6360abefb0d6371309cc9857
Abstract
This retrospective
study explored the association between joint osteophyte severity and joint
stiffness and evaluated stiffness-focused nursing interventions in 30 patients
with joint osteophytes. Patients were divided into intervention group (n=15)
and control group (n=15). The control group received routine nursing care,
while the intervention group received additional stiffness-focused nursing
interventions including structured range-of-motion exercises, thermal therapy
protocols and activity timing guidance. Primary outcomes included the
correlation between osteophyte severity (Larsen grade) and stiffness duration
(morning stiffness and total daily stiffness time) and the change in stiffness
duration at 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included joint mobility (ROM), Lequesne
Index and patient-reported functional impairment (FIQ). Results showed a
significant positive correlation between Larsen grade and initial total daily
stiffness time (r=0.71, p<0.01). At 4 weeks, the intervention group had a
significantly greater reduction in total daily stiffness time compared to the
control group (58.6±12.3 mins vs 27.4±10.5 mins, p<0.01). The intervention
group also showed better improvement in ROM, Lequesne Index and FIQ score
(p<0.05 for all). Stiffness-focused nursing interventions effectively reduce
joint stiffness associated with osteophytes and improve patient function.
Keywords: Larsen grade; Lequesne index; Osteophytes
Introduction
Joint stiffness is a
disabling symptom in patients with joint osteophytes, with 60-70% of affected
individuals reporting significant morning stiffness and activity-related
stiffness1. The relationship between osteophyte severity and
stiffness is mediated by joint space narrowing and synovial changes, requiring
targeted nursing strategies to address mobility limitations2. This study investigates the correlation between
osteophytes and stiffness and evaluates stiffness-specific interventions,
addressing the lack of focused nursing protocols for this symptom3.
Methods
Study design and
participants
Retrospective analysis of 30 patients with
radiographically confirmed joint osteophytes (knee: 21 cases, hip: 9 cases).
Inclusion criteria: age 50-75 years; Larsen grade I-IV osteophytes; presence of
joint stiffness (>30 mins morning stiffness or >2 hrs daily stiffness).
Exclusion criteria: inflammatory arthritis, joint contractures and neurological
disorders affecting mobility.
Grouping & interventions
Control group: Routine nursing care
(general mobility advice, pain assessment, medication reminders).
Intervention group: Added stiffness-focused
interventions
• Structured ROM exercises: Gentle stretching sequences (3 sets/day) targeting affected joints, with progressive intensity based on tolerance.
• Thermal therapy protocol: Warm compresses (40-42°C) for 15 mins pre-exercise, followed by cold compresses post-activity.
• Activity timing guidance: Scheduling daily activities during periods of minimal stiffness, with rest breaks to prevent stiffness exacerbation.
• Self-management training: Teaching patients to recognize early stiffness signs and perform preventive exercises.
Outcome measures
• Primary: Correlation between Larsen grade and initial stiffness duration (morning stiffness in mins; total daily stiffness time in mins); change in total daily stiffness time at 4 weeks.
• Secondary: Joint ROM (degrees), Lequesne Index, Functional Impairment Questionnaire (FIQ) score (0-100, higher=worse).
Statistical analysis
SPSS 26.0 used for
Pearson correlation, independent t-tests and paired t-tests. p<0.05 was
significant.
Results
Association between osteophytes and stiffness
Significant positive
correlations were found between Larsen grade and morning stiffness duration
(r=0.65, p<0.01) and total daily stiffness time (r=0.71, p<0.01).
Baseline characteristics
No significant
differences in baseline characteristics between groups (Table 1).
Table 1: Baseline
Characteristics
|
Characteristics |
Intervention Group (n=15) |
Control Group (n=15) |
p-value |
|
Age (years, x̄±s) |
62.3±7.5 |
63.1±8.2 |
0.782 |
|
Gender (male/female, n) |
9/6 |
8/7 |
0.763 |
|
Affected joint (knee/hip, n) |
11/4 |
10/5 |
0.731 |
|
Larsen grade
(I/II/III/IV, n) |
2/7/4/2 |
3/6/4/2 |
0.925 |
|
Morning stiffness (mins, x̄±s) |
42.5±11.3 |
44.2±10.8 |
0.689 |
|
Total daily stiffness time (mins, x̄±s) |
85.6±18.4 |
88.3±17.6 |
0.712 |
|
ROM (degrees, x̄±s) |
68.3±12.5 |
66.7±13.1 |
0.735 |
Discussion
This study confirmed
a strong positive correlation between joint osteophyte severity and stiffness
duration, consistent with mechanisms involving osteophyte-induced joint space
narrowing and synovial thickening4. The
stiffness-focused interventions addressed key pathophysiological factors:
structured ROM exercises prevented adhesions and maintained joint mobility5, while pre-exercise
thermal therapy increased tissue extensibility through collagen relaxation6.
The significant
reduction in stiffness in the intervention group (58.6 mins vs 27.4 mins)
aligns with evidence that consistent stretching programs reduce
osteophyte-related stiffness by 40-50%7. Activity timing
guidance minimized stiffness exacerbation during peak functional periods,
enhancing patient confidence and adherence8.
Notably, improved
ROM in the intervention group translated to better functional outcomes, as
measured by Lequesne Index and FIQ. This highlights the importance of stiffness
reduction as a pathway to improved function, beyond pain management alone9.
Limitations include
small sample size, single-center design and lack of long-term follow-up. Future
studies should explore the sustainability of these interventions and their
effect on slowing stiffness progression.
Conclusion
Joint osteophyte severity
correlates significantly with joint stiffness duration. Stiffness-focused
nursing interventions effectively reduce stiffness, improve joint mobility and
enhance functional status. These strategies should be integrated into nursing
care for osteophyte patients to address this disabling symptom.
References
2. Felson DT, Naimark A anderson J, et al. The relationship of
radiological changes to pain in osteoarthritis of the knee. J Rheumatol
1988;15(6):910-913.
3. Zhang W, Doherty M, Leeb
BF, et al. EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of hand
osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for
International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66(3):377-388.
4. Goldring MB, Goldring SR.
Osteoarthritis. J Cell Physiol 2007;213(3):626-634.
5. Bennell KL, Hunt MA,
Wrigley TV, et al. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized
controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62(1):20-29.
6. Halperin NM, Denegar CR. Therapeutic modalities for
musculoskeletal injuries. In: Prentice WE, ed. Therapeutic Modalities in
Rehabilitation. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill 2018:113-142.
7. Roddy E, Zhang W, Doherty
M. Aerobic walking or strengthening exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee? A
systematic review. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64(4):544-548.
8. Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Sobel DS, et al. Effect
of a self-management program for patients with chronic disease. Eff Clin Pract
2001;4(6):256-262.
9. March LM, Creemers JM, Peat G, et al. The relationship between
physical function and pain in knee osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis
initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013;21(1):107-114.