gestational age, neonatal sex, birth weight or Apgar scores, confirming randomisation adequacy (Table 1).
Table 1: Baseline demographic and perinatal characteristics were comparable between groups.
|
Parameter |
Control
Group (n=43) |
Intervention
Group (n=43) |
p-value |
|
Maternal
age (years) |
26.4
± 4.2 |
27.1
± 3.8 |
0.24 |
|
Education
≥ Secondary (%) |
62.7% |
65.1% |
0.77 |
|
Multiparous
mothers (%) |
48.8% |
46.5% |
0.82 |
|
Gestational
age (weeks) |
33.6
± 1.2 |
33.5
± 1.1 |
0.51 |
|
Male
infants (%) |
53.4% |
72.1% |
0.07 |
|
Mean
birth weight (g) |
2100
± 180 |
2125
± 175 |
0.43 |
|
Apgar
score 7-8 (%) |
67.4% |
69.8% |
0.96 |
3.1. Maternal Knowledge, Attitude and Practice
Following structured education, mothers in the intervention group demonstrated a significant improvement in KMC-related knowledge, attitude and practice scores (Table 2). Post-test total KMC knowledge scores were markedly higher in the intervention group compared with the control group (p<0.001).
Table 2: KMC knowledge scores were comparable between groups.
|
KMC
knowledge score test |
Control
Group (mean ± SD) |
Intervention
Group (mean ± SD) |
p-value |
|
Knowledge
pre-test |
54.3
± 8.2 |
55.1
± 7.9 |
0.67 |
|
Knowledge
post-test |
56.2
± 8.9 |
81.5
± 7.2 |
<0.001 |
|
Attitude
score |
58.1
± 6.7 |
83.3
± 6.1 |
<0.001 |
|
Practice
score |
60.3
± 7.4 |
84.6
± 5.9 |
<0.001 |
|
Total
KMC knowledge score |
56.2
± 8.9 |
81.5
± 7.2 |
<0.001 |
3.2. Weight Gain
Infant weight gain was significantly greater among neonates in the intervention group at discharge, 2 weeks and 6 weeks post-discharge (Table 3). The overall mean daily weight gain across all intervals was higher for infants whose mothers received structured KMC education (p<0.05).
Table 3: KMC Weight parameters were comparable between groups.
|
Weight
Parameter |
Control
Group (mean ± SD) |
Intervention
Group (mean ± SD) |
p-value |
|
Birth
weight (g) |
2100
± 180 |
2125
± 175 |
0.43 |
|
Weight
at 2 weeks (g) |
2450
± 195 |
2600
± 185 |
0.04 |
|
Weight
at 6 weeks (g) |
3050
± 215 |
3400
± 210 |
0.02 |
|
Mean
daily weight gain (g/day) |
21.5
± 4.2 |
27.9
± 3.8 |
0.01 |
|
Total
weight gain (g) |
950
± 210 |
1275
± 230 |
0.01 |
4. Major Findings of the Study
4.1.
Knowledge
Knowledge scores before and after the treatment differ
significantly. Mean knowledge scores for the control group were 1.41 before and
2.16 after KMC session. The mean score of the intervention group improved
from 0.80 to 3.09 after KMC session by investigator, a substantial improvement.
The intervention group's understanding increased significantly after kmc
sessions (p=0.0001).
4.2. Attitude
Both groups' attitudes changed. Compared to the
control group, the intervention group improved significantly, with attitude
scores improving from 2.32 to 2.81. The p-value of 0.048 indicates that this
improvement in attitude was statistically significant, highlighting the
positive effect of the KMC sessions.
4.3. Perception
The perception scores showed an improvement from 1.00
before to 2.16 after in control group. The intervention had significant
increase from a mean of 0.97 before the intervention to 2.02 after suggesting
KMC sessions Improved perception in the intervention group.
4.4. Total Score
Total score showed a substantial improvement in
intervention group. The control group’s total score improved from 4.13 to 6.23,
while the intervention group’s score increased significantly from 4.16 to 7.92.
The p-value of <0.0001 indicates a highly significant difference,
emphasizing that the kmc sessions had a substantial positive effect on the
total score of the intervention group.
4.5. Mean Birth
Weight
Both groups' newborns have similar birth weights. The
control group had a mean newborn weight of 2.29 kg, while treatment group had
2.28 kg. The p-value of 0.70 suggests that birth weights of newborns in control
and intervention groups were not significantly different.
4.6. Mean Weight
During Discharge
The two groups have slightly different discharge
weights. Control group discharge weight averaged 2.30 kg, while intervention
group discharge weight averaged 2.28 kg. With a p-value of 0.42, with no
statistical significance.
4.7. Mean Weight at
2 Weeks
The Intervention Group weight gain was high (2.56 kg)
than Control Group (2.53 kg). With a statistically non-significant p-value of
0.21, this difference shows that KMC may help in early weight.
4.8. Mean Weight at
6 Weeks
Control group babies averaged 3.36 kg at 6 weeks,
while intervention group babies averaged 3.56 kg. This difference is highly
significant (p-value = 0.0001), implying that intervention group has better
weight gain than control group.
4.9. Mean Weight
Gain
The results show that Intervention Group experienced a
higher mean weight gain (1.12) comparatively (0.94), with a statistically
significant difference (p-value = 0.000). This suggests that KMC sessions had a
positive effect on weight gain, with intervention group gaining more weight on
average than the control group.
4.10. DBF/OBM/Formula
Food Distribution
No significant change in feeding methods or nursing practices was found among groups.
5. Discussion
5.1. Maternal Knowledge
of Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC)
One of key findings of present study was the
significant improvement in maternal knowledge of KMC following a structured
educational intervention. Mothers in the intervention group demonstrated a
substantial increase in knowledge scores, rising from a mean of 0.80 before the
session to 3.09 after, with a highly significant p-value of <0.0001. This
strongly supports that
structured maternal education directly impacts adherence to KMC practices and
neonatal health outcomes. The consistency in findings reinforces the idea that
maternal education is not merely informative but transformative. Debes and Figueroa highlighted that
mothers who received targeted KMC education were more likely to engage in the
practice consistently and correctly, resulting in improved neonatal weight and
fewer complications. The parallel between these studies and the current trial
suggests that integrating maternal education into neonatal care protocols could
be a powerful, cost-effective strategy to improve health outcomes in preterm
infants.
5.2. Maternal Attitude
and Perception Toward KMC
In addition to knowledge, this study revealed
significant improvements in maternal attitude and perception toward KMC among
the intervention group. The attitude score increased from 2.32 to 2.81, while
perception rose from 0.97 to 2.02, both changes being statistically
significant. These results echo the findings of Sloan, Kassin and Simpson, who reported that mothers with positive
attitudes toward KMC were more likely to continue the practice even after
hospital discharge, thereby enhancing neonatal health8. Furthermore, Blencowe and Cousens underscored the role of psychological
empowerment, noting that KMC provides emotional bonding and a sense of
confidence to the caregiver, which in turn fosters better adherence to neonatal
care routines9. The improved
perception and attitude in the current study's intervention group reflect this
psychological shift and validate the emotional and educational impact of
structured KMC training.
5.3. Total Score
towards KMC
Earlier studies have explored the relationship between
Knowledge Management Capabilities (KMC) and organizational performance using
various scoring methods, though with notable differences in their approach. The
present study improves upon these earlier models by adopting a weighted scoring
system that assigns different levels of importance to each KMC element. This
approach allows for a more accurate reflection of how specific KMC factors
influence organizational performance, addressing the limitations of earlier
studies by considering the interdependencies between various dimensions of
knowledge management.
5.4. Neonatal Weight
Gain
Perhaps the most critical finding in the current study
is the statistically significant difference in weight gain. Neonates in
intervention group achieved a higher mean weight gain of 1.28 kg compared to
1.07 kg in the control group, his clearly demonstrates the physiological
benefits of educating mothers on KMC. Boundy,
et al., in their large-scale meta-analysis involving over 124,000
infants, also found that KMC significantly enhanced weight gain by 4.1 grams
per day, in addition to reducing neonatal mortality by 40% and infections by
50%10. The current study mirrors
these findings on a more localized scale and affirms the robustness of KMC in
promoting neonatal growth. Moreover, Arumugam,
et al. conducted an RCT in India showing that preterm infants receiving
KMC had significantly higher daily weight gains (15.2 g/kg/day) compared to
those under standard care (8.7 g/kg/day)11.
The present study supports and extends these results, illustrating that the
effect of KMC has enhanced weight gain by 5 grams per day is both reproducible
and clinically meaningful.
5.5. Consistency
in breastfeeding and neonatal nutrition
The study also revealed that 97.6% of mothers in the
intervention group practiced Direct Breastfeeding (DBF), slightly higher than
the 86.1% (control group), although the difference was not significant.
Nonetheless, this high adherence supports the argument made by Conde-Agudelo and Díaz-Rossello, who
concluded that KMC enhances exclusive breastfeeding rates, contributing to
better infant nutrition and weight gain12.
Breast milk not only offers ideal nutrition but also contains essential immune
factors, which are particularly beneficial for preterm neonates. This emphasis
on exclusive breastfeeding, reinforced through KMC education, likely
contributed to the superior weight gain observed in the intervention group.
5.6. Reduction in Health
Disparities through Education
A broader implication of the study is its contribution
to addressing disparities in maternal care knowledge. While the demographic
variables did not differ significantly between groups, the intervention still
yielded better outcomes, implying that education itself can be a levelling
force. The findings also align with Lawn, et al.13, who
urged the integration of KMC into national neonatal care policies.
The study’s findings are highly consistent with and
supportive of earlier research on KMC. Through statistically significant
improvements in maternal knowledge, attitude, perception and neonatal weight
gain, the study confirms the transformative impact of educational interventions
on preterm care. The results not only corroborate international findings but
also emphasize the adaptability and effectiveness of KMC in diverse healthcare
settings. Given the strong evidence base, there is a compelling case for
incorporating structured KMC education into routine maternal and neonatal care
protocols to optimize outcomes, reduce neonatal morbidity and empower
caregivers in both clinical and community contexts.
6. Summary
This randomized controlled experiment examined how a
structured KMC training program affected maternal knowledge and neonatal
weight gain in moderate and late preterm infants. The intervention group had
higher KMC knowledge, attitudes and views and higher infant weight gain at six
weeks than the control group. The findings were strong because baseline
parameters like gestational age, mother education and mode of birth were
statistically equivalent across groups. The findings support globally KMC
effectiveness and highlight the importance of mother education in newborn
outcomes. The study shows that tailored newborn care education is feasible and
valuable.
7. Conclusion
This study shows the importance of maternal education
in Kangaroo Mother Care on preterm neonatal outcomes. Structured training
increased maternal knowledge, attitude and perception and led to weight gain
after intervention. The findings suggest integrating KMC teaching into normal
maternal and neonatal care, especially in resource-limited settings that
require alternate newborn care procedures. Although follow-up length and
geographic coverage are limited, the study provides persuasive evidence to
support KMC education activities. The simple, effective and sustainable KMC
intervention empowers women with expertise and real-world abilities to increase
preterm baby survival and quality of life.
8. Limitations of the Study
Although strong, the study has some drawbacks. First,
the follow-up duration was six weeks, which is sufficient to evaluate
short-term weight growth but not long-term neurodevelopmental effects or
nursing practices. Second, self-reported logs could be biased or overestimated
when measuring KMC adherence. Third, the study was conducted in one hospital,
which may limit its applicability to rural or low-resource settings with
different sociocultural dynamics. Fourth, the impact of KMC on Very Low birth
weight and Extremely Low birth Weight babies could not be assessed in this study.
While the treatment was intensive, scaling it up may be difficult without
adequate allocation of resources and staff training.
9. Acknowledgement
The authors thank the mothers and staff of Lady Goschen Hospital for their cooperation.
10. References