6360abefb0d6371309cc9857
Abstract
Regenerative therapy
with stem cells in fat grafting has emerged as a promising strategy to improve
graft survival and tissue quality. The application of adipose-derived stem
cells (ADSCs) enhances angiogenesis, reduces fat resorption and promotes tissue
remodeling, overcoming limitations of conventional lipotransfer techniques.
Preclinical studies show that ADSCs secrete angiogenic factors such as VEGF and
HGF, improving local neovascularization and graft integration. Initial clinical
trials demonstrate greater volume retention and reduced fibrosis in
cell-assisted grafts compared to pure fat grafts. However, variation in
protocols for ADSC isolation, cultivation and concentration hinders result
standardization and direct comparison between studies. Another concern involves
safety: although most studies report no significant adverse events, long-term
follow-up is needed to evaluate theoretical risks, such as potential
tumorigenesis. This review analyzes the mechanisms of action of ADSCs in fat
grafting, outlines key cell preparation methods and describes relevant clinical
outcomes. Regulatory challenges, ethical issues and future perspectives are
also discussed, including bioengineering techniques and three-dimensional
scaffolds to optimize regenerative therapy. Finally, the urgency of randomized,
multicenter and long-term studies is emphasized to consolidate evidence of
efficacy and safety, aiming at the clinical incorporation of this approach in
soft tissue reconstruction and harmonization.
Keywords: Fat grafting; Adipose-derived stem cells;
Cell-assisted lipotransfer; Angiogenesis; Tissue regeneration
Introduction
Autologous fat grafting
is widely employed in reconstructive and aesthetic plastic surgery to correct
volume defects and body contour irregularities. However, the resorption rate
varies from 20% to 70%, often requiring repeated procedures to maintain satisfactory
outcomes. To overcome these limitations, researchers have incorporated
adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) into fat grafts, creating what
is termed “cell-assisted lipotransfer” (CAL). ADSCs display high proliferation
capacity and secrete paracrine angiogenic and anti-apoptotic factors,
contributing to improved graft viability and recipient site integration. The
pioneering method proposed by Yoshimura, et al. involves isolating nano fat1, centrifuging lipoaspirate samples and retrieving the
“stem cell pellet,” which is then reinjected with adipose tissue during the
same surgical procedure. This technique demonstrated significantly increased
volume retention in initial clinical studies on breast augmentation and facial
filling. Rigorous preclinical animal studies validated that ADSCs promote
capillary formation via VEGF, FGF-2 and HGF release and modulate local
inflammatory responses. Despite improvements in graft survival, preparation
protocols vary widely. Some groups use enzymatic digestion with collagenase to
obtain the stromal vascular fraction (SVF), while others prefer less invasive
mechanical methods to reduce cost and complexity. Variability in the number of
injected cells per volume of fat hampers data comparison and the creation of
standardized clinical guidelines. Regulatory issues also limit CAL's clinical
diffusion. In regions like the United States and European Union, procedures
involving substantial cell manipulation are subject to stringent regulatory
scrutiny, delaying routine adoption. Ethically, patients must be fully informed
of the risks and benefits of experimental cell therapies, including the need
for long-term follow-up to monitor potential adverse outcomes, such as neoplasm
formation.
Objectives
This review aims to synthesize the
current knowledge on regenerative therapy with ADSCs in fat grafting, detailing
mechanisms of action, cell preparation methodologies, preclinical and clinical
evidence, as well as future challenges and perspectives.
Materials and Methods
A literature review
was conducted using the databases PubMed, SciELO, Google Scholar and
ScienceDirect.
Discussion
Results
from animal models of ADSC-enriched lipotransfer highlight the significant
impact of these progenitors on tissue engraftment. In rats, Zhou, et al.
observed 1.5 times greater volume retention in ADSC-assisted grafts compared to
pure grafts2, attributed to
microvascular formation and reduced cell apoptosis. Similarly, Rigotti, et al.
demonstrated improved healing in irradiated tissues, with enriched lipoaspirate
transplants reducing fibrosis and improving dermal elasticity3. Molecular mechanisms involve both direct
transdifferentiation of ADSCs into endothelial cells and paracrine effects via
growth factor release that recruits resident progenitor cells and modulates
inflammation. In clinical settings, Yoshimura, et al. reported higher patient
satisfaction in CAL-assisted breast augmentation1, with
over 80% volume retention after six months compared to 50% in controls. Parikh
& Kim, in a systematic review4, found
that adding ADSCs reduced the amount of fat required by an average of 30% to
achieve comparable outcomes, while also decreasing fat necrosis-related
complications. However, study heterogeneity limits definitive conclusions.
Ferraro, et al. noted that differences in cell viability post-cryopreservation
significantly impact graft effectiveness and no consensus exists on optimal
storage techniques5. Furthermore,
Benjamin, et al. compared PRP and ADSCs for enrichment6, finding similar results, suggesting multiple
paracrine elements may serve as lipotransfer adjuvants.
Regarding
safety, Györgyi, et al. reviewed MCAS reports on cell therapy adverse events
and found no increase in neoplasms or serious complications over five years of
follow-up7, though they
recommend larger long-term studies. The absence of adverse event reports does
not eliminate the need for surveillance, particularly in oncologic or
immunocompromised patients. Advances in bioengineering, such as 3D scaffolds
and ADSC bioreactors, may improve cell production standardization and graft
viability. Planat-Bénard, et al. demonstrated the differentiation of ADSCs into
endothelial cells within biomimetic scaffolds8, paving
the way for prevascularized grafts. Kato, et al. introduced bioreactors capable
of producing functional adipose tissue in vitro9,
potentially reducing clinical variability and enhancing safety10-15.
Conclusion
Regenerative therapy with ADSCs
in fat grafting represents a significant advancement in reconstructive and
aesthetic surgery, offering greater volume retention, improved vascularization
and controlled tissue remodeling. Multiple mechanisms contribute to these
benefits, including paracrine effects and direct cell differentiation,
facilitating angiogenesis, apoptosis inhibition and fibrosis modulation.
Although current clinical studies support enhanced graft survival and patient
satisfaction, methodological heterogeneity - from cell isolation to enrichment
protocols - impedes direct comparisons and the creation of standardized
guidelines. Regulatory and ethical challenges also hinder the routine
application of this technique, necessitating controlled, randomized,
multicenter trials to evaluate efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness in the
medium to long term. Future perspectives include developing prevascularized
scaffolds, standardized ADSC expansion bioreactors and combined approaches
using purified growth factors or controlled-release systems. Efficient
cryopreservation strategies may also enable “off-the-shelf” therapies,
expanding patient access to cell-assisted lipotransfer. In conclusion, while
results are promising, the full clinical adoption of stem cell regenerative
therapy depends on robust evidence and regulatory progress. The maturation of
this technology may transform the field of soft tissue surgery, offering safer,
more effective and longer-lasting treatments worldwide.
References