thesis findings, these
studies suggest that safe, structured arousal outlets may serve as protective
buffers against withdrawal-related depression.
Integrative conceptual modelThe proposed model links:
• Military service → calibration to high-arousal states.
• Transition to civilian life → withdrawal-like dysphoria (adrenaline dependence).
• Psychopathology → PTSD and depression amplify irritability and withdrawal.
• Parenting disruptions → diminished warmth, harsh or inconsistent practices.
• Child outcomes → elevated internalizing/externalizing symptoms.
• Buffers → safe, prosocial arousal outlets improve parental affect regulation and family functioning.
Implications for VA and military leadership
The findings have important implications for both the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and military leadership in shaping prevention and support initiatives. Veterans’ mental health cannot be addressed solely through individual-focused treatment; it requires a systemic, family-centered approach.
Expand family-centered programming
• Programs such as FOCUS demonstrate measurable improvements in family functioning and child adjustment9,10. Scaling these programs across bases and VA clinics would ensure broader access.
• Incorporating family psychoeducation on PTSD, depression and adrenaline withdrawal could reduce stigma and promote early recognition of risk factors.
Integrate safe arousal outlets
• Military leaders and VA providers should recognize the role of adrenaline withdrawal in post-service adjustment. Partnerships with community organizations (e.g., motorsport, adventure therapy, structured physical training) can provide safe outlets for veterans to regulate arousal.
• Embedding these programs within reintegration services could buffer withdrawal-related depression and improve family stability.
Enhance transition planning
• Separation and retirement programs should assess veterans not only for employment readiness but also for psychological and physiological adjustment to reduced adrenaline exposure.
• Providing resources for veterans and families to explore high-engagement careers or structured recreation could mitigate risks of depression and relational strain.
Policy and advocacy
• VA disability evaluations could consider adrenaline withdrawal as a contributing factor to depression and PTSD-related impairments, warranting recognition within benefits determinations.
• Military leadership should advocate for research funding focused on family systems, intergenerational transmission of trauma and adrenaline withdrawal as a behavioral addiction framework.
Strengthen family support services
• Child development specialists, family therapists and school-based mental health liaisons should be integrated into VA and military health systems to directly support children of veterans.
• Military leaders can ensure that command climates promote family wellbeing by supporting policies that prioritize parenting leave, spousal mental health and child support services.
Clinical Implications
Clinicians working with veteran families should:
• Screen for adrenaline dependence/withdrawal as part of PTSD and depression assessments.
• Support occupational fit discussions to mitigate withdrawal symptoms.
• Offer family-centered, trauma-informed programs (e.g., FOCUS).
• Monitor child functioning in coordination with pediatric providers.
Future Research Directions
Future research should:
• Conduct longitudinal studies tracing adrenaline withdrawal and parenting outcomes over time.
• Incorporate children’s perspectives via mixed-methods designs.
• Explore neurobiological mechanisms (e.g., HPA axis dysregulation, FKBP5 methylation)12-14.
• Evaluate structured arousal interventions (e.g., motorsport, adventure therapy) through controlled trials.
• Examine cumulative effects of pre-military trauma on veteran-parent functioning.
• Compare occupational and family-level interventions to determine optimal strategies for resilience.
References
1. Heirene RM, Shearer D,
Roderique-Davies G, Mellalieu SD. Addiction in extreme sports: An exploration
of withdrawal states in rock climbers. J Behavioral Addictions
2016;5(2):332-341.
2. Jackson-Campos
MR. Veteran adrenaline addiction and depression in the civilian workforce
(Master’s thesis, Purdue University Global). Purdue University Global Library
2025.
3. Creech
SK, Misca G. Parenting with PTSD: A review of research on the influence of PTSD
on parent–child functioning in military and veteran families. Front Psychol
2017;8:1101.
4. Goodman
SH, Rouse MH, Connell AM, et al. Maternal depression and child psychopathology:
Research evidence. J Abnormal Child Psychology 2011;39(3):351-361.
5. Ivanova MY, Gentzler AL, Cunningham NR, et
al. Associations of parental depression with children’s internalizing
and externalizing problems. J Clin Child Adolescent Psych 2022;52(S1):S1-S19.
6. Senecal
G, Lopez Adorno R, LaFleur R, McNamara K. Autoethnographic family case study:
Combat veteran PTSD and its effects on familial dynamics, parenting and
marriage. J Veterans Studies 2022;8(3):140-150.
7. Wang
X, Liu Q, Merrin GJ, Keller A, Yoon D. Harsh parenting among veterans: Parents’
military-related PTSD, mentalization and pre-military trauma. Front Psychol
2023.
8. May K, Van
Hooff M, Doherty M, Carter D. Experiences of parental PTSD for children aged
9–17 in military and emergency responder families. J Child Family Studies
2023;32:3816-3834.
9. Beardslee WR, Klosinski LE,
Saltzman W, et al. Family-centered preventive intervention for military
families: The FOCUS program. American J Public Health 2011;101(12):2165-2172.
10. Lester P, Liang LJ, Milburn N,
et al. Evaluation of a family-centered preventive intervention for military
families: A randomized effectiveness trial. Am J Public Health 2016;106(2):180-188.
11. Serfioti D, Hunt N, et al. Extreme
sport as an intervention for physically injured military veterans: The example
of competitive motorsport. Disability Rehabilitation 2022;44(24):7566-7574.
12. Yehuda
R, Daskalakis NP, Lehrner A, et al. Holocaust exposure induced
intergenerational effects on FKBP5 methylation. Biological Psychiatry 2016;80(5):372-380.
13. Yehuda R, Lehrner A.
Intergenerational transmission of trauma effects: Putative role of epigenetic
mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacology 2018;43(1):1-12.
14. Wadji DL, Yilmaz O, Cernis E. Child
maltreatment and NR3C1 exon 1F methylation: A link to HPA-axis regulation.
Child Abuse Neglect 2021;120:105192