6360abefb0d6371309cc9857
Abstract
Melanoma is a
malignancy arising from the melanocytes. Australia has the highest melanoma
rates in the world; real data show one Australian will be diagnosed with
melanoma this year. Many British expatriates live and work in Australia.
Awareness of commonly occurring anatomy locations for melanoma should be taught
during patient education in dermatology clinics. Multiple theories of etiology
exist, however, most notably is the BRAF mutation occurring primarily in the
BRAF gene, which leads to uncontrolled cell signaling and proliferation,
potentially driving melanoma development. Scientists have developed targeted
therapies for the most common BRAF mutation, known as BRAF V600E mutation which
represents a replacement of valine(V) for glutamic acid(E). This article will
look at the risk factors, diagnostic accuracy, prognostic factors for cutaneous
melanoma such as Breslow’s depth; a measurement used to determine the depth of
a melanoma tumor’s invasion into the skin. And a review of local recurrence
rates for primary melanoma indicates that there needs to be further research.
Previous research has focused on melanoma-related deaths associated with a
Breslow thickness threshold larger than 0.7mm – 0.75mm.
Daily sun protection
cream or lotion is recommended for young people aged 20- 30years especially for
UVA and UVB radiation related leisure activities, people with Fitzpatrick skin
type I-III aged 70 years and above, people living in the tropics and frequent
travellers and expatriates to the tropics. High-risk patients also need
self-directed assessments of irregular and changing moles on the skin through
use of physician approved mobile apps.
Keywords: Cutaneous melanoma; Melanoma staging; Dermoscopy; Skin
cancer; Immunotherapy
Introduction
Most melanomas are
caused by the sun. In fact, one UK study found that about 86 %of melanomas can
be attributed to exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun1,2. 5-year survival among patients with localized
melanoma is greater than 99%, whereas 5-year survival for those with distant or
metastatic melanoma falls to 35%. These numbers are based on people diagnosed
with melanoma between 2014 and 2020 in the United States. Similarly, 5-year
survival among patients with localized squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is 95%,
whereas 5-year survival for those with regional SCC decreases to 58%3. Accurate screening for skin cancer coupled with
earlier diagnosis can optimize outcomes, minimize the number of invasive
diagnostic procedures for benign lesions (skin biopsy), avoid associated
morbidities and reduce health care costs4,5. Using the naked eye is the current standard of care
for skin cancer examination and histopathologic testing remains the gold
standard for skin cancer diagnosis4,5.
Methods
Data extraction was performed by a reviewer,
with verification by a second reviewer. A mixed-effects model was used in the
data analysis. Data analyses were performed from May 2022 to December 20235.
Results
According to a
meta-analysis of 100 studies found that using dermoscopy compared with clinical
examination substantially improved diagnostic accuracy for melanoma (relative
odds ratio [ROR], 5.7) and for keratinocyte cancer (ROR, 2.5). Sensitivity and
specificity using clinical examination and images of melanoma were 76.9% and
89.1% for experienced dermatologists compared with 78.3% and 66.2% for
inexperienced dermatologists and 37.5% and 84.6% for primary care physicians;
using in-person dermoscopy and dermoscopic images, they were 85.7% and 81.3%
for experienced dermatologists, 78.0% and 69.5% for inexperienced
dermatologists and 49.5% and 91.3% for Primary care physicians.5 These results
were statistically significant.
Discussion
Melanoma is a
malignant tumor of melanocytes, which are the cells that make the pigment
melanin and are derived from the neural crest. Although most melanomas arise in
the skin, they may also arise from mucosal surfaces or at other sites to which
neural crest cells migrate, including the uveal tract. Uveal melanomas differ
significantly from cutaneous melanoma in incidence, prognostic factors,
molecular characteristics and treatment. The thickness of the tumor (Breslow's
depth) is the most important factor. Deeper tumors have a higher risk of
metastasis. A review of the histology of an excised right thigh In-situ
melanoma showed a peripheral depth of 1. 6mm and a deep depth of 4.8 mm, an
ellipse of skin measuring 38 x13 x 9 mm on macroscopy. Microscopically, the
skin specimen showed post -surgical changes only, no residual malignancy was
seen. Although there is no Current standard guidance for excision margins for
stage 0 or in situ melanoma, consensus margins recommend margins of at least
5mm for stage 0 melanoma, with a goal of achieving microscopically negative
margins. However, 5 mm margins may be inadequate for some cases of in-situ
melanoma and wider margins may be required6,7. Skin cancer is the
most common malignancy diagnosed in the United States8. According to a
cohort study in New South Wales, Australia, the analysis included a cohort of
144 447 Australian patients diagnosed with thin (T1) primary invasive melanomas
(≤1.0 mm), consisting of 111 584 from the AIHW and 32 863 from the NSW-CanDLe
initiative.9 The most common primary melanoma site was the trunk (36.3%)
followed by the upper limbs (24.4%) and the lower limbs (22.1%)9.
A study identified
Acral and cutaneous melanoma tissue microarray with 32 samples from patients
with acral melanoma and 14 samples from patients with cutaneous melanoma. 90%
of acral samples and 57.1% of cutaneous samples were positive for HOXB13. Acral
tumours staining positively for HOX13 included both primary (8 out of 9) and
metastatic (19 out of 21) samples, indicating that positional identity might be
retained at distant metastatic sites10. The study was
hinged on the Anatomic location which determines oncogenic specificity in
melanoma.
Risk Factors
A
systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies and 21 risk prediction models
Carried out at the Melanoma institute of Australia, discovered the need to
identify the best performing risk prediction model for sentinel lymph nodes
biopsy positivity in melanoma17.
Twenty-one risk prediction models were identified encompassing a collective
168000 model development patients. A total of 15 unique predictor variables
were identified, of which the most utilized was the Breslow depth (15 studies),
followed by ulceration (14 studies), age (12 studies), Clark level (8 studies),
mitoses (8 studies) and anatomic location of the primary melanoma (7 studies)11-16.
What is the role of climate in melanoma virulence?
There is a staggering lack of
meta-analyses or systematic reviews that examine the relationship between
climate change and skin cancer. Climate change is a dynamic phenomenon that is
anticipated to have adverse effects on human health, including skin cancer20. Particularly, melanomas are the
deadliest form of skin cancer and 65%-90% of melanomas are attributed to UV
radiation21.
It was estimated that some 59 000
(65%) of about 92000 melanomas that occurred worldwide in 1985 were caused by
sun exposure21.
People who have benign sun damage in the skin are more likely to develop a skin
cancer than those who do not. Incidence of skin cancer in some populations has
been observed to fall in a temporal pattern consistent with an effect of
increasing efforts to control sun exposure on skin cancer risk22. Several factors affect human
exposure to UV radiation, including latitude, altitude and behaviours related
to occupational and leisure activities23.
Previous studies that examined the
relationship between shift work and skin cancer risk have provided inconclusive
results. However, occupation such as shift work have been studied to be
associated with increased incidence of melanoma. A study defined shift work as
working between 1:00 AM and 2:00 AM for at least 6 months24. Based on the literature,
individuals who practice outdoor sport-related activities receive high
ultraviolet radiation exposure, have a high risk for skin cancer, have a high
prevalence for pigmented lesions and may benefit from electronic sun protection
educational interventions25. Behaviors related to temperature and exposure to UV radiation and
occurrence of skin cancer have also been researched relatively frequently and
have been identified as an important determinant of skin cancer incidence in
the context of climate change, a factor that may increase risk and a key
potentially modifiable risk factor26.
Melanoma and skin types
Screening detection for all US
adults >70 years old with Fitzpatrick skin type I-III (Hartman et Al 2020).
Dermatologist usually perform Total body skin examination TBSE for detecting
incidental skin cancer in higher- risk patients. In low resource countries,
this approach to early diagnosis may identify in situ melanoma in the early
stages and address the problem of healthcare cost if this is done annually. A
large portion of Literature show that regular and consistent use of sun
protection factors 30 or 50 can prevent the risk of developing melanoma, other
skin cancers like squamos cell carcinoma SCC and effective in reducing the
number of moles acquired in early life, which are a risk marker for melanoma30. Sunscreen should be applied
generously and frequently and is recommended for young people aged 20- 30years
especially for UV radiation related leisure activities, people with Fitzpatrick
skin type I-III aged 70 years and above, people living in the tropics and
frequent Travellers and expatriates to the tropics.
What is the diagnostic
accuracy for melanoma?
What does a melanoma look like?
As majority of people often detect skin cancer at the later stages, it is
worthwhile to educate on the subtle skin changes associated with melanoma. Most
malignant changes occur gradually and increase in size and diameter over time.
Most patients we have had consultations with have described dry white skin
changes around the periphery of the suspected melanoma. It is non-tender, brown
colour and non-pruritic. As a rule, patients should look out for changing mole
or ‘ugly duckling’ mole that looks different in size and diameter from other
benign moles on the body. A cohort study conducted by Kaiser Permanente
Northern California of 59,279 primary care patients demonstrated that a
store-and-forward tele dermatology workflow involving capture of
high-resolution dermoscopic images and image retrieval to a large computer
monitor (in contrast to a smartphone screen) was associated with a greater
probability of cancer detection despite fewer face-to-face visits compared to
direct referral (Marwaha et al., 2019).
• A is for Asymmetry: One half of a mole or birthmark does not match the other.
• B is for Border: The edges are irregular, ragged, notched or blurred.
• C is for Color: The color is not the same all over and may include different shades of brown or black or sometimes with patches of pink, red, white or blue.
• D is for Diameter: The spot is larger than 6 millimeters across (about ¼ inch – the size of a pencil eraser), although melanomas can sometimes be smaller than this.
• E is for Evolving: The mole is changing in size, shape or color.
American Joint
Committee on Cancer (AJCC) recommended the following TNM criteria for primary
tumour staging in 201828.
a. T1: ≤1 mm (a: <0.8 mm without ulceration; b <0.8 mm with ulceration or 0.8-1 mm with or without ulceration)
b. T2: 1.1 to 2 mm (a: without ulceration; b: with ulceration)
c. T3: 2.1 to 4 mm (a: without ulceration; b: with ulceration)
d. T4: >4 mm (a: without ulceration; b: with ulceration)
e. N - Nodal involvement. detected in lymph nodes next to the main site where the melanoma was found.
f. M - Metastasis. measures spread of the tumor to distant body sites.
Immunotherapy drugs enhance the immune system’s ability to fight cancer; they are used to treat melanoma.
• atezolizumab: blocks the interaction between programmed cell death protein 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on immune cells.
• interleukin-2: IL-2 binds to IL-2 receptors (IL-2R), which are expressed by melanoma cells, triggering a cascade of events that may lead to the death of cancer cells. It was the first immunotherapy approved for metastatic melanoma.
• ipilimumab binds to CTLA-4, preventing it from interacting with its ligands, CD80 and CD86.
• nivolumab specifically binds to the PD-1 receptor on T cells thereby prevents it from interacting with its ligands, programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed cell death ligand 2 (PD-L2).
• pembrolizumab works by blocking PD-1 receptor on T cells, this inhibition allows T cells to resume their anti-tumor activity.
• Relatlimab works by blocking the Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) pathway. This prevents LAG-3 from interacting with its ligands, thus blocking the inhibitory signal and allowing T cells to become more active.
Targeted therapies which specifically target cancer cells, are used to treat melanoma include:
• binimetinib, trametinib targets and blocks MEK1 and MEK2 proteins that are part of the MAPK/ERK signalling pathway. In melanoma, the MAPK/ERK pathway is overactive due to mutations in the BRAF gene.
• cobimetinib, also targets and blocks the activity of MEK (MAPK/ERK kinase) proteins and is often used in combination with a BRAF inhibitor e.g vemurafenib.
• dabrafenib selectively inhibits the BRAF kinase, which is a key enzyme in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway.
• encorafenib specifically targets the BRAF V600E mutation, which is a common genetic alteration found in many cancer cells, including melanoma. This mutation leads to a constitutively activated BRAF kinase, driving uncontrolled cell growth.
• vemurafenib also competitively binds to the ATP-binding site of BRAF V600E kinase, preventing its activation.
Vaccine therapy is a
cancer treatment that uses a substance or group of substances to stimulate the
immune system to find the tumour and kill it. It is currently being studied in
the treatment of stage III melanoma that can be cured by surgical removal.
Recurrence
The results of a
European, multicenter, randomized trial compared margins of 2cm (n=161) versus
5cm (n=165) in 326 patients with primary melanomas with a thickness of 2.1mm or
less. The study included 141 patients with melanomas measuring 1mm or less17,18. There was no statistically significant difference
in 10-year Disease-free survival DFS or overall survival OS between the 2
groups. Local recurrence occurred in 1 patient treated with a 2 cm margin and 4
patients treated with 5cm margins17,18.
DecisionDx-melanoma uses gene expression profiling [GEP] test to empower
patients to make more informed decisions. A study identified
DecisionDx-melanoma provided significant and independent risk stratification of
patients with cutaneous melanoma, beyond American Joint committee on cancer
Eighth edition (AJCC8) stage, which may help inform more personalized patient
management decisions31.
The limitation of
DecisionDx-melanoma is that it provides personalized results for patients with
stage I-III cutaneous melanoma. There still needs to be further research to add
to the studies on local recurrence of cutaneous melanoma.
Conclusion
Total body photography and
sequential digital dermoscopic imaging may be considered for selected high-risk
patients, but cost and variable patient adherence with follow-up are barriers
to use; long-term lesion follow-up is best conducted by dermatologists27. Physician-directed mobile apps
such as DermEngine, handyscope, VisualDx and DermExpert are useful tools that
aid primary care physicians to identify a changing mole or ‘ugly duckling
sign’. Tele dermatology and artificial intelligence may further enhance the
capabilities of imaging systems. Miiskin and Molescope are equally useful apps
which enable users to securely upload images online and share their history
electronically with physicians. These apps are intended for use with smartphone
dermoscopic attachments. Watchful surveillance is also key. Treatment options
for early detected melanoma should include skin biopsy, Wide local excision WLE
and long- term follow–up of 5 - 20 years for signs of recurrence and invasive
melanoma.
Author Contributions
Abiola Odeyinka MD has
responsibility for conceptualization, design, writing, revision of the
manuscript.
Acknowledgements
Histology findings from
histopathology department of university hospital north midlands NHS trust.
References
2. Stern
RS. Prevalence of a history of skin cancer in 2007: results of an
incidence-based model. Arch Dermatol 2010;146(3):279-282.
3. National Cancer Institute Surveillance,
Epidemiology and End Results SEER Database.
5. Chen JY, Fernandez K, Fadadu
RP, et al. Skin cancer Diagnosis by lesion, Physician and examination type. A
systematic review and Meta-Analysis JAMA Dermatol 2025;161(2):135-146.
6. Kunishige
JH, Doan L, Brodland DG, et al. Comparison of surgical margins for lentigo malign
versus melanoma in situ. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019;81(1):204-212.
7. Ellison PM,
Zitelli JA, Brodland DG. Mohs
micrographic surgery for melanoma: A prospective multicentre study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019;81(3):767-774.
8. National Cancer Institute.
9. Lo SN,
Williams GJ, Cust AE, et al. Risk of Death Due to Melanoma and Other Causes in
Patients with Thin Cutaneous Melanomas December 11, 2024. JAMA Dermatol
2025;161(2):167-174.
10. Weiss JM, Hunter MV, et al. Nature. Anatomic position
determines oncogenic specificity in melanoma 2022;604(7905):354-361.
11. Wong SL,
Kattan MW, McMasters KM, Coit DG. A nomogram that predicts the presence of
sentinel node metastasis in melanoma with better discrimination than the
American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Ann Surg Oncol
2005;12(4):282-288.
12. Bertolli E,
Calsavara VF, de Macedo MP, Pinto CAL, Duprat Neto JP. Development
and validation of a Brazilian nomogram to assess sentinel node biopsy
positivity in melanoma. Tumori
2021;107(5):440-445.
13. Miller JR III,
Lo SN, Nosrati M, et al. Improving selection for sentinel
lymph node biopsy among patients with melanoma. JAMA Netw Open
2023;6(4):236356.
14. Naffouje SA,
Naffouje R, Chen J, Salti GI. Validation and enhancement of the
clinicopathological melanoma nomogram via incorporation of a molecular marker
in the primary tumor. Anticancer Res 2016;36(12):6603-6610.
15. Pasquali S,
Mocellin S, Campana LG, et al. Maximizing the clinical usefulness of
a nomogram to select patients’ candidate
to sentinel node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma. Eur J Surg Oncol
2011;37(8):675-680.
16. Tripathi R,
Larson K, Fowler G, et al. A clinical decision tool to calculate pretest
probability of sentinel lymph node metastasis in primary cutaneous melanoma. Ann
Surg Oncol 2023;30(7):4321-4328.
17. Ma B, Gandhi M, Czyz S, et al. Risk Prediction Models for Sentinel
Node Positivity in Melanoma. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis JAMA
Dermatol 2025.
18. Cohn-Cedermark
G, Rutqvist LE andersson R, et al. Long term
results of a randomized study by the Swedish Melanoma Study Group on 2-cm
versus 5-cm resection margins for patients with cutaneous melanoma with a tumor
thickness of 0.8-2.0 mm. Cancer 2000;89(7):1495-1501.
19. Balch CM,
Soong SJ, Smith T, et al. Long-term
results of a prospective surgical trial comparing 2 cm vs. 4 cm excision
margins for 740 patients with 1-4 mm melanomas. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8(2):101-108.
20. Hanna EG, Kjellstrom T, Bennett C, Dear K. Climate change and rising heat:
population health implications for working people in Australia Asia Pac J
Public Health 2011;23:14-26.
21. Armstrong BK, Kricker A. How much melanoma is
caused by sun exposure? Melanoma Res 1993;3(6):395-402.
22. Armstrong
BK. How sun exposure causes skin cancer: an epidemiological perspective. In:
Hill D, Elwood JM. English, D.R. (eds) Prevention of Skin Cancer. Cancer
Prevention - Cancer
Causes 2004;3.
23. Coups EJ, Manne SL, Heckman CJ. Multiple skin cancer risk behaviours in the U.S. Population Am J Prev
Med 2008;34:87-93.
24. Parent ME,
El-Zein M, Rousseau MC, Pintos J, Siemiatycki
J. Night work and the risk of cancer among men. Am J Epidemiol 2012;176:751-759.
25. Snyder A,
Valdebran M, Terrero D, Amber KT, Kelly KM. Solar Ultraviolet Exposure in
Individuals Who Perform Outdoor Sport Activities. Sports Med Open 2020;6(1):42.
26. Watson TPG, Tong M, Bailie J, Ekanayake K, Bailie RS. Relationship between climate change
and skin cancer and implications for prevention and management: a scoping
review.
27. Young AT, Vora NB, Cortez J, et al. The role of
technology in melanoma screening and diagnosis 2020;18.
28. Gershenwald
JE, Scolyer RA, Hess KR, et
al. For members
of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Expert Panel and the
International Melanoma Database and Discovery Platform. Melanoma staging:
Evidence-based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition
cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67(6):472-492.
29. Marwaha SS,
Fevrier H, Alexeeff S, et
al. Comparative effectiveness study of face-to-face and tele dermatology
workflows for diagnosing skin cancer. J American Academy Dermatology 2019;81(5):1099-1106.
30. Sander M,
Sander M, Burbidge T, Beecker J. The efficacy and safety of sunscreen use for
the prevention of skin cancer. CMAJ 2020;192(50): 1802-1808.
31. Bailey CN, Martin BJ, Petkov VI. Gene
Expression Profile Testing in Cutaneous Melanoma and Survival Outcomes in a
Population-Based Analysis: A SEER Collaboration. JCO Precision Oncology 7.