Full Text

Research Article

Comparative Study of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology and Histopathology Results of Salivary Gland Swelling in St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia


Abstract

Background: Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) is a widely accepted, safe, and cost-effective diagnostic tool for evaluating salivary gland swellings. It helps differentiate between benign, inflammatory, and malignant lesions, aiding in surgical planning and management.

Objective: This study aimed to compare FNAC results with histopathology findings to assess the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC in evaluating salivary gland swellings at St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Methods: A four-year hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with salivary gland swellings who underwent both FNAC and histopathology at St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College from January 1, 2019, to August 30, 2022. Data were collected using a standardized questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS version 27. Sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated using histopathology as the gold standard.

Results: Of the 475 FNACs performed, 110 cases had correlating histopathology results. The parotid gland was the most commonly affected site (46.4%), followed by the submandibular gland (42.7%) and minor salivary glands (10.9%). FNAC demonstrated high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy: 100%, 98.83%, and 99.09% for non-neoplastic lesions; 96.4%, 92.6%, and 94.5% for benign neoplasms; and 83.3%, 95.5%, and 94.54% for malignant neoplasms, respectively.

Conclusion: FNAC is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tool for evaluating salivary gland swellings. It is reliable for preoperative planning and can help avoid unnecessary surgical interventions.


Keywords: Salivary gland, Fine needle aspiration cytology, Histopathology, Diagnostic accuracy


1. Introduction

1.1. Background of the study

Salivary gland swellings can result from tumors, inflammatory processes, or cysts. Salivary gland tumors account for approximately 3% of all head and neck malignancies, with the majority of these neoplasms being benign1,2. Malignant salivary gland tumors represent only 20% of cases, and the annual incidence of salivary gland cancers is reported to be 0.5 to 2 per 100,000 people. These tumors affect both men and women equally, with the majority of cases occurring in the sixth decade of life3. Tumors can develop in both the major and minor salivary glands, with the parotid glands accounting for 80% of major salivary gland tumors, while the palate is the most common site for minor salivary gland tumors4.

Clinical practice has shown that the smaller the salivary gland, the more likely the tumor is malignant. Around 20% to 25% of tumors in the parotid glands are malignant, while this percentage increases to 40% in the submandibular glands, and over 90% of sublingual gland tumors are malignant3,5. The parotid gland accounts for 75% of salivary gland tumors, while the submandibular glands contribute 25%. Minor salivary glands and the sublingual glands account for 8% and 1%, respectively. The most common benign tumor is pleomorphic adenoma, which is predominantly of parotid gland origin. Among malignant tumors, mucoepidermoid carcinoma is the most common, while adenoid cystic carcinoma is the most common malignant tumor in the submandibular and minor salivary glands6.

Non-neoplastic lesions of the salivary glands are often caused by chronic sialadenitis, followed by retention cysts. Salivary gland cystic abnormalities can be classified as either true cysts (e.g., lymphoepithelial cysts) or non-developmental cysts (e.g., retention cysts)7,8.

Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) has proven to be an efficient, simple, and safe method for evaluating salivary gland enlargement. FNAC boasts high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in identifying salivary gland lesions1,2. The sensitivity of FNAC for salivary gland lesions ranges from 86% to 100%, while specificity ranges from 90% to 100%8. The accuracy of FNAC is highly dependent on the experience of both the pathologist and the clinician performing the aspiration1. FNAC is crucial in treatment planning, as it allows clinicians to avoid unnecessary surgeries and reduces healthcare costs9. While open biopsy may provide diagnostic information, it is generally avoided due to its invasiveness, which can complicate subsequent surgical interventions10.

1.2. Statement of the problem

Salivary gland swellings represent a diverse and challenging group of disorders with variable clinical presentations, making accurate diagnosis essential1. While Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) is widely used for the preoperative evaluation of head and neck tumors, its accuracy in diagnosing salivary gland masses remains debated in comparison to other diagnostic modalities. FNAC is a commonly performed, safe, and typically well-tolerated procedure that provides valuable diagnostic information. The primary goal of FNAC in salivary gland swelling is to distinguish between inflammatory and reactive processes, identify benign versus malignant neoplasms, and provide a definitive diagnosis when possible.

The accuracy of FNAC significantly impacts the surgical management of salivary gland swellings. It has been suggested that preoperative FNAC results play a key role in determining the management strategy for salivary gland swellings, including the decision to proceed with surgery. Knowing whether a lesion is malignant or benign in advance can help clinicians tailor surgical approaches, which could potentially delay or expedite intervention. Despite the unknown prevalence of salivary gland swellings in our region, many patients with these swellings present to our institution for diagnosis and management. Given the limited access to advanced imaging modalities such as CT or MRI, clinicians rely heavily on FNAC and clinical examination to guide their decisions. This study aims to correlate FNAC diagnoses with histopathology and assess the sensitivity and specificity of FNAC in diagnosing salivary gland swellings in our institution.

1.3. General objective

The general objective of this study is to compare the FNAC results with histopathology findings of salivary gland swellings in order to assess its diagnostic accuracy among patients who had both FNAC and histopathology results at Saint Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Department of ORL HNS, and the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from January 1, 2019, to August 30, 2022, G.C.

1.4. Specific objectives

The specific objectives of this study are as follows:

To determine the accuracy of FNAC diagnosis of salivary gland swelling when compared with histopathology.

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of FNAC in diagnosing salivary gland swellings in our institution.

To identify the patterns of etiology of salivary gland swellings in our institution.

1.5. Significance of the study

The surgical management of salivary gland swellings is increasingly dependent on preoperative FNAC results. This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of FNAC in diagnosing salivary gland swellings in our institution. These diagnostic metrics will help guide surgeons in determining how much reliance should be placed on FNAC findings in their preoperative decision-making process. By improving the accuracy of preoperative diagnoses, this study may contribute to more informed surgical decisions, optimizing patient outcomes, and potentially reducing unnecessary surgeries.

2. Methods

2.1. Study setting and period

The study was conducted at Saint Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, over the period from January 1, 2019, to August 30, 2022, G.C. Data collection took place from September 1-8, 2022, G.C.

2.2. Study design

This was a hospital-based cross-sectional study conducted on patients admitted to Saint Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, within the Department of ORL HNS and the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, who presented with salivary gland swelling between January 1, 2019, and August 30, 2022, G.C. The study involved comparing FNAC results to histopathology reports for salivary gland swellings. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC by calculating its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy in comparison to histopathology results.

2.3. Study population

The source population included all patients with salivary gland swellings admitted to Saint Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Department of ORL HNS, and the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department from January 1, 2019, to August 30, 2022, G.C. The study population comprised patients who had both FNAC and histopathology results and were diagnosed with salivary gland tumors, cysts, or inflammation during the study period.

2.4. Eligibility criteria

2.4.1. Inclusion criteria: All patients with salivary gland swellings who had both FNAC and histopathology results during the study period.

2.4.2. Exclusion criteria: Patients without FNAC or histopathology results were excluded from the study.    Patients with acute infections (viral or bacterial causes) were also excluded from the study.

2.5. Sample size determination

The sample size was calculated using a single population proportion formula, based on a 7% prevalence of salivary gland swellings from a prior study conducted at Addis Ababa University. The formula used was:


                                         

n = the required sample size

p = proportion of patients who have salivary gland swelling.

Zα\2 = the critical value at 95% confidence level = 1.96

e = precision (margin of error) = 5%

Accordingly,


                                     

Adding a non-response rate of 10% the final sample size will be 110.

2.6. Sampling procedure

A non-probability convenience sampling method was used to select patients from the study population.

2.7. Study variables

Benign salivary tumors: Pleomorphic adenoma, Warthin’s tumor, Basal cell adenoma, Myoepithelioma, Hemangioma, Lymphoepithelial lesions.

Malignant salivary tumors: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma, Adenoid cystic carcinoma, Adenocarcinoma, Ex-pleomorphic carcinoma, Acinar cell carcinoma, Myoepithelial carcinoma, Basal cell carcinoma, Papillary cystadenocarcinoma.

Non-neoplastic salivary tumors: Chronic sialadenitis, Vascular lesion, Unspecified cyst, Mucocele.

2.7.2. Independent variables:

Sociodemographic variables: Age, sex, side of swelling (left, right, bilateral), duration of swelling, and affected gland (parotid, submandibular, sublingual, minor salivary gland).

2.8. Operational definitions

Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC): A diagnostic procedure where a thin needle is inserted into a salivary gland mass to aspirate cells, which are then examined microscopically.

Histopathology: The study of tissues for diagnosing diseases, involving microscopic examination of tissue biopsies, which serves as the gold standard diagnostic method.

Benign tumors: Tumors that resemble the tissue of origin, lack invasion, and exhibit mild growth with normal mitotic figures.

Malignant tumors: Tumors that are poorly differentiated, show a high mitotic rate, and have invasive and metastatic potential.

Chronic sialadenitis: Chronic inflammation of the salivary glands characterized by macrophages, monocytes, lymphocytes, and proliferating blood vessels and connective tissue.

      Mucocele: A cystic swelling caused by disruption of normal salivary secretion flow.

2.9. Data collection procedures and tools

The data were collected through a review of patient medical records, using well-standardized and pre-tested questionnaires. The data collection was conducted by trained ORL HNS residents.

2.9.1. Data quality assurance: To ensure the accuracy of the data, a well-trained data collector and supervisor were assigned to monitor data collection. All collected data were reviewed and checked daily for completeness.

2.10. Data analysis procedure

The collected data were verified for completeness before entering the analysis phase. Incomplete or erroneous data were cleaned and removed. The final dataset was entered into SPSS version 27 for analysis. Descriptive statistics, including tables, charts, and graphs, were used to present the socio-demographic characteristics of the study population. The diagnostic accuracy of FNAC was assessed by calculating its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy in comparison to histopathology.

2.11. Dissemination of results

Upon completion of the study, the results will be submitted to the relevant departments at Saint Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, including the ORL HNS, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, and Pathology Departments. Additionally, the findings will be prepared for publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at relevant scientific conferences to ensure broader dissemination of the results.


3. Results

3.1. Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants

A total of 110 patients were included in the study, with 60 females (54.5%) and 50 males (45.5%). The female-to-male ratio was approximately 1.2:1. The mean age of the participants was 37.5 ± 16.9 years, with an age range of 12 to 79 years (Table 1).

Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of patients with salivary gland swelling and operated at SPHMMC, Addis Ababa Ethiopia, 2022.

Variables

Frequency (%)

Age Group

20-Nov

16(14.5)

21-29

24(21.8)

31-39

24(21.8)

41-49

18(16.4)

51-59

17(15.5)

61-69

8(7.3)

71-79

3(2.7)

Gender

Male

50(45.5)

Female

60(54.5)


The average duration of salivary gland swelling was 2.95 years, with a minimum duration of 5 months and a maximum of 15 years. Regarding the laterality of the swelling, 60 (54.5%) of the cases presented with left-sided swelling, while 50 (45.5%) presented with right-sided swelling.

Regarding the distribution of salivary gland swellings, the parotid gland was most frequently involved (46.4%), followed by the submandibular gland (42.7%), minor salivary glands (10.9%), and the sublingual gland (0%) (Table 2, Figure 1).

Table 2: Site of salivary gland swelling with histopathology results at SPHMMC, Addis Ababa Ethiopia, 2022.

Site of swelling

Frequency (%)

Minor salivary gland

12(10.9)

Parotid

51(46.4)

Submandibular

47(42.7)

Total

110


Figure 1: Site of salivary gland swelling with histopathology results at SPHMMC, Addis Ababa Ethiopia, 2022.


Among the parotid gland swellings, 54.9% were benign lesions, with pleomorphic adenoma (43.1%) being the most prevalent benign lesion. Non-neoplastic lesions, primarily chronic sialadenitis, accounted for 46.8% of submandibular swellings. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma was the most frequent malignant histopathological finding in the parotid, submandibular, and minor salivary glands (Figures 2,3 and 4).


Figure 2: Site of salivary gland swelling with histopathology malignant result at SPHMMC, Addis Ababa Ethiopia, 2022.


 Figure 3: Site of salivary gland swelling with histopathology benign result at SPHMMC, Addis Ababa Ethiopia, 2022.


Figure 4: Site of salivary gland swelling with histopathology non neoplastic result at SPHMMC, Addis Ababa Ethiopia, 2022.


3.2. FNAC results

FNAC results revealed that 27 cases (24.5%) were diagnosed as malignant, 58 cases (52.7%) as benign tumors, and 25 cases (22.7%) as non-neoplastic lesions. Pleomorphic adenoma was the most common benign tumor, accounting for 52 cases (89.65%), followed by lymphoepithelial lesions (3 cases, 5.1%), basal adenoma (2 cases, 3.4%), and hemangioma (1 case, 1.7%).

Among the malignant tumors diagnosed by FNAC, mucoepidermoid carcinoma was the most frequently observed, accounting for 14 cases (51.85%). Other malignant tumors included adenoid cystic carcinoma (4 cases, 14.81%), undifferentiated carcinoma (2 cases, 7.4%), ex-pleomorphic adenocarcinoma (2 cases, 7.4%), acinic cell carcinoma (2 cases, 7.4%), carcinosarcoma (1 case, 3.7%), ductal carcinoma (1 case, 3.7%), and adenocarcinoma (1 case, 3.7%).

Among the non-neoplastic lesions, chronic sialadenitis was the most common (21 cases, 84%), followed by unspecified cyst lesions (3 cases, 12%) and mucocele (1 case, 4%) (Table 3).

Table 3: FNAC result and its cytology subtype of lesion of salivary gland swelling at SPHMMC, Addis Ababa Ethiopia, 2022.

Variables

Frequency(%)

FNAC result

Benign

58(52.7)

Malignant

27(24.5)

Non neoplastic

25(22.7)

Total

110

Sub type of Benign lesion

Basal adenoma

2(34.4)

Hemangioma

1(1.72)

Lymphoepithelial lesion

3(5.1)

Pleomorphic adenoma

52(89.65)

Total

58

Sub type of Malignant lesion

Acinic cell carcinoma

2(7.4)

Adenocarcinoma

1(3.7)

Adenoid cystic carcinoma

4(14.8)

Carcinosarcoma

1(3.7)

Ductal carcinoma

1(3.7)

Ex pleomorphic adenoma

2(7.4)

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma

14(51.85)

Undifferentiated carcinoma

2(7.4)

Total

27

Non neoplastic sub type

Chronic sialadenitis

21(84)

Mucocele

1(4)

Unspecified cystic lesion

3(12)

Total

25


3.3. Histopathology results

The final histopathologic diagnosis revealed 30 malignant tumors (27.3%), 56 benign tumors (50.9%), and 24 non-neoplastic lesions (21.8%).

The most common malignant tumor was mucoepidermoid carcinoma, observed in 17 cases (56.66%), followed by adenoid cystic carcinoma (3 cases, 10%), ductal carcinoma (2 cases, 6.66%), acinic cell carcinoma (2 cases, 6.66%), ex-pleomorphic adenocarcinoma (2 cases, 6.66%), myoepithelial carcinoma (2 cases, 6.66%), adenocarcinoma (1 case, 3.33%), and carcinosarcoma (1 case, 3.33%).

Among the benign lesions, pleomorphic adenoma was the most prevalent, seen in 48 cases (85.7%), followed by basal adenoma (4 cases, 7.1%), lymphoepithelial lesions (3 cases, 5.3%), and hemangioma (1 case, 1.7%).

Chronic sialadenitis was the most common non-neoplastic lesion, accounting for 20 cases (83.3%), followed by unspecified cyst lesions (3 cases, 8.33%) and mucocele (1 case, 4.16%) (Table 4).

Table 4: Histopathology result and its subtype of lesion of salivary gland swelling and operated at SPHMMC, Addis Ababa Ethiopia, 2022.

Variables

Frequency(%)

 Histopathology result

Benign

56(50.9)

Malignant

30(27.3)

Non neoplastic

24(21.8)

Total

110

Malignant subtype

Acinic cell carcinoma

2(6.66)

Adenocarcinoma

1(3.33)

Adenoid cystic carcinoma

3(10)

Carcinosarcoma

1(3.33)

Ductal carcinoma

2(6.66)

Ex pleomorphic adenoma

2(6.66)

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma

17(56.66)

Undifferentiated carcinoma

2(6.66)

Total

30

Benign subtype

Basal adenoma

4(7.1)

Hemangioma

1(1.7)

Lymphoepithelial lesion

3(5.3)

Pleomorphic adenoma

48(85.7)

Total

56

Non neoplastic subtype

Chronic sialadenitis

20(83.33)

Mucocele

1(4.16)

Unspecified cystic lesion

39(12.5)

Total

24


3.4. Discordant results between FNAC and histopathology

Discordant results were observed in 16 cases, where the FNAC diagnosis did not match the histopathology findings. Specific discordances included:

One case of carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma, which was diagnosed as pleomorphic adenoma by FNAC.

Three cases diagnosed as mucoepidermoid carcinoma on histopathology were diagnosed as pleomorphic adenoma by FNAC.

One case of acinic cell carcinoma was misdiagnosed as ductal cell carcinoma by FNAC.

Two cases of ductal cell carcinoma were diagnosed as undifferentiated carcinoma and acinic cell carcinoma by FNAC.

Two cases of myoepithelial carcinoma were diagnosed as mucoepidermoid carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma by FNAC.

Two cases of basal adenoma were diagnosed as pleomorphic adenoma by FNAC.

Two cases of pleomorphic adenomas were diagnosed as mucoepidermoid carcinoma by FNAC.

Three cases of mucoepidermoid carcinoma were diagnosed as chronic sialadenitis, ex-pleomorphic adenoma, and undifferentiated carcinoma by FNAC (Table 5).


Table 5: Cases with discordant in cyto histopathological diagnosis, SPHMMC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia,2022.

Cytology diagnosis

Histopathology diagnosis

Pleomorphic adenoma

Basal adenoma

Pleomorphic adenoma

Basal adenoma

Pleomorphic adenoma

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma

Pleomorphic adenoma

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma

Pleomorphic adenoma

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma

Pleomorphic adenoma

Ex pleomorphic adenoma

Chronic sialadenitis

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma

Ductal carcinoma

Acinic cell carcinoma

Ex pleomorphic adenoma

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma

Myoepithelial carcinoma

Acinic cell carcinoma

Ductal carcinoma

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma

Pleomorphic adenoma

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma

Pleomorphic adenoma

Undifferentiated carcinoma

Ductal carcinoma

Undifferentiated carcinoma

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma

Acinic cell carcinoma

Myoepithelial carcinoma


3.5. Diagnostic accuracy assessment

The diagnostic accuracy of FNAC was evaluated by calculating its sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), and overall accuracy for each category of salivary gland pathology.

                 ·       Benign cases:

o   Sensitivity: 96.42%

o   Specificity: 92.6%

o   Positive Predictive Value (PPV): 93.1%

o   Negative Predictive Value (NPV): 96.1%

o   Accuracy: 94.54%

·       Malignant cases:

o   Sensitivity: 83.3%

o   Specificity: 95.5%

o   PPV: 92.6%

o   NPV: 93.97%

o   Accuracy: 93.63%

·       Non-neoplastic cases:

o   Sensitivity: 100%

o   Specificity: 98.83%

o   PPV: 96%

o   NPV: 100%

o   Accuracy: 99.09%


Table 6: Cross tabs between FNAC and histopathology result of salivary gland swelling and operated at SPHMMC, Addis Ababa Ethiopia, 2022.

Biopsy benign

FNAC benign

No

Yes

Total

No

50

2

52

Yes

4

54

58

Total

54

56

110

Biopsy malignant

FNAC malignant

No

Yes

Total

No

78

5

83

Yes

2

25

27

Total

80

30

110

Biopsy non neoplastic

FNAC non-neoplastic

No

Yes

Total

No

85

0

85

Yes

1

24

25

Total

86

24

110


Table 7: Parameters of validity measurement for non-neoplastic, benign and malignant FNAC result of salivary gland swelling in comparison with histopathology result, SPHMMC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2022.

Parameters of validity

Value (%)

Non-neoplastic

Benign

Malignant

Sensitivity

100%

96.42%

83.30%

Specificity

98.83%

92.60%

95.50%

Positive predictive value

96%

93.10%

92.60%

Negative predictive value

100%

96.10%

93.97%

Accuracy

99.09%

94.51%

93.63%


4. Discussion

Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) is a widely used diagnostic technique for evaluating salivary gland enlargement, offering a simple, rapid, and safe procedure. FNAC is known for its high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, with sensitivity ranging from 86% to 100% and specificity from 90% to 100% in diagnosing salivary gland lesions1,2,8. The accuracy of FNAC is significantly influenced by the experience of both the pathologist and the clinician performing the aspiration1. FNAC plays a crucial role in treatment planning, helping to avoid unnecessary surgeries and reducing hospital costs9.

In our study, patients ranged in age from 12 to 79 years, with a mean age of 37.5 years, and a male-to-female ratio of 1:1. Previous studies in Nepal reported a similar age range, with a median of 38 years7. Research from Liaquat National Hospital indicated an average age of 42 years (±21), with a male-to-female ratio of 1:1, while another study reported a mean age of 35.7 years (±19.3 years) and a male-to-female ratio of 1.2:1. Additionally, research in Tanzania indicated a peak age range between 20 and 49 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.5:17,11-14.

Regarding the distribution of salivary gland swellings, our study found that 46.4% of swellings were in the parotid gland, 42.7% in the submandibular gland, 10.9% in the minor salivary glands, and 0% in the sublingual gland. Other studies have reported comparable findings, with one study showing 68% parotid gland involvement, 30% submandibular, 2% minor salivary gland, and 0% sublingual involvement14,16. Another study indicated 48.3% parotid, 41.2% submandibular, and 10.4% minor salivary gland involvement, again with no sublingual gland involvement.

In terms of the final pathological diagnosis, our study identified 30 malignant tumors (27.3%), 56 benign tumors (50.9%), and 24 non-neoplastic lesions (21.8%). A comparable study found that non-neoplastic lesions made up 53.22% (66/124) of all cases, followed by benign tumors (31.45%, 39/124) and malignant tumors (15.32%)16. Another study also found similar proportions, with 27.3% malignant tumors, 50.9% benign tumors, and 21.8% non-neoplastic lesions15.

The most frequent pathological findings in our study included pleomorphic adenoma (benign), mucoepidermoid carcinoma (malignant), and chronic sialadenitis (non-neoplastic). These findings are consistent with other studies, where chronic sialadenitis was the most common non-neoplastic lesion, pleomorphic adenoma was the most common benign lesion, and adenoid cystic carcinoma was the most frequent malignant lesion7,11,13,17-19. In one study, non-Hodgkin lymphoma was the most prevalent malignant lesion, while pleomorphic adenoma was again the most common benign lesion. Another study found pleomorphic adenoma to be the most common tumor (44.4%), followed by adenoid cystic carcinoma (24.8%) and mucoepidermoid carcinoma (9.8%). Pleomorphic adenoma also emerged as the most common neoplasm (63%) in a separate investigation, with Warthin's tumor accounting for 17.5%.

The parotid gland was the most frequent site of swelling in our study, consistent with the findings from Addis Ababa University, where sialadenitis affected 29.8% of patients, with the submandibular gland being the most commonly affected site20. In our study, pleomorphic adenoma was the most common lesion in the parotid and minor salivary glands, while chronic sialadenitis was most frequently found in the submandibular gland.

Our diagnostic performance analysis revealed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for non-neoplastic lesions were 100%, 98.83%, and 99.09%, respectively; for benign neoplasms, they were 96.42%, 92.6%, and 94.54%; and for malignant neoplasms, they were 83.3%, 95.5%, and 94.54% (Tables 5-7). In comparison, other studies have reported varying values. One study found the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to be 100%, 89.28%, and 91.67% for non-neoplastic lesions; 100%, 86.95%, and 91.67% for benign neoplasms; and 57.14%, 100%, and 83.33% for malignant neoplasms. Another study reported a 100% sensitivity, 95.8% specificity, and 93% accuracy for non-neoplastic lesions, with 98.78% accuracy for benign lesions and 77.77% for malignant lesions7,13,14,16.

The Positive Predictive Values and Negative Predictive Values (PPV and NPV) in our study were 93.1% and 96.1% for benign lesions, 92.6% and 93.97% for malignant lesions, and 96% and 100% for non-neoplastic lesions. One study reported PPV and NPV for benign and malignant tumors as 94.36% and 96.55%, respectively, with 93.33% PPV and 95.29% NPV for malignant tumors. Another study found FNAC to have a 97% negative predictive value (NPV), with a PPV of 92.3% and NPV of 93.6%6,14,18.


5. Strengths and Limitations

The main strength of this study is its contribution to understanding the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC for salivary gland swellings. Given that incisional biopsy is not recommended for these conditions, FNAC plays a pivotal role in influencing the surgical approach, providing a reliable foundation for treatment planning. Our findings underscore the usefulness of FNAC in guiding surgical decisions, thereby reducing unnecessary procedures and minimizing hospital costs.

However, the study has some limitations:

Lack of immunohistochemistry: We did not utilize Immunohistochemistry (IHC), which could have provided further insights into the various histologic categories and their precise classifications.

Retrospective data: Since the study was based on retrospectively collected data, the validity measurements might be either overestimated or underestimated.

Reliability issues: Due to the retrospective nature of the data, it is difficult to perform reliability testing and to fully assess the causes of false positive and false negative FNAC results.


6. Conclusion

FNAC is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tool for salivary gland swellings. It is particularly useful for distinguishing benign from malignant lesions and guiding surgical management.


7. Recommendations

For healthcare professionals: FNAC should be routinely used for preoperative evaluation of salivary gland swellings to avoid unnecessary surgeries.

For policymakers: Establish pathology laboratories in all healthcare institutions to improve access to FNAC services.

For researchers: Conduct multicenter studies with larger sample sizes to further validate the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC.

8. Declarations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Review Board of Saint Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College. Written consent was obtained from patients or their guardians before participation. The confidentiality of patient data was strictly maintained throughout the study.  Consent for publication was obtained from the patient and is available upon request from the corresponding author.

9. Authors' contributions

   Dr. Mohammed Sefa Arusi and Dr. Zelalem Tadesse Wondimu

Ø  Substantial contributions to conception and study design;

Ø  drafting the article and the manuscript 

Ø  final approval of the version to be published.

    Dr. Zeyneb Saleh

Ø  acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data;

Ø  revising it critically for important intellectual content;

Ø  final approval of the version to be published.


10. Acknowledgment: The authors thank St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College for supporting this study.


11. References

  1. Singh A, Haritwal A, Murali BM. Correlation between cytology and histopathology of the salivary gland. Australas Med J. 2011;4: 66-71.
  2. Koirala S, Sayami G, Pant AD. Correlation of FNAC and histopathology in diagnosis of salivary gland lesions. J Pathology of Nepal. 2014;4: 654-657.
  3. To VSH, Chan JYW, Tsang RKY, Wei WI. Review of Salivary Gland Neoplasms. ISRN Otolaryngol. 2012;2012: 1-6.
  4. Licitra L, Grandi C, Prott FJ, et al. Major and minor salivary gland tumours. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;45: 215-25.
  5. Sneige N, Batsakis JG, El-Naggar AK. Pathology consultation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1992;101: 877-880.
  6. Huq AHMZ, Asa A. A comparative study between fine needle aspiration cytology findings and histopathological report of major salivary gland neoplasm in a tertiary hospital of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2013;39: 1-6.
  7. Gupta R, Dewan D, Kumar D, Suri J. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of salivary gland lesions with histopathological correlation in a district hospital of Jammu region. Indian J Pathol Oncol. 2016;3(1): 32-36.
  8. Pantanowitz L, Thompson LDR, Rossi ED. Diagnostic approach to fine needle aspirations of cystic lesions of the salivary gland. Head Neck Pathol. 2018;12(4): 548-561.
  9. Das DK, Petkar MA, Al-Mane NM, Sheikh ZA, Mallik MK, Anim JT. Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of swellings in the salivary gland regions: A study of 712 cases. Med Princ Pract. 2004;13: 95-106.
  10. Zurrida S, Alasio L, Tradafi N, Bartoli C, Chiesa F, Pilotti S. Fine-needle aspiration of parotid masses. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17: 301-306.
  11. Masanja MI, Kalyanyama BM, Simon EN. Salivary gland tumors in Tanzania. East Afr Med J. 2003;80: 429-433.
  12. Aidya S. Correlation of FNAC and histopathology in salivary gland lesions. J Pathology of Nepal. 2011;1.
  13. Naz S, Hashmi AA, Khurshid A, et al. Diagnostic role of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the evaluation of salivary gland swelling: An institutional experience. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8: 1-7.
  14. Ashraf A, Shaikh AS, Kamal F, Sarfraz R, Bukhari MH. Diagnostic reliability of FNAC for salivary gland swellings: A comparative study. Diagn Cytopathol. 2010;38: 499-504.
  15. Nazir RT, Sharif MA, Iqbal M, Amin MS. Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in hepatic tumors. J Coll Physicians Surg Pakistan. 2010;20: 373-376.
  16. Omhare A, Singh SK, Nigam JS, Sharma A. Cytohistopathological study of salivary gland lesions in Bundelkhand Region, Uttar Pradesh, India. Pathol Res Int. 2014;2014: 1-7.
  17. Liu CC, Jethwa AR, Khariwala SS, Johnson J, Shin JJ. Sensitivity, specificity, and posttest probability of parotid fine-needle aspiration: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;154: 9-23.
  18. Gudmundsson JK, Ajan A, Abtahi J. The accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology for diagnosis of parotid gland masses: A clinicopathological study of 114 patients. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016;24: 561-567.
  19. Poudel A, Shrestha B, Regmi S. Evaluation of salivary gland lesions by fine needle aspiration cytology at a tertiary care hospital, Western Nepal. Pathol Lab Med Int. 2020;12: 9-17.
  20. Beyene M. Prevalence and patterns of salivary gland disease in maxillofacial surgery, affiliated hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Addis Ababa University. 2022. 

 Annex I   

1.        Data Collection Format

St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College

The Purpose of this study is to compare and assess sensitivity and specificity of FNAC and histopathology reports of salivary gland swellings at Saint Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College.

I kindly request your willingness to perform these reviews. The information gathered will be used confidentially.

Code

Question

Response

Remark

 

 

 

Part one: Socio-demographic factors

 

SD1

MRN (code)

 

____________

 

 

SD2

Age

 

____________

 

 

SD3

Sex

Male

 

 

Female

 

 

Part two: Clinical characteristics

 

CC1

Site of swollen gland

 

 

Parotid

 

 

submandibular

 

sublingual

 

Minor salivary gland

 

 

CC2

Side of swelling

Right

 

 

Left

 

CC3

Duration of swelling

 

 

Part three:  Cytopathology pathology (FNAC) findings

 

 

CP1

FNAC

 

Benign

 

 

Malignant

 

Non neoplastic

 

CP2

Benign subtypes

Pleomorphic adenoma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warthin tumor

 

Basal cell adenoma

 

adenoma

 

hemangioma

 

 

 

CP3

Malignant subtypes

 

 

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma

 

 

Adenoid cystic carcinoma

 

Squamous cell carcinoma

 

Ex pleomorphic carcinoma

 

adenocarcinoma

 

Basal cell carcinoma

 

Acinar cell carcinoma

 

Ductal carcinoma

 

CP4

Non neoplastic

 

mucocele

 

 

Chronic sialadenitis

 

Congenital vascular anomalies

 

Cystic lesion

 

 

Part four: Histopathology findings

 

HP1

Histopathology result

benign

 

 

malignant

 

Non neoplastic

 

HP2

Benign

Pleomorphic adenoma

 

 

Warthin tumor

 

Basal cell adenoma

 

Adenoma

 

hemangioma

 

 

HP3

Malignant subtypes

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma

 

 

Adenoid cystic carcinoma

 

Squamous cell carcinoma

 

 

Ex pleomorphic carcinoma

 

adenocarcinoma

 

Basal cell carcinoma

 

Acinar cell carcinoma

 

Ductal carcinoma

 

HP4

Non neoplastic

mucocele

 

 

Chronic sialadenitis

 

Congenital vascular anomalies

 

Cystic lesion