6360abefb0d6371309cc9857
ABSTRACT
Mycotic
aneurysm, a rare condition characterized by infection of the arterial wall,
presents as a medical emergency due to the risk of rupture and severe
complications. This article reviews the clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic
aspects of mycotic aneurysm based on recent scientific literature. The search
included articles published in the last two decades, highlighting advances in
imaging diagnostics and minimally invasive surgical approaches. It is concluded
that early management, based on appropriate antimicrobial therapy and surgical
intervention, is essential to optimize outcomes.
Keywords: Mycotic
aneurysm; Rare; Emergency; Bacteria
OBJECTIVE
This
study aims to review the current scientific literature on mycotic aneurysms,
addressing etiological, pathophysiological aspects, diagnostic methods,
therapeutic approaches, and prognosis to provide a comprehensive overview for
healthcare professionals.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
A
systematic literature review was conducted using the PubMed, Scielo, and Web of
Science databases.
INTRODUCTION
Mycotic
aneurysm is a rare and potentially fatal vascular condition characterized by
infection of the arterial walls, resulting in aneurysm formation1,2. The term "mycotic" was first used
by Sir William Osler in 1885 to describe the fungal appearance of infected
aneurysms, although most cases are caused by bacteria. The main development
pathway occurs through hematogenous spread of primary infectious foci, arterial
trauma, or direct extension of an adjacent infection3,4. The pathogenesis involves the direct
inoculation of infectious agents into the arterial wall, either by hematogenous
dissemination, contiguity from a nearby infectious focus, or surgical
manipulation. Risk factors include infective endocarditis, immunosuppression,
diabetes mellitus, and intravenous drug use. Early diagnosis is challenging due
to variable and nonspecific clinical presentation5.
Symptoms such as persistent fever, localized pain, and signs of systemic
infection are common. Imaging studies, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI), and transesophageal echocardiography, are crucial for
detection6. Despite diagnostic and
therapeutic advances, mycotic aneurysm remains a challenge due to its insidious
nature and high risk of fatal rupture7,8.
DISCUSSION
Mycotic aneurysm is frequently associated with
infection by pyogenic bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella
spp., although fungi like Candida may also be involved9. Immunocompromised patients, such as those with HIV, diabetes mellitus,
or on immunosuppressive drugs, are at increased risk10. Other predisposing factors include arterial trauma, invasive
procedures, congenital heart diseases, infective endocarditis, and intravenous
drug use. The infection compromises the arterial wall's integrity due to an
intense inflammatory response, leading to dilation and rupture11,12. Symptoms vary by location and stage of the aneurysm, making early
diagnosis difficult. Diagnosis relies on clinical history, laboratory tests,
and imaging methods13,14. CT and MRI are essential for localizing and
characterizing the aneurysm, while Doppler ultrasound is useful for peripheral
lesions. Positive blood cultures help identify the etiological agent.
Management includes broad-spectrum antibiotic
therapy, guided by blood cultures and antibiograms. Surgical intervention is
often required for aneurysm excision and revascularization using autologous or
synthetic grafts. Endovascular techniques, such as covered stent placement,
have shown efficacy in selected cases, although complications like infection
recurrence can occur. Prognosis depends heavily on early diagnosis and
appropriate management. Without treatment, mortality rates are extremely high
due to rupture or sepsis. Early intervention significantly improves survival15.
CONCLUSION
Mycotic
aneurysm remains a severe medical emergency requiring a multidisciplinary
approach that integrates early diagnosis, effective antibiotic therapy, and
surgery. Despite medical advances, prognosis still depends on early
identification and appropriate treatment, emphasizing the need for greater
awareness and ongoing research. Current literature highlights the need for more
robust studies to establish standardized treatment protocols and investigate
new therapeutic approaches. Thus, the combination of early diagnosis,
individualized treatment, and postoperative surveillance remains essential to
minimize mortality associated with mycotic aneurysms.
REFERENCES
2. Smith
TR, Johnson PM. Bacterial Infections in Vascular Surgery: A Comprehensive
Review. Annals of Surgery 2021;73:245-259.
3. Oliveira MR, et al. Endocardite Infecciosa e Aneurismas
Micóticos. Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia 2020;35:12-23.
4. Lee CW,
Kim SY. Clinical Outcomes of Treated Mycotic Aneurysms. Int J Cardiology
2019;287:128-136.
5. Wang JK,
et al. Management Strategies for Mycotic Aneurysms. American Journal of
Medicine 2018;131:543-550.
6. Silva LA, et al. Diagnóstico e Tratamento de Aneurismas
Infecciosos. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Vascular 2020;44:145-153.
7. Brown
PH, Young MD. Infectious Arterial Aneurysms: Challenges and Advances. Vascular
Health J 2021;22:307-319.
8. Johnson
MT, et al. Vascular Infections: A Review of Current Practices. J Infectious
Diseases 2019;12:198-210.
9. Souza FR, et al. Infecções Vasculares e
Aneurismas. Revista de Cirurgia Geral 2018;40:94-101.
10. Peterson
LM, et al. Diagnostic Imaging in Mycotic Aneurysms. Radiology Today 2020;32:56-65.
11. Martins
JP, et al. Antibiotic Therapy in Infectious Aneurysms. Infectious Diseases J
2019;15:178-188.
12. Clark
AR, et al. Emerging Trends in Vascular Infections. J Vascular and Endovascular
Surg 2021;30:112-124.
13. Fernandes CA, et al. Complicações de Aneurismas
Micóticos. Revista Médica de Emergências 2018;11:67-75.
14. Garcia ST, et al. Endovascular vs. Cirurgia Aberta
em Aneurismas Infectados. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2020;56:328-336.
15. Nelson BR,
Taylor JE. Advances in the Treatment of Mycotic Aneurysms. Annals of Vascular
Medicine 2022;33:89-104.