6360abefb0d6371309cc9857
This study builds upon previous research that has demonstrated the hypothesis suggesting the Turin Shroud (TS), also referred to as the Holy Shroud, is a medieval artistic production to be medically implausible
Beyond the medical considerations, the TS exhibits a double-body image imprint. This phenomenon remains unexplained in its entirety and has not been successfully reproduced in a laboratory setting, even with the most advanced and sophisticated modern techniques.
This research extends the critical analysis of this hypothesis, which continues to be widely disseminated in popular media, by examining the technical and procedural challenges a Hypothetical Artist (HA) would have faced in attempting to produce the observed double-body image on the TS.
This research extends the critical analysis of this hypothesis, which continues to be widely disseminated in popular media, by examining the technical and procedural challenges a Hypothetical Artist (HA) would have faced in attempting to produce the observed double-body image on the TS.
This study's primary motivation stems from the author’s extensive research on the TS, spanning more than twenty-five years of university-level scientific investigation. Based on this research, the author asserts the authenticity of the TS, as the body of supporting evidence is substantial, while no verifiable data has been identified that would suggest otherwise.
Following a summary of the medical procedures theoretically required for an artist to produce such an imprint, this study further examines, with experimental results too, the even more complex and implausible technical operations that a hypothetical artist would have needed to undertake to produce the TS’s double-body image-an outcome that remains, even with modern scientific advancements, effectively "impossible" to replicate.
Keywords: Turn shroud; Body image; Corona discharge, Pigments, Radioactivity; Bloodstains; Hemopericardium; Resurrection; Work of art; Middle-ages; Authenticity
Introduction
A recent study¹ has
demonstrated that, from a medical perspective, it is virtually impossible for a
medieval artist to have produced the bloodstains observed in correspondence
with the double-body image on the Turin Shroud (TS).
These stains, which exhibit distinct
morphological variations, can only be coherently explained by considering the
TS as having been wrapped around a human body that underwent severe torture and
crucifixion in accordance with execution practices of Roman types, as described
in the Christian Holy Bible (CHB).
Moreover, specific characteristics of these bloodstains, such as the absence of smearing, further suggest the presence of a phenomenon that remains scientifically unexplained, potentially pointing to a miraculous occurrence. While the prior study focused solely on assessing the feasibility of a medieval artist replicating these medical characteristics, this article expands the scope of the analysis to a broader context, addressing the theoretical possibility of any artist, from any historical period, being capable of producing the observable features of the TS.
Pope Julius II officially approved the Mass and Office of the TS in 1506 because he considered the TS to be the burial cloth that enwrapped the body of Jesus Christ following His crucifixion, approximately two millennia ago1. Furthermore, due to its contact with the blood of Christ, Pope Julius II asserted that the TS should not only be venerated but also revered as an object of adoration10.
Recent analyses of blood samples collected from the TS2-4 have provided novel insights into the physiological state of Jesus Christ during His Passion, crucifixion and entombment described in the CHB.
One of the key conclusions emerging from this research is the hypothesis concerning the mode of Christ’s departure from the TS following the estimated 30 to 40 hours post-mortem. The study proposes a novel interpretation based on the concept of material transparency, demonstrating that Jesus' body came out of the TS in a way that did not touch the integrity of the cloth (Figure 1). The TS remains an unparalleled object of study at the intersection of archaeology, engineering, forensic science and theology4-8.
Figure 1: Upper frontal image of the TS (G. Enrie, 1931, digitally improved by the author)
The TS6-8 is a handcrafted linen textile woven in a 3:1 herringbone twill pattern, measuring approximately 4.4 m (14.4 ft) in length and 1.1 m (3.6 ft) in width. The cloth bears two full length, front and dorsal images of a human figure inexplicably impressed10-16 upon the fabric.
Recent analyses of blood samples collected from the TS2-4 have provided novel insights into the physiological state of Jesus Christ during His Passion, crucifixion and entombment.
After examining the innumerable scientific and historical data, the author is convinced that the TS is indeed the authentic Shroud of Jesus Christ1–4.
Historical analyses
provide further indications of the TS's antiquity and authenticity; numismatic
studies17 have identified clear
correspondence between the facial image on the TS and artistic depictions of
Christ on Byzantine coins dating from the 7th century AD onward.
After disappearing following the Sack of Constantinople in 1204, the Relic known as the "Shroud of Christ" reemerged in Europe in 1353 in Lirey, France. Historical records made the beginning of its well-documented presence in Western Europe.
In 1532, while housed in the Sainte-Chapelle of Chambéry, France, the TS sustained damage in a fire evident on the cloth still today. In 1578, the TS was transferred to Turin, Italy, where it has since been preserved, except for brief periods during times of war.
In 1988, radiocarbon
dating of the TS yielded an erroneous date range of 1260–1390 AD19. This result remains a subject of ongoing
debate19-23, with multiple studies
challenging its reliability due to very probable contamination especially
caused by environmental factors.
Recent findings, including the detection of Beta radioactivity and fluorescence in the bloodstains on the TS1-3,24, further confirm the inaccuracy of the radiocarbon dating results. These discoveries suggest that neutron reactions related to the body image formation may have skewed the radiocarbon measurements.
The presence of selective radioactivity detected in the TS1-3 strongly indicates that the 1988 radiocarbon dating results are biased by an intense neutron flux that altered the isotopic composition of the linen fibers, leading to a younger apparent radiocarbon age. Such a neutron flux could be easily associated with the Resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Before addressing the currently insurmountable issue of the formation of the "impossible" body image—an aspect that will be discussed in detail later—this article first synthetically examines1-4 the physical condition of Jesus Christ as inferred from forensic analysis of the TS. It also synthesizes the extremely complex and medically implausible procedures a Hypothetical Artist (HA) would have had to execute to replicate the highly specific and anatomically accurate details observed on the TS.
AUTHENTICITY OF THE TURIN
SHROUD
Authenticity
of the TS is often understood to mean different concepts that are discussed in
Ref1. Here, the intended concept is
that the TS wrapped the body of Jesus Christ, who was severely scourged,
crowned with thorns, crucified and died before being resurrected. His image was
transferred to the TS through a release of energy during the Resurrection,
resulting in an indelible double body image that remains visible even after two
millennia.
Ref.1, basing on Refs.6 too, also critically compares the claims in support
of the medieval work of art hypothesis for the TS with the strong points in
support of authenticity, thus highlighting how weak the art hypothesis is. The
scientific literature highlights numerous contributions in favor of the
authenticity also reported in Refs.1,5,25,26.
The author has performed several experiments27,28 wrapping various statues and mannequins with semi-transparent copies, even life-size, of the TS, both to study the characteristics of the wrapping of the Relic and to determine the type of distortions present in the body image of the TS caused by the wrapping of a fabric with a three-dimensional body (Figure 2).
In fact, details of distortions emerged, especially in reference to the chest and legs, that no artist would have thought of reproducing if he had not conducted experiments in wrapping three-dimensional human bodies. It was impossible for an artist to impress all those characteristics of the blood (microcytes, creatinine, radioactivity, fluorescence, etc.) that were extremely particular even at a microscopic level when, in the Middle Ages, the microscope (invented in 1590) was not yet known.
Figure
2:
Experiments performed by the author wrapping various statues with
semi-transparent copies of the TS to study body image distortions
MEDICAL
NOTES ON THE PHYSICAL STATUS OF JESUS
We believe it is
useful to synthetically consider the particular state of Jesus wrapped in the
TS before proceeding to the analysis of the formation of the body image. Refs.1-4,29-34 confirm
the presence of blood consistent with the typical torture wounds suffered by
Jesus.
In particular, Ref.3, in addition to the unusual reddish color of type A blood, notes that this blood is mixed with earthy material typical of Jerusalem and is composed of microcytes measuring between 0.3 and 2 micrometers. It, therefore confirms the severe uremia due to the flagellation of the kidneys that Jesus suffered and the consequent difficulty in exchanging oxygen, which caused extremely labored breathing. Creatinine particles (from 50 to 200 nm) found in this blood confirm the atrocious torture suffered by Jesus, also described in the CHB. Refs.1,4, therefore, reconstruct the sequence of events and pathologies that led to the painful death of Jesus on the cross, culminating in a heart attack followed by hemopericardium.
The heart disease ("crepacuore" in Italian), caused by psychological stress, began at the Last Supper [John 13:1-3] and was accentuated in the Garden of Gethsemane, where Jesus manifested hematidrosis [Luke 22:44]. He was then severely beaten [Mark 15:19, Isaiah 50:6] and subjected to a heavy flagellation that caused severe hypovolemia with significant traumatic insult to the heart1,2. The heavy cross accentuated the congestive heart failure, worsening the cardiovascular dysfunction. Renal failure causing microcytic anemia with consequent tachycardia and coagulopathy caused by blood loss, hypovolemic shock and severe dehydration [John 19:28] further burdened the heart.
The
cardiac lesions then also increased the following generated tonic and clonic
contractions. Congestive heart failure, accentuated by the spiritual agony
suffered by Jesus for the insults received [Psalm 69, 20], increased the stress
that caused a pericardial effusion with consequent hemopericardium (not to be assumed
with Takotsubo pathology, sometimes confused as a cause of death36,37). Incidentally, death by hemopericardium
associated with severe chest pain is consistent with the loud cry that Jesus uttered
shortly before dying [Mark 15:37].
After death, the body of Jesus in evident rigor mortis26,38,39 consistent with the position assumed on the cross27,40, was wrapped in the TS. Analyses show that the body remained wrapped in the TS for only 30-40 hours because there were no signs of putrefaction on the cloth. The lack of smearing in the bloodstains transferred in the liquid state demonstrates that the body was not tampered with or moved.
Combining
these facts, it can be deduced that the body of Jesus passed through the TS
without materially compromising it1,2,4.
The perfect congruence between the CHB, which extensively mentions the
Resurrection of Christ, suggests that an intense form of light-energy made the
human body transparent to matter1,2,4.
Extending this hypothesis, one can similarly explain how the Baby Jesus came
out of the womb of the Mother, according to the Marian dogma of the "Virgin before, during and after the
birth"41.
MEDICAL
IMPOSSIBILITY FOR A WORK OF ART BASED ON BLOOD EVIDENCE
In
addition to solving the problem of the impression of the indelible body image
on the linen fabric that will be considered later to obtain the result that we
observe on the TS, we must summarize the medical conditions reported in Ref.1, necessary to obtain the particular
bloodstains.
From
the TS, we know that it wrapped a corpse that released particular bloodstains;
to obtain such a result, a HA would have had to perform the following very
complicated and illogical explanation operations.
The HA, aided by various accomplices, would have had to murder a person after having severely tortured him with flagrums and a crown of thorns. Since he would not have been able to obtain the perfect result seen on the TS at the first tentative, the HA would have had to perform various preliminary experiments becoming therefore a multiple murderer-torturer.
With heavy torture, the HA would have had to seriously compromise the kidneys that would not have filtered the urea; this, released into the blood, would have had to make the red blood cells microcytes with consequent serious breathing difficulties and tachycardia due to reduction of oxygen exchange.
Then the HA would have had to nail the victim to a cross-causing death by hemopericardial tamponade. In the next time of less than 40 hours the HA would have to wrap the victim in a radioactive burial shroud and then not move the corpse from its initial position for several hours to allow its wounds to drip more blood onto the linen cloth.
BODY
IMAGE FEATURES OF THE TS
To
understand the extreme difficulty for a HA to reproduce the body image of TS,
one must first remember the following very particular characteristics that even
today do not seem possible to produce together.
Among the various particular features of the TS body image, also reported in Refs.6,7,10,12,16,40, the author believes that the Evidence, En (where “n” is the Evidence number), noted below, taken from Table 1 of Ref.11 (where the number Cn is here indicated in brackets) are sufficient to demonstrate the practical impossibility for a HA to reproduce the image.
Evidence at a macroscopic level:
Figure
3: Reference
non-image sample of the TS
Figure
4:
Striations (E8) of the image-threads: on the top, detail of the TS eye (M.
Evans ME20, ©STERA Inc. kind permission of B. Schwortz), where also a crevice
appears; on the bottom, for comparison striations obtained with Corona
Discharge (CD) experiments.
Figure
5:
Crevices (E9) of the image-threads: on the top, detail of the TS foot (M. Evans
ME16, ©STERA Inc. kind permission of B. Schwortz); on the bottom, for
comparison crevices obtained with CD experiments
Figure
6. On
the top, image and non-image TS fiber coming from STuRP-1EB sticky tape (calf
area). On the bottom, image fibers colored with iron oxide pigments, according
to E. Craig's technique described in Ref.11
In
reference to Evidence E4, Ref.3 (Fig.
6.2) has further highlighted the fact that scourge wounds appear outside the
body image (shoulder), thus showing the clear contrast between an extremely
intelligent (and murderous) HA who would have obtained an image that is still
not reproducible today and at the same time a HA who instead made a big mistake
in tracing the bloodstains on the outside of the human body. However, this can
be explained if one thinks of an image formation using CD (Corona Discharge)15,16.
HYPOTHESES
FORMULATED TO EXPLAIN THE TS BODY IMAGE
After
Secondo Pia published the first photograph of the TS in 1898, countless
hypotheses were formulated on the formation of the body image without managing
a complete explanation. The most interesting ones, reported in Ref.12, are synthesized below.
P. Vignon, in 1898, hypothesized that the image resulted from contact with a living body smeared with chalk. In 1900, A. Loth was the first to propose electrical energy as the primary source for forming the image, consisting of lightning.
R.
Colson improved Vignon's hypothesis shortly after, describing a chalk mold
covered with zinc dust placed on a photographic plate and Vignon, in 1902,
proposed another hypothesis based on the formation of the image due to the
emanation of ammonia vapors produced by a corpse. Several scholars then
improved this hypothesis; first of all, R. Rogers who, at the end of the
twentieth century, referred to it as the Maillard reaction between amines and
sugars.
J. Volkringer, studying the imprints produced in old herbals by the pressure of leaves, proposed a formation caused by direct body-leaf contact.
Other scholars such as G. Judica Cordiglia, M. Moroni, S. Rodante and R. Romanese used sculptures or real human heads soaked in blood, urea, sweat, aloe and myrrh and covered with linen or leather to support the contact hypothesis.
However, detecting the failure of their intent, some researchers, such as M. Alonso, member of Shroud-Science Group (SSG) proposed mixed mechanisms combining the hypothesis of gas diffusion and that of contact.
While until the mid-1900s, several artistic copies were made declaring their origin as that of O. Visone, toward the end of the 1900s, anonymous artistic copies were made trying in vain to demonstrate that a medieval artist could have reproduced the TS. Among these we find E. Craig, J. Nickell, N. Wilson and L. Garlaschelli who used pigments or chemical reagents affixed to the linen fabric and V. Delfino Pesce who used a bas-relief of heated metal. N. Allen instead proposed a particular photographic technique.
A large group of scholars turned their attention to hypotheses based on the emission of particular neutrons, protons or electronic radiation either by the human body wrapped in TS or hypotheses based on the corpse exposed to particular radiative sources. Among these, J.B. Rinaudo proposed a double source of protons (which caused the formation of the image) and neutrons (which caused the rejuvenation of the C-14 age of the cloth), J. Jackson hypothesized a soft UV burst of energy, G. Baldacchini proposed an excimer laser source, G. De Liso proposed a piezoelectric source produced by an earthquake acting on quartz rocks connected to emissions of radon gas.
After
A. Loth, an increasing group of scholars hypothesized that the CD, due to an
intense electric field, could explain the image of the TS. According to O.
Scheuermann and Whanger & Whanger, the body image is due to a source of
energy emanating from Jesus during the Resurrection; F. Lattarulo and G.B.
Judica Cordiglia instead CANCEL independently proposed the hypothesis of a
human body floating in an intense natural electric field perhaps produced by a
neutron flux.
The
Author17 has recently revised a
previous hypothesis, suggesting the formation of the body image in the Divine
Photography Hypothesis (DPH) employing a chemical Maillard reaction based on
the contact between sugars and amines, added to the CD hypothesis generated by
the Holy Fire of Jerusalem (HFJ). The HFJ is a very particular energetic
phenomenon produced by intense electric fields that are repeated annually in
the Holy Sepulcher of Jerusalem for many centuries. This electrical type
phenomenon was necessary to reproduce the image of the TS.
In particular, according to the DPH, the TS wrapped the body of Jesus Christ when He was laid in the Holy Sepulcher of Jerusalem and an oily mixture of myrrh and aloe was used for the burial. These substances, also composed of sugars, would have mixed with the post-mortem fluids exuded by the corpse, such as the urea not filtered into the blood by the kidneys already compromised by flagellation.
During the Resurrection, there was a light very similar to the HFJ and an intense electric field generated a CD. Instantly, the Body of Jesus became materially transparent collapsing the TS on the stone of the sepulcher under the force of gravity.
The electric field of the HFJ produced electrons that activated chemical reactions selectively localized on the fibers closest to the human body and the directionality of the electric field allowed 3D information relative to the human body to be encoded on the TS.
Over time, the invisible defects produced by the Maillard reaction activated by the HFJ energy on the linen fibers oxidized and dehydrated thus producing the darkening of the image now observed.
From
this long list of hypotheses, it emerges how difficult, if not impossible, it
is to try to physically reproduce a body image on linen reflecting all the
particular features listed above (and others omitted in this paper for the sake
of simplicity).
IMPOSSIBILITY
FOR THE BODY IMAGE TO BE A WORK OF ART
We
have seen above that a work of art based on blood evidence is implausible from
a medical point of view. Now let's consider the extreme difficulty a HA would
have in reproducing the double body image observed on the TS independently of
the medical difficulties already mentioned that would be added to those
presented below.
The
Evidence previously listed is divided into two categories: macroscopic type
(E1-E6) and microscopic type (E7-E12).
As regards the macroscopic Evidence it is clear that these are extremely difficult for a HA to apply and, above all, useless and contrary to the artistic result that would be obtained. Why would the very intelligent HA have reproduced, who previously brilliantly resolved all the medical difficulties reported in Ref.1, an image with the gray tones inverted (E1) that would make the result less easy for the observer to understand? And why would he have built an image with 3D information (E2) that is not directly interpretable by the observer? The distortions of the body image (E3), typical of a 3D body wrapping, do not make a credible result and, therefore, should be avoided.
Then, positioning the wounds of a man outside the body image (E4) would be a contradiction typical of an inexperienced artist.
The fact that the image does not have well-defined edges (E5) is not only difficult to obtain artistically but is also contrary to the result the HA wants to obtain. The body image disappears to an observer at a distance of less than one meter (3 feet).
Finally,
obtaining a doubly superficial image (E6) is a truly difficult undertaking for
a HA who would have to backlight the linen fabric to superficially reproduce
the color on the back of the sheet without having any artistic advantage for
the observer.
Turning attention to all E1-E12 Evidence, we formulate two scenarios based on the hypotheses most frequently presented by scholars without considering the already-discussed insurmountable medical aspects. The first refers to the difficulties that a hypothetic painter would encounter and the second refers to the exposure of the human body to an intense energy source.
Hypothetic
painter
To
understand the enormous difficulties that a HA might encounter in obtaining a
body image similar to the TS, let us look at the model in (Figure 6). If
we ideally extract a thread of the TS body image, whose diameter is about 0.25
mm (0.0098 inches) and magnify it about 300 times, we can think of it as
similar to a bundle of drinking straws. Each straw is a flax fiber with a
diameter of about 0.015 mm (0.00059 inches). On one side of the bundle, on its
top, we see a dozen-colored straws next to uncolored straws.
Using a simple painting technique, let us
think of the operations required for a HA to reproduce the E1-E12 Evidence of
the TS listed above on a common linen cloth.
First,
the HA must dip the brush not in the color because there are no pigments on the
threads, but in an acid that can chemically stain the linen. However, the HA
must see what he is painting, so the acid (usually transparent) must be colored
beforehand, even if he must eliminate every trace of that pigment once the work
is finished because there is no colorant on the TS.
Since colored fibers are next to the uncolored ones, the brush must have a single bristle with a diameter no greater than that of a single linen fiber. However, the HA must also color the underlying part of the fiber without coloring the adjacent fibers since the color is uniformly distributed around the circumference of the single image fibers.
Finally, the HA should paint individually in this way the several million image fibers of the TS, thus using a microscope (not existing in the Middle Ages), but simultaneously, through a mirror-and-lenses-system, observing the body image from at least 1 m away, corresponding to 300 m (984 ft) away in the drinking straws model, because when we approach the TS, the body image disappears from view
If
these difficulties seem insoluble today, they seem impossible for a
hypothetical, albeit brilliant, medieval HA.
Figure 7: Drinking straws model to represent macroscopically a TS linen thread
However,
there are still several people in the world who, ignoring (perhaps
intentionally) many of these particular features of the bloody body image of
the TS, declare through the media that they have succeeded in reproducing the
image.
Below is a detailed example that, although illogical, easily convince many people who are not experts on this specific topic. We consider the case of Dale Glover, host of the podcast "Real Seeker" and member of SSG who was interested in providing the author with the experimental results regarding the hypothesis of image formation formulated by HF Hugh Farey member of SSG analyzed them in relation to the E1-E12 Evidence listed above.
Before going into detail, it should be noted that the HF states that TS is still little studied today, ignoring the dozens of publications in important Journals, first of all, Refs.6,7 and therefore, indirectly ignoring the entire group Shroud of Turin Research Project (STuRP) that in 1978 made very detailed scientific studies on TS.
To drastically
simplify the problem of his TS reproduction, HF to be eliminated bypasses all
the practically insurmountable problems related to the presence of the very
particular types of blood by declaring to be eliminated that the problem
associated with the presence of blood on TS is still controversial today.
Thereby, HF shows that he does not know the specific characteristics of TS
blood in Refs.1-5,24 which explained
the reason for the controversies that occurred almost half a century ago in
Refs.33,34.
With reference to this last point, the author takes the opportunity to confirm what is reported in Ref.3 where the Type C blood from the face is preliminarily described. Subsequent analyses confirm the presence of various red blood cells, erythrocytes, of dimensions slightly smaller than those typical of human blood in correspondence with the face, see (Figure 8).
This result confirms that the Type C blood was shed before, due to the flagellation, the kidneys ceased functioning, thus producing an accentuated uremia that shrank the erythrocytes. Consequently, it can be thought that these blood cells can be directly correlated to the hematohidrosis manifested by Jesus in Gethsemane.
HF described the procedure, which is briefly reported below, obtaining the result shown in (Figure 9). Two experiments used a TS-like fabric and a brass bas-relief approximately 10 cm x 10 cm. For the paint, one egg yolk, 50 cm(3) of water, 50 cm(3) of malt vinegar and 0.5 g of yellow ochre were mixed. A swab dipped in the paint then pressed onto the fabric resting on the bas-relief produced the image.
Sample 1 was lightly washed to (hypothetically, author's note) remove surface debris and Sample 2 was washed and scrubbed with a toothbrush to (supposedly, author's note) remove as much pigment as possible. Both samples were then ironed to remove creases.
Figure 9: HF’s Samples 1 (above) and 2 (below) reproducing a 10 cm x 10 cm bas-relief
Let us now analyze the two results obtained by HF, specifying that if only one Evidence among the selected ones, E1-E12, is not satisfied, we must conclude that these results cannot reproduce the body image of the TS.
Let's consider the two results on the front of the Evidence E1-E6 related to a macroscopic level.
E1 (reversed tones) and E2 (3D) can be accepted (Figure 10), but E3 (distortions) are not easy to determine in a bas-relief. E4 (bloodstains) are intentionally forgotten to oversimplify the experiment. E5 (contours), even if the scale effect must be considered, shows contours that are too accentuated to affirm that an image similar to the TS has been reproduced.
Finally, regarding E6 (double superficiality), we find an effect different from that of the TS image. In some areas of the back of the linen fabric, we find some spots consistent with the image of the front side, but these spots do not appear because of a double superficiality. Instead, they appear because the color has been absorbed in the whole thickness of the fabric, thus passing from one side to the other.
Figure 10: 3D effect of the HF’s Samples 1 (above) and 2 (below) reproducing a 10 cm x 10 cm bas-relie
Now, let’s consider the two results on the front of the Evidence E7-E12 related to a microscopic level.
The color is absorbed in an area greater than or equal to one-third of the section of the linen thread of the fabric; therefore, Evidence E7 (crossing threads) is verified in many cases, but Evidence E11 (uppermost portions) is not. Evidence E8 (striations), too, is not verified except in some very rare cases that cannot be considered typical of the result analyzed.
Evidence E9 (crevices) fails; indeed, a position of the color is accentuated in proximity to the protuberances of the thread with respect to the plane of the fabric. This characteristic is also easy to explain because these protuberances are the first to come into contact with the pad impregnated with pigments.
Evidence
E10 (cementation), although not frequent, contrarily to the TS image, is found
above all in the areas of more intense color (Figure 11).
Evidence E12 (uniformly colored) is perhaps the most important way to highlight the complete non-conformity of the proposed method with respect to the characteristics of the TS fibers, which are uniformly colored without showing pigment traces. Figure 11 (similar to what is highlighted in Figure 6 on the bottom) demonstrates that all the Samples analyzed show that the fabric's color is due to the micrometric particles of yellow ochre used as pigment. So, we have to observe the inability of HF to achieve the desired result.
Finally, it should also be noted that all the linen fabric of two Samples 1 and 2 show traces of blackish material near the upper parts of the threads that are absent on the TS linen fabric.
Figure
11:
Yellow ochre pigment on the linen fibers of HF’s Sample 2 showing the evident
difference with the TS body image
In conclusion, it can be stated that the HF’s hypothesis completely fails to reproduce the TS body image (only partial because it completely neglects the bloodstains, see E4) completely fails to reproduce the TS body image.
In synthesis, at the macroscopic level, E5 (contours) is not respected, while at the microscopic level, Evidence E11 (uppermost portions), E8 (striations) and E9 (crevices) are not respected. In addition, E10 (no cementation) is not respected everywhere. However, the most crucial evidence that characterizes the failure of the proposed hypothesis is Evidence E12 (uniformly colored) because particles of yellow ochre used as pigment are evident everywhere.
CONCLUDING
REMARKS
This
article integrates a recent publication1
in which the hypothesis that the TS is the result of a work of art produced by
a medieval artist has been demonstrated to be absurd from a medical
perspective. In addition to the medical aspects, one must also consider the
double body image that cannot be scientifically explained to date.
Therefore, let's consider the sum of the medical difficulties highlighted here in reproducing the double body image. The reader can understand how difficult, if not impossible, it is to reproduce an Object such as the TS and, therefore, understand what absurdities are frequently spread by the media when persons interviewed claim "I reproduced the TS"!
Starting
from the recent discoveries regarding the blood of the TS reported in Ref.1, also integrating them with an important
confirmation regarding the Type C blood preliminarily described in Ref.3 and after having ascertained the perfect
congruence between what has been scientifically found on the TS with what has
been reported by the CHB, the immense suffering voluntarily endured by Jesus
Christ for us men and for our salvation have been summarized here. In
particular, the tortures suffered by Jesus until His death on the cross are
recalled, highlighting the series of pathologies induced by them and explained
in Ref.1.
Among other things, it is recalled that Jesus of the TS was wrapped like a corpse but remained there for no more than about 30-40 hours, that He was crowned King of Redeeming Sorrows with the crown of thorns and that the microcytes found in the bloodstains highlight the respiratory pathology of His last moments on the Cross.
After having summarized, from a medical perspective, how difficult and illogical it is to consider the TS as the product of an artist's work, we moved on to analyze 12 particular pieces of evidence typical of the body image imprinted on the TS that still make it inexplicable and unreproducible today. The most essential hypotheses of image formation have been considered, highlighting the current impossibility of obtaining the desired results
Two hypotheses are then described, practically unrealizable from an experimental point of view. They explain how difficult it is to even think of producing a copy of the TS that respects all the very particular characteristics highlighted therein
Someone, reading the hypotheses described by the author to try to explain the bloodstains on the TS, accused him of having only a lot of fantasy. Now, the same reader will accentuate this accusation even more. The author strongly encourages him and anyone who even thinks something like this to propose something easier to realize experimentally and that allows the achievement of all the desired results herein described.
In conclusion of this discussion, the result provided by HF, who publicly (on the podcast "Real Seeker") claims to have found a procedure to copy the TS is, experimentally analyzed, showing instead how far this result is from the actual production of a copy of the most important Relic of Christianity
Assuming but not admitting that the HA had somehow managed to copy at least in part the TS, the following questions arise: why would the HA have made superhuman efforts to obtain an object that would be only partially understood by scholars of the twenty-first century? Why would the HA want to try to reproduce what he did not know in the Middle Ages, such as radioactivity
The author concludes and makes his own the following concepts expressed by Administrator of SSG Pappas, Administrator of SSG. Through the evidence of the TS, we can help bring other doubters to Christ to avoid a destiny of suffering in hell. Furthermore, the TS provides us with such powerful proof - beyond any reasonable doubt - of the existence of God that believers can transform their "faith" in God into certain knowledge of God, which is infinitely better!
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The
author heartily thanks the late Prof. Don Lieto Massignani, who highly
encouraged the writing of this paper and the Holy Spirit; he also thanks all
the institutions and scholars mentioned in Refs.1,2
and related papers who provided him with material from the TS.
Many thanks to Carol Gregorek, a member of SSG, who, abandoning all her commitments to comply with the urgency posed by the Editor, provided very helpful advice and improved the author’s English language skills.
A
heartful thanks to Theodora Pappas, Administrator of SSG, for the valuable
recommendations furnished.
The
author also thanks Dale Glover of “Real Seekers” and of SSG for his efforts in
providing experimental samples from HF of SSG too.
ETHICAL
STATEMENTS
As
more widely reported in Ref.1 the
author, belonging to the Christian Roman Catholic religion, experienced a
profound strengthening of faith through scientific studies on the TS.
FUNDIN
This
research too was supported by a religious group, reported in Ref.1 that
entrusted the author with the analysis of the so-called "Padre Pio
handkerchief".
CONFLICTS
OF INTEREST
The
author declares no conflict of interes
REFERENCES
1. Fanti G. Turin Shroud:
Medical Impossibility for a Medieval Work of Art. Annal Cas Rep Rev: ACRR-424
2025.
2. Fanti G. Turin Shroud:
Insights’ Review Confirming Biblical Reports About Etiology of Jesus Christ’s
Death and Resurrection. Medi Clin Case Rep J 2024;2(4):544-556.
3. Fanti G. New Insights
on Blood Evidence from the Turin Shroud Consistent with Jesus Christ’s
4. Tortures. Arch Hematol
Case Rep Rev 2024;9(1):001-015.
5. Fanti G. Why is the
Turin Shroud Authentic? Glob J Arch and Anthropol 2018;7(2):555707.
6. Fanti G. Why is the
Turin Shroud Not Fake? Glob J Arch and Anthropol 2018;7(3):555715.
7. Jumper EJ, Adler AD,
Jackson JP, Pellicori SF, Heller JH, Druzik JR. A comprehensive examination of
the various stains and images on the Shroud of Turin, Archaeological Chemistry
III, ACS Advances in Chemistry 1984;205;447-476.
8. Schwalbe LA, Rogers RN.
Physics and chemistry of the Shroud of Turin, a summary of the 1978
investigation. Analytical Chemical Acta 1982;135(1):3-49.
9. Jumper Eric J and
Robert W. Mottern, Scientific investigation of the Shroud of Turin. Applied
Optics 1980;19(12):1909-1912.
10. Garello E. The Shroud
and the Popes, Corsi Ed. Turin 1984.
11. Jackson J, Propp K,
Rebecca Jackson R, Koumis A, Bertrand J. The Shroud: A Critical Summary of
Data, Observations and Hypotheses. Turin Shroud Center of Colorado, USA.
12. Fanti G. Hypotheses
regarding the formation of the body image on the Turin Shroud. A critical
compendium J Imaging Sci 2011.
13. Fanti G, Botella JA, Di
Lazzaro P, Heimburger T, Schneider R, Svensson N. Microscopic and Macroscopic
Characteristics of the Shroud of Turin Image Superficiality, J of Imaging Sci.
Technol 2010;54.
14. Fanti G, Maggiolo R. The
Double Superficiality of the Frontal Image of the Turin Shroud. J of Optics A:
Pure and Applied Optics 2004;6:491-503.
15. De Caro L, Fanti G, New
Insights on the Turin Shroud’s Body Image: Face Image at Different Wavelengths
and its Double Superficiality. Scientia et Fides 2024;12:151-184.
16. Fanti G. Can Corona
Discharge explain the body image formation of the Turin Shroud? J Imaging
Science Technol 2010;54(2).
17. Fanti G. Holy Fire and
Body Image of the Holy Shroud: Divine Photography Hypothesis. World Scientific
News 2023;176:104-120.
18. Fanti G. Byzantine Coins
Influenced by the Shroud of Christ. Jenny Stanford Publishing Pte. Ltd.
Singapore 2022.
19. Damon PE, Donahue DJ,
Gore BH, et al. Radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin. Nature
1989;337:611-615.
20. Rogers RN, Studies on
the Radiocarbon Sample from the Shroud of Turin, Thermochimica Acta
2005;425:189-194.
21. McAvoy T. On Radiocarbon
Dating of the Shroud of Turin. Int J Archaeol 2021;9(2):34-44.
22. Schwalbe L, Walsh B. On
Cleaning Methods and the Raw Radiocarbon Data from the Shroud of Turin. Int J
Archaeol 2021;9(1):10-16.
23. Riani M, Atkinson AC,
Fanti G, Crosilla F. Regression analysis with partially labelled regressors:
carbon dating of the Shroud of Turin. J Statistical Computing 2012.
24. Phillips TJ. Shroud
irradiated with neutrons? Nature 1989;337.
25. Fanti G. Could an
anomaly in Turin Shroud blood reopen the 1988-radiocarbon-dating result? World
Scientific News 2021;162:102-119.
26. Jackson J. Is the image
on the Shroud due to a process heretofore unknown to modern science? Shroud
Spectrum Int 1991;34:3-29.
27. Faccini B, Carreira E,
Fanti G, De Palacios J, Villalain J. “The Death of The Shroud Man: An Improved
Review”, Proc. of Shroud Science Group International Conference the Shroud Of
Turin: Perspectives on A Multifaceted Enigma, Ohio State University 2008;14-17.
28. Fanti G, Basso R,
Bianchini G. Turin Shroud: Compatibility Between a Digitized Body Image and a
Computerized Anthropomorphous Manikin. J Imaging Sci Technol
2010;54(5):050503-1/8.
29. Bevilacqua M, Concheri
G, Concheri S, Fanti G, Rodella S. Rigor Mortis and News obtained by the Body’s
Scientific Reconstruction of the Turin Shroud Man. Peertechz J Forensic 2018.
30. Heller JH, Adler AD.
Blood on the Shroud of Turin. Applied Optics 1980;19(16);27422744.
31. Heller JH, Adler AD. A
Chemical Investigation of the Shroud of Turin. Canadian Society of Forensic
Science J 1981;14(3):81-103.
32. Baima Bollone PL.
Indagini identificative su fili della Sindone. Giornale della Accademia di
Medicina di Torino 1982;228-239.
33. Lucotte Gerard. Vérités
sul le Saint Suaire, Atelier Fol’fer, BP 20047, 28260 Anet 2010.
34. Fanti G, Zagotto G.
Blood reinforced by pigments in the reddish stains of the Turin Shroud. J
Cultural Heritage 2017;25:113-120.
35. Fanti G. A Reexamination
of the Pigment-Reinforcement Hypothesis of the Turin Shroud’s Bloodstains.
World Scientific News 2024;9(1):1-15.
36. McCrone WC. Judgement
Day for the Turin Shroud. The Microscope Pub. Chicago, USA 1997.
37. Mangione S. Did Jesus
Die of Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy? A Medical Revisiting of the Gospels. J Gen
Intern Med 2024.
38. Fanti G, Ascolese M.
Commentary on “Did Jesus Die of Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy? A Medical Revisiting
of the Gospels. J Gen Intern Med 2025.
39. Sugatha M, Venkata R.
Assessment of time since death using forensic autopsies based on the presence
of rigor mortis- a cross-sectional study. Int J Contemporary Medical Research.
40. Pappas TA. Beyond
Imagination: Evidence of Rigor Mortis and Cadaveric Spasm on the Shroud of
Turin. Medi Clin Case Rep J 2024;2(4):603-616.
41. Fanti G, Malfi P. The
Shroud of Turin, First Century After Christ! Jenny Stanford Pub Singapore 2020.
42. Catechism of the
Catholic Church - Latin Text copyright. Libreria Editrice Vaticana 1993.