6360abefb0d6371309cc9857

Full Text

Case Report

Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma with Rhabdoid Features Presenting as Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis


Abstract 
Renal cell carcinoma (rcc) encompasses a diverse range of kidney malignancies, with clear cell rcc being the most common subtype. This article discusses a rare case of a 61-year-old male initially suspected of having xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis, ultimately diagnosed with sarcomatoid rcc featuring focal rhabdoid differentiation. The aggressive nature of this case highlights the importance of thorough diagnostic procedures. Rcc, representing 90% of kidney cancers, has various histological subtypes with distinct grading systems. Sarcomatoid and rhabdoid rcc, though rare, can occur in any subtype and are associated with poorer prognosis. Genetic alterations contribute to their aggressiveness. Current guidelines recommend imaging and biopsy for rcc diagnosis, with surgical management and surveillance for high-risk features. Emerging treatments like pembrolizumab and combination therapies signify a shifting paradigm in rcc management, necessitating tailored approaches based on histology and risk factors.

Keywords: carcinoma; renal cell; clear cell; neoplasm; sarcomatoid; histology; immunohistochemistry

Introduction
Renal cell carcinoma (rcc) comprises a diverse range of cancers originating from renal tubular epithelial cells1, with more than 10 distinct histological subtypes identified1,2. Clear cell rcc (ccrcc) is the predominant subtype, followed by papillary and chromophobe, respectively3. Sarcomatoid dedifferentiation, can occur in up to 15% of rcc patients4, it is characterized by a transformative growth pattern of the epithelial neoplasm into malignant spindle-shaped cells, exhibiting aggressive behavior5,  this tumor manifests as sheets of malignant spindle cells with immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features resembling both stromal and epithelial cells5, initially considered a distinct histological subtype, sarcomatoid transformation is now recognized in current classification systems as a characteristic with the potential to arise in any subtype of rcc6,7.  Rhabdoid differentiation is also observed in rcc, most frequently in clear cell rcc8. Pure rhabdoid rcc is an uncommon and highly aggressive malignancy of the pediatric population. In adults, pure rhabdoid rcc is extremely rare, while rcc with rhabdoid features are more commonly found alongside clear-cell carcinoma. Very few studies report rhabdoid features alongside sarcomatoid rcc. We present one such patient in whom renal mass was found to have sarcomatoid rcc with focal rhabdoid features which mimicked xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis.

 

Case presentation

A 61-year-old male with a history of atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Admitted to the hospital due to progressive bilateral lower limb swelling secondary to worsening acute kidney injury. On work up, renal ultrasonography showed enlarged right kidney measuring 20*13 cm with multiple complex hypoechoic lesions largest 10 cm, with suspected etiology of xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis (xgp). On history the patient wasn’t complaining from any right sided abdominal/flank pain, hematuria, weight loss or any urinary symptoms.

 

History of anemia hb 7.5, been evaluated previously by hematologist, with bone marrow biopsy and flow cytometry, which ruled out mds and myeloproliferative disorder. Further imaging was done, computed tomography (ct) of the abdomen and pelvis without intravenous contrast due to the impaired renal function, showed abnormal appearing right kidney, with multiple cystic and dense appearing regions measuring 17 cm in length, with retroperitoneal, enlarged lymph nodes adjacent to the ivc up to 3 cm.

 

In addition, ct chest showed suspicious pulmonary nodules for metastasis, a trial of ir guided drainage of the suspected abscess vs mass was done, which was inconclusive for any malignancy. Laboratory results are shown in (table 1).

Table 1. Laboratory results

 

 

Normal range

Hb

7.5 g/dl

13.5-17 g/dl

Mcv

87 fl

80-100  fl

Serum iron

16 mcg/dl

65-175 mcg/dl

Ferritin

996 ng/ ml

24-336 ng/ ml

Iron saturation

12.7 %

 20-50%

Tibc

 126 mcg/dl

250-450 mcg/dl

Ldh

99 u/l

125-220 u/l

Esr

98 mm/hr

 0-20 mm/hr

Crp

19.8 mg/l

<10mg/l

Creatinine clearance

30 ml/min

>90 ml/min

 

Renal nuclear scan (99 m mag3 scan) showed negligible right kidney function, which supported the decision to proceed with nephrectomy. Pathological exam of the right radical nephrectomy showed poorly differentiated sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma with focal rhabdoid features, involving the right entire kidney with extension into the renal sinus and perirenal fat with extensive necrosis, focal tumor invasion into the renal vein, but not lumen, negative extension into the adrenal gland and ureteral resection margin with staghorn calculus of the renal pelvis with abscess formation.

Positive right retroperitoneal lymph node for poorly differentiated sarcomatoid, and rhabdoid rcc, infiltrating, fibroadipose tissue and regional blood vessels. Tumor markers with positive for, ck7, vimentin, ae1/ae3, pax8, cd10, negative for ck20, rcc, p40, gata-3.  Pathological stage pt3a n1, mx (figures 1 and 2)
      

Figure 1. Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis with oral contrast.

Showing multiple cystic and solid appearing areas, dense calcifications in the inferior aspect.
        
Figure 2. Histological findings

A: h/e stain, tumor shows moderate atypical spindle cells forming fascicles and rhabdoid features with no epithelial component, b: pax8 slide, c: positive for vimentin

 

The decision was made to refer the patient to a highly specialized cancer center due to the poor prognosis and requirement of an experienced center to tackle such an aggressive tumor, to our best current knowledge the patient passed away after 2 months of diagnosis and didn’t receive any treatment.

 

Discussion

Rcc is the most common kidney cancer, accounts for ~ 90% of all kidney cancer cases. In 2023, the estimated incidence of rcc is 81,800, resulting in nearly 14,890 of annual deaths9 according to the classical histopathological classification, rcc can be classified into three main groups: clear cell carcinoma (ccrcc ) which accounting for 75% of cases, papillary renal cell carcinoma (prcc) making up 15–20% of cases, and chromophobe cell renal carcinoma (chrcc) representing 5% of cases10.  Multiple grading systems have been used to stratify rcc [11] the who/isup grading system, introduced as a replacement for the fuhrman grading system for rcc, relies on nucleolar prominence alone to identify grade 1 to 3 tumors. Conversely, extreme nuclear pleomorphism, sarcomatoid morphology, rhabdoid morphology are utilized to identify grade 4 tumors12,13. Tumor grade has been considered an independent prognostic factor for rcc, where higher grades carry worse prognosis14.

 

Both sarcomatoid and rhabdoid rcc can arise in any type of rcc, more commonly in ccrcc, sarcomatoid dedifferentiation accounts up to 15% of rcc cases and the incidence of rhabdoid transformation within rcc is 4%15,13 with a mean age of early 6015

 

Multiple genetic alterations that are alterations independent of those fundamental to original rcc tumor formation have been identified in sarcomatoid and rhabdoid differentiation these genetic alterations include chromosomal rearrangements such as loss of chromosomes  9q, 15q, 18p/q and 22q[16], gains of 1q and 8q have been associated with metastatic disease17,18 in sarcomatoid case, in rhabdoid tumors loss of bap1 or pbrm1 on chromosome 3p has been also noticed19-21 and  loss of chromosome 9, loss of chromosome 11q and loss of chromosome 17p22. These genetic alterations have been associated with poor outcome in renal cell carcinoma with rhabdoid and sarcomatoid features22-24, it tends to have an aggressive behavior with high tendency for early metastasis, causing a rapidly fatal outcome with a median survival rate of 8 in rhabdoid rcc25 and 4-12 months in sarcomatoid rcc. 

 

Management of stage i disease is primarily surgical with either partial or radical nephrectomy, more frequent surveillance imaging studies are recommended post-surgery in srcc patients26. Radical nephrectomy is preferred in locoregional rcc with sarcomatoid features, though even with early surgical management in localized srcc; patients faced a 72% recurrence rate at a median time of recurrence of 26.2 months27, for patients with advanced disease; cytoreductive nephrectomy is recommended, as it showed improved survival with a median of 10.2 months in comparison to 5.5 months in patients who did not undergo surgery28. No benefit of radiotherapy on overall survival was demonstrated in comparison to surgical management alone29. Systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy failed to demonstrate improved survival for patients with srccs, while targeted therapy with vegf inhibitors (i.e sunitinib, sorafenib, axitinib, pazopanib, tivozanib or bevacizumab) only showed limited overall response rates of 11-19%, even with combination of cytotoxic and targeted therapy response rates remained modest at best30. This resulted in increasing interest in studying the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Expression of pd1/pdl1 was shown to be higher in srccs (54%) in comparison to non-sarcomatoid rcc (17%), moreover retrospective subgroup analysis from checkmate 214,keynote-426 studies demonstrated higher rates of pdl1 positivity 51%, 74.5–79.6% respectively30,31; therefore multiple trials have been done showing promising results for immune checkpoint inhibitors as a treatment modality for advanced srcc, with 44% mortality risk reduction, and overall response rate of (52.6%) over  sunitinib’s  (20.7%) which was considered the standard of care then32,  systemic therapy with axitinib + pembrolizumab or  ipilimumab + nivolumab or axitinib + avelumab or atezolizumab+bevacizumab  was studied in the keynote-42633 checkmate 21434 ,javelin renal 10135 immotion15136 trials respectively, those therapies persistently showed improved outcomes as demonstrated in subsequent meta analyses30,32.

 

Disclosures

Ethics approval and consent to participate: not applicable

Consent for publication: not applicable

Availability of data and materials: not applicable

Conflicts of interest: no conflict of interest

Funding: not applicable

Acknowledgements: not applicable

 

Authors contributions

Writing, review and editing: shatha elemian, nooredeen isbeih, bader al omour, sawjanya kalluri, amr ramahi,

Supervision and critical review: gunwant guron, hamid shaaban

 

References

1.  Eble jn, sauter g, epstein j, sesterhenn i. World health organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. 2004;68-69.

2.     Kovacs g, akhtar m, beckwith bj, et al. The heidelberg classification of renal cell tumours. J pathol 1997;183(2):131-133.

3.     Padala sa, barsouk a, thandra kc, et al. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. World j oncol 2020;11(3):79-87.

4.   Shuch b, said j, la rochelle jc, et al. Cytoreductive nephrectomy for kidney cancer with sarcomatoid histology—is up-front resection indicated and, if not, is it avoidable?. J urol 2009;182(5):2164-2171.

5.     Delahunt b. Sarcomatoid renal carcinoma: the final common dedifferentiation pathway of renal epithelial malignancies. Pathology 1999;31(3):185-190.

6.   Shuch b, amin a, armstrong aj, et al. Understanding pathologic variants of renal cell carcinoma: distilling therapeutic opportunities from biologic complexity. European urology 2015;67(1):85-97.

7.   Störkel s, eble jn, adlakha k, et al. Classification of renal cell carcinoma: workgroup no. 1. Cancer: interdisciplinary international journal of the american cancer society 1997;80(5):987-989.

8.    Sugimoto m, kohashi k, itsumi m, et al. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition in clear cell renal cell carcinoma with rhabdoid features. Pathobiology 2016;83(6):277-286.

9.    Siegel rl, miller kd, wagle ns. Cancer statistics, 2023. Ca: a cancer journal for clinicians 2023;73(1):17-48.

10.  Moch h, amin mb, berney dm, et al. The 2022 world health organization classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs-part a: renal, penile, and testicular tumours. European urology 2022;82(5):458-468.

11.   Knight da, stadler wm. Prognostic factors in localized renal cell cancer. Bju international 2007;99(5b):1212-1216.

12.   Dagher j, delahunt b, rioux-leclercq n, et al. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: validation of world health organization/international society of urological pathology grading. Histopathology 2017;71(6):918-925.

13.   Delahunt b, cheville jc, martignoni g, et al. The international society of urological pathology (isup) grading system for renal cell carcinoma and other prognostic parameters. Am j surg pathol 2013;37(10):1490-1504.

14.   Xiao q, yi x, guan x, et al. Validation of the world health organization/international society of urological pathology grading for chinese patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Transl androl urol 2020;9(6):2665-2674.

15.   Gökden n, nappi o, swanson pe, et al. Renal cell carcinoma with rhabdoid features. Am j surg pathol 2000;24(10):1329-1338.

16.   Ito t, pei j, dulaimi e, et al. Genomic copy number alterations in renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid features. J urol 2016;195:852-858.

17.  Gronwald j, strokel, holtgreve-grez, et al. Comparison of dna gains and losses in primary renal clear cell carcinomas and metastatic sites: importance of 1q and 3p copy number changes in metastatic events. Cancer res 1997;57(3):481-487.

18. Klatte t, kroeger n, rampersaud en, et al. Gain of chromosome 8q is associated with metastases and poor survival of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 2012;118(23):5777-5782.

19.   Li y, lih tm, dhanasekaran sm, et al. Histopathologic and proteogenomic heterogeneity reveals features of clear cell renal cell carcinoma aggressiveness. Cancer cell 2023;41(1):139-163.

20.  Przybycin cg, mckenney jk, reynolds jp, et al. Rhabdoid differentiation is associated with aggressive behavior in renal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathologic analysis of 76 cases with clinical follow-up. The am j surg pathol 2014;38(9):1260-1265.

21.   Peña-llopis s, vega-rubín-de-celis s, liao a, et al. Bap1 loss defines a new class of renal cell carcinoma. Nature genetics 2012;44(7):751-759.

22.   Perrino cm, hucthagowder v, evenson m, kulkarni s, humphrey pa. Genetic alterations in renal cell carcinoma with rhabdoid differentiation. Human pathology 2015;46(1):9-16.

23.   Humphrey pa. Renal cell carcinoma with rhabdoid features. J urology 2011;186(2):675-676.

24.   Lee c, park jw, suh jh, nam kh, moon kc. Histologic variations and immunohistochemical features of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Korean j pathol 2013;47(5):426-432.

25.  Abdou ag, kandil m, elshakhs s, el-dien ms, abdallah r. Renal cell carcinoma with rhabdoid features: an aggressive neoplasm with overexpression of p53. Arch pathol lab med 2007;131(1):102-106.

26.  National comprehensive cancer network (nccn). Kidney cancer version 2.2024-january

27.  Merrill mm, wood cg, tannir nm, et al. Clinically nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation: natural history and outcomes after surgical resection with curative intent. Urol oncol 2015;33(4):166.e21-29.

28.  Heng dy, wells jc, rini bi, et al. Cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastases from renal cell carcinoma: results from the international metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium. Eur urol 2014;66(4):704-710.

29.  Eminaga o, akbarov i, wille s, engelmann u. Does postoperative radiation therapy impact survival in non-metastatic sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma? A seer-based study. Int urol nephrol 2015;47(10):1653-1663.

30.   Blum ka, gupta s, tickoo sk, et al. Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: biology, natural history and management. Nat rev urol 2020;17(12):659-678.

31.   Joseph rw, millis sz, carballido em, et al. Pd-1 and pd-l1 expression in renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid differentiation. Cancer immunol res 20153(12):1303-1307.

32.   Iacovelli r, ciccarese c, bria e, et al. Patients with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma - re-defining the first-line of treatment: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Eur j cancer 2020;136:195-203.

33.   Powles t, plimack er, soulières d, et al. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib monotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (keynote-426): extended follow-up from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet oncol 2020;21(12):1563-1573.

34.   Motzer rj, tannir nm, mcdermott df, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N engl j med 2018;378(14):1277-1290.

35.   Motzer rj, penkov k, haanen j, et al. Avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N engl j med 2019; 21;380(12):1103-1115.

36.   Rini bi, powles t, atkins mb, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sunitinib in patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (immotion151): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019;15;393(10189):2404-2415.