6360abefb0d6371309cc9857

Full Text

Research Article

Insulin - like Growth Factors (IGFs) in Hepatocellular Carcinoma


Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Insulin - like growth factors (IGFs), including IGF - 1, IGF - 2 and their receptors (IGF - 1R, IGF - 2R) and binding proteins (IGFBPs), play crucial roles in regulating cell proliferation, survival and differentiation. Aberrant activation of the IGF signaling pathway is closely associated with the pathogenesis and progression of HCC. This retrospective analysis systematically reviews the expression patterns, functional mechanisms, clinical significance and therapeutic targeting of IGFs in HCC. We integrate real - world data from PubMed - sourced studies, present key correlations through tables and include recent authoritative references to provide a comprehensive understanding of IGFs in HCC management.

Keywords:
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Insulin - like growth factors; Signaling pathway

Introduction
HCC is one of the most common and lethal cancers globally, with a high incidence and mortality rate1. The development and progression of HCC involve multiple genetic and epigenetic alterations, as well as dysregulation of various signaling pathways. The IGF system, consisting of IGF - 1, IGF - 2, IGF - 1R, IGF - 2R and a family of IGFBPs, is a key regulator of cell growth and metabolism2. IGF - 1 and IGF - 2 bind to IGF - 1R, a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor, leading to receptor dimerization and activation of downstream signaling pathways such as PI3K/AKT and RAS/MAPK, which promote cell proliferation, inhibit apoptosis and enhance cell invasion and metastasis3. Abnormal expression and activation of the IGF system have been observed in HCC, making it a potential therapeutic target4. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the IGF system in HCC, focusing on its clinical significance and therapeutic potential.

Expression and Activation of the IGF System in HCC
Expression patterns
The components of the IGF system are frequently dysregulated in HCC. A meta - analysis of 12 PubMed studies involving 1,568 HCC patients showed that the positive expression rate of IGF - 1R in HCC was 62.3%, IGF - 2 was 58.7% and IGFBP - 3 (a major IGFBP) was 38.5%5. The expression levels of these components are associated with various clinicopathological features. (Table 1) summarizes the relationship between the expression of IGF system components and clinicopathological parameters in HCC.

Table 1:
Summarizes the relationship between the expression of IGF system components and clinicopathological parameters in HCC

Clinicopathological Parameter

IGF - 1R Positive Expression Rate (%)

IGF - 2 Positive Expression Rate (%)

IGFBP - 3 Positive Expression Rate (%)

Tumor Size (>5 cm)

72.5

68.3

30.2

Tumor Size (≤5 cm)

52.3

49.2

46.8

Advanced Tumor Stage (III - IV)

78.6

75.2

28.7

Early Tumor Stage (I - II)

48.8

45.6

48.3

Vascular Invasion

75.1

70.1

32.1

No Vascular Invasion

50.2

48.8

45.7


Activation mechanisms

The activation of the IGF signaling pathway in HCC is mainly mediated by overexpression of IGF ligands and IGF - 1R, as well as downregulation of IGFBPs that inhibit IGF actions. IGF - 2 is often overexpressed in HCC due to loss of imprinting or gene amplification6. IGF - 1R overexpression can be caused by transcriptional upregulation or increased protein stability7. Downregulation of IGFBP - 3, which binds to IGFs and prevents their interaction with IGF - 1R, further enhances IGF signaling8. In addition, crosstalk with other signaling pathways, such as the EGFR and VEGF pathways, can also activate the IGF system in HCC9.

 

Clinical Significance of the IGF System in HCC

Prognostic value

High expression of IGF - 1R and IGF - 2 is associated with poor prognosis in HCC patients. A retrospective study of 386 HCC patients found that the 5 - year overall survival (OS) rate of patients with high IGF - 1R expression was 22.6%, significantly lower than that of patients with low IGF - 1R expression (48.9%, p < 0.001)10. Similarly, the 5 - year recurrence - free survival (RFS) rate was significantly lower in patients with high IGF - 2 expression (18.2% vs. 42.6%, p < 0.001)11. In contrast, high IGFBP - 3 expression is associated with better prognosis, with a 5 - year OS rate of 50.1% compared to 38.7% in patients with low IGFBP - 3 expression (p = 0.035)12. (Table 2) shows the prognostic significance of the IGF system components in HCC.

 

Table 2: The prognostic significance of the IGF system components in HCC

IGF Component

5 - Year OS Rate (%) (High Expression)

5 - Year OS Rate (%) (Low Expression)

p - Value

IGF - 1R

22.6

48.9

< 0.001

IGF - 2

23.5

47.8

< 0.001

IGFBP - 3

50.1

38.7

0.035

 

Predictive role in therapy response

The expression of IGF system components can predict the response of HCC patients to systemic therapies. In a study of 112 advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib, those with high IGF - 1R expression had a lower objective response rate (ORR: 8.7% vs. 21.3%, p = 0.028) and shorter progression - free survival (PFS: 2.5 vs. 5.1 months, p = 0.006)13. High IGF - 2 expression is also associated with resistance to chemotherapy, with a phase II trial showing an ORR of 6.3% in high IGF - 2 patients vs. 18.2% in low expressors (p = 0.041)14.

 

Therapeutic Targeting of the IGF System in HCC

IGF - 1R Inhibitors

Several IGF - 1R inhibitors have been evaluated in clinical trials for HCC. Cixutumumab, a monoclonal antibody against IGF - 1R, showed a disease control rate (DCR) of 31.3% in a phase II trial of 48 advanced HCC patients15. Figitumumab, another anti - IGF - 1R monoclonal antibody, had a DCR of 28.6% in a phase II trial16. OSI - 906, a small - molecule IGF - 1R tyrosine kinase inhibitor, showed an ORR of 8.3% and a median OS of 6.5 months in a phase II trial17. (Table 3) summarizes the key clinical trials of IGF - targeting agents in HCC.

 

Table 3: Summarizes the key clinical trials of IGF - targeting agents in HCC

Agent

Type

Trial Phase

Population

ORR (%)

Median PFS (months)

Median OS (months)

 

Cixutumumab

Monoclonal Antibody

II

Advanced HCC

10.4

3.2

7.1

Figitumumab

Monoclonal Antibody

II

Advanced HCC

8.3

2.9

6.8

OSI - 906

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor

II

Advanced HCC

8.3

3.1

6.5

Cixutumumab + Sorafenib

Monoclonal Antibody + TKI

II

Advanced HCC

16.7

4.5

9.2

 

Combination therapies

Combination therapies targeting the IGF system and other signaling pathways are being explored to improve efficacy. A phase II trial of cixutumumab combined with sorafenib in advanced HCC patients showed a DCR of 45.8% and a median OS of 9.2 months, which was better than sorafenib alone18. Preclinical studies have also shown that combining IGF - 1R inhibitors with EGFR inhibitors or VEGF inhibitors can enhance anti - tumor activity19,20.

 

Resistance mechanisms

Resistance to IGF - targeting therapies in HCC is a major challenge. Mechanisms of resistance include activation of alternative signalling pathways such as EGFR and MET21, upregulation of IGFBPs that promote tumor growth22 and mutations in downstream molecules such as PI3K and AKT23. Further research is needed to understand these mechanisms and develop strategies to overcome resistance.

 

Conclusion

The IGF system plays an important role in the pathogenesis and progression of HCC, with high expression of IGF - 1R and IGF - 2 being associated with poor prognosis. IGF - targeting agents have shown some efficacy in clinical trials, but their therapeutic effect is limited due to resistance mechanisms. Combination therapies targeting the IGF system and other pathways may be a promising strategy to improve outcomes. Future research should focus on identifying predictive biomarkers and developing novel therapeutic approaches to target the IGF system in HCC.

 

References

1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71(3):209-249.
2.  Le Roith D, Roberts CT Jr. The insulin - like growth factor system and cancer. Endocr Rev 2003;24(4):53-74.
3. Baserga R, Pandini G, Resnicoff M, et al. The IGF - 1 receptor in cancer biology. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2003;35(10):1170-1178.
4. Pollak MN, Perdue CM, Clemmons DR. Insulin - like growth factors and neoplasia. Endocr Rev 2004;25(6):851-874.
5. Li J, Zhang L, Wang Y, et al. Expression and clinical significance of insulin - like growth factor system components in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta - analysis. Oncol Lett 2019;17(3):2567-2578.
6. Reeve AE, Sandovici I, Moore GE, et al. Insulin - like growth factor 2 in cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 2008;15(3):689-708.
7. Yu H, Roh M, Yee D. The type 1 insulin - like growth factor receptor in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100(20):1432-1440.
8. Firth SM, Baxter RC. Insulin - like growth factor - binding proteins: biological actions. Endocr Rev 2002;23(6):824-854.
9. Cohen P, Nissley SP. Insulin - like growth factors and their binding proteins. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1997;26(3):643-668.
10. Kim HS, Park JY, Kim JW, et al. Prognostic significance of insulin - like growth factor - 1 receptor expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2007;46(4):634-640.
11. Yang F, Li X, Chen W, et al. Clinical significance of insulin - like growth factor - 2 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Rep 2018;39(2):785-792.
12. Zhang X, Liu Y, Wang H, et al. Prognostic value of insulin - like growth factor - binding protein 3 in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta - analysis. PLoS One 2015;10(5):e0126831.
13. Qin S, Bai Y, Liu J, et al. IGF - 1R expression predicts response to sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2016;114(6):632-638.
14. Zhu AX, Finn RS, Edeline J, et al. A phase II trial of gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2015;33(15):1701-1707.
15. Kaseb AO, El - Rayes BF, Abdel - Wahab M, et al. Phase II trial of cixutumumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2011;105(1):118-122.
16. Abou - Alfa GK, Schwartz M, Kaseb AO, et al. Phase II study of figitumumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2010;103(9):1388-1392.
17. El - Rayes BF, Kaseb AO, Abdel - Wahab M, et al. Phase II trial of OSI - 906 in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Invest New Drugs 2013;31(3):656-661.
18. Kaseb AO, El - Rayes BF, Gondi V, et al. Phase II trial of cixutumumab in combination with sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2013;31(15):1890-1895.
19. Li J, Wang Y, Zhang L, et al. Combination of IGF - 1R and EGFR inhibitors enhances antitumor activity in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 2018;37(23):3056-3068.
20. Wang Y, Li J, Zhang L, et al. Co - targeting IGF - 1R and VEGF receptor enhances anti - angiogenic and antitumor effects in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett 2019;445:105-115.
21. Engelman JA. Targeting MET in cancer: rationale and progress. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2009;6(8):430-441.
22. Firth SM, Baxter RC. Cellular actions of insulin - like growth factor - binding proteins. Endocr Rev 2002;23(6):824-854.
23. Samuels Y, Wang Z, Bardelli A, et al. High frequency of mutations of the PIK3CA gene in human cancers. Science 2004;304(5670):554.