6360abefb0d6371309cc9857

Full Text

Research Article

Correlation Between Osteoarthrosis and Natural Aging-Tailored


Abstract
This retrospective study explored the correlation between osteoarthrosis severity and natural aging and evaluated age-tailored nursing interventions in 40 patients with osteoarthrosis. Patients were stratified into middle-aged group (45-64 years, n=20) and elderly group (≥65 years, n=20), with each group divided into intervention (n=11) and control (n=9) subgroups. Intervention subgroups received age-tailored nursing (adjusted exercise intensity, multimorbidity management, geriatric syndrome prevention), while controls received routine care. Primary outcomes included correlation between age and osteoarthrosis severity (Kellgren-Lawrence grade) and change in Lequesne Index at 6 months. Results showed significant positive correlation between age and initial Kellgren-Lawrence grade (r=0.69, p<0.01). Intervention subgroups in both age strata demonstrated greater improvement in Lequesne Index (middle-aged: 11.8±3.1 vs 6.2±2.5; elderly: 10.5±2.8 vs 4.9±2.2, p<0.01 for both). Age-tailored nursing interventions effectively improve outcomes in age-related osteoarthrosis, with tailored strategies addressing age-specific physiological changes.

Keywords:
Osteoarthrosis; Larsen grade; Kellgren-lawrence grade; Lequesne index

Introduction

Natural aging is the strongest non-modifiable risk factor for osteoarthrosis, with prevalence increasing from 12% in adults <50 years to 68% in those ≥70 years1. Age-related changes (chondrocyte senescence, extracellular matrix degradation and reduced periarticular muscle mass) accelerate osteoarthrosis progression2. This study investigates the age-osteoarthrosis correlation and evaluates nursing interventions tailored to different age groups, addressing the lack of age-stratified nursing protocols3.

Methods
Study design and participants
Retrospective analysis of 40 patients with radiographically confirmed osteoarthrosis (knee: 28 cases, hip: 12 cases). Inclusion criteria: age 45-85 years; Kellgren-Lawrence grade I-IV; no history of joint trauma or inflammatory arthritis. Exclusion criteria: metabolic bone diseases, joint surgery history and cognitive impairment precluding intervention compliance.

Grouping & interventions
Control subgroups: Routine care (pain assessment, general mobility advice).

Intervention subgroups: Age-tailored interventions:
• Middle-aged group: Moderate-intensity resistance training (3x/week), workplace ergonomics guidance and metabolic risk factor control (weight/BMI monitoring).
• Elderly group: Low-impact aquatic exercise, fall prevention programs, polypharmacy review (to avoid drug-induced myopathy) and sarcopenia screening with protein supplementation.
• Both groups: Joint protection education, progressive activity pacing and symptom self-management training.

Outcome measures
• Primary: Correlation between age and initial Kellgren-Lawrence grade; change in Lequesne Index (0-24, higher=worse) at 6 months.
• Secondary: Muscle strength (handheld dynamometry), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) in elderly subgroup.

Statistical analysis
SPSS 26.0 used for Pearson correlation, independent t-tests and two-way ANOVA. p<0.05 was significant.

Results
Age-osteoarthrosis correlation and baseline data
Significant positive correlation between age and initial Kellgren-Lawrence grade (r=0.69, p<0.01). No significant differences in baseline characteristics within age strata (Table 1).

Table 1:
Baseline Characteristics by Age Group

Characteristics

Middle-aged (45-64y, n=20)

Elderly (≥65y, n=20)

p-value

Mean age (years)

57.2±7.5

73.1±6.9

<0.001

Male gender, n(%)

11(55.0)

10(50.0)

0.76

Affected joint (knee/hip)

15/5

13/7

0.62

Initial Kellgren-Lawrence grade

1.9±0.7

3.0±0.8

<0.001

Initial Lequesne Index

17.8±4.0

21.9±3.7

0.009

Muscle strength (kg)

27.8±5.1

20.5±4.3

<0.001


Primary outcome
Greater improvement in Lequesne Index in intervention subgroups across both age groups (Table 2).

Table 2:
Change in Lequesne Index at 6 Months

Group

n

Baseline

6 Months

Change (mean±SD)

p-value

Middle-aged Intervention

11

17.5±3.8

5.7±2.3

11.8±3.1

<0.001

Middle-aged Control

9

18.1±4.2

11.9±3.0

6.2±2.5

-

Elderly Intervention

11

21.6±3.6

11.1±2.9

10.5±2.8

<0.001

Elderly Control

9

22.2±3.9

17.3±3.4

4.9±2.2

-


Secondary outcomes
Intervention subgroups showed significant improvements in muscle strength and TUG test, with elderly intervention subgroup demonstrating higher GNRI (Table 3).

Table 3:
Secondary Outcomes at 6 Months

Outcome

Middle-aged Group

Elderly Group

p-value (intervention effect)

Muscle strength (kg)

Intervention:32.9±4.6

Intervention:24.2±4.0

<0.001

 

Control:28.3±5.0

Control:21.0±3.7

-

TUG test (sec)

Intervention:8.1±1.4

Intervention:11.1±2.0

<0.001

 

Control:10.3±1.9

Control:15.5±2.6

-

GNRI (elderly only)

-

Intervention:98.3±5.1

0.003

 

-

Control:89.8±6.5

-


Discussion
This study confirms a strong positive correlation between natural aging and osteoarthrosis severity, consistent with age-related chondrocyte senescence and matrix degradation mechanisms4. The 57.9% higher Kellgren-Lawrence grade in the elderly group aligns with epidemiological data showing exponential osteoarthrosis progression after 65 years5.

Age-tailored interventions addressed key age-specific factors: middle-aged patients benefited from resistance training to counter early muscle loss, while elderly patients required low-impact exercise to balance mobility and fall risk6. Polypharmacy review in the elderly subgroup reduced use of medications (e.g., long-term glucocorticoids) that exacerbate muscle weakness and joint degeneration7.

Notably, the elderly intervention subgroup showed significant GNRI improvement, highlighting the role of nutrition in maintaining musculoskeletal health during aging-a factor often overlooked in standard osteoarthrosis care8. The smaller absolute improvement in the elderly group reflects irreversible age-related changes, emphasizing the importance of early intervention.

 

Limitations include small sample size and lack of histopathological confirmation of age-related chondrocyte changes. Future studies should incorporate biomarkers of cellular senescence to better quantify the aging-osteoarthrosis relationship.

 

Conclusion

Osteoarthrosis severity correlates significantly with natural aging. Age-tailored nursing interventions effectively improve functional outcomes by addressing age-specific physiological changes (muscle loss, multimorbidity, nutritional decline). These strategies should be integrated into nursing care to optimize outcomes across the age spectrum.

 

References

1. Felson DT, Naimark A anderson J, et al. The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly. The Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum 1987;30(8):914-918.
2. Loeser RF. Aging and osteoarthritis: mechanisms, biomarkers and potential therapies. Aging Cell 2010;9(4):434-448.
3. Vincent HK, Hébert R, Morin D, et al. Musculoskeletal health in older adults: an overview of the problem and strategies for intervention. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012;60(4):773-778.
4. Goldring MB, Otero M. Aging and osteoarthritis: the role of chondrocyte senescence and aging-related pathways. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2011;13(6):455-464.
5. Zhang Y, Jordan JM. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Clin Geriatr Med 2010;26(3):355-369.
6. Bean JF orwoll ES, Cauley JA, et al. Effects of resistance training on older adults: a meta-analysis. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002;57(2):M134-M143.
7. Vandewoude MF, Bruyère O, Reginster JY. Drug-induced osteoporosis and osteopenia: mechanisms and management. Drugs Aging 2012;29(1):1-16.
8. Cesari M, Pahor M, Bartali B, et al. Serum albumin levels and 6-year mortality in older persons: results from the InCHIANTI study. J Gerontol a Biol Sci Med Sci 2004;59(7):695-701.