Abstract
Background: Olfactory
impairment is one of the frequently reported clinical signs of Covid-19
illness, which is thought to influence multiple systems.
Aim: To
evaluate the prevalence of smell disturbance among covid-19 patients.
Materials and Methods: A
cross-sectional study was conducted on covid-19 cases among the students in the
medical field in Holey Karbala City. The data was collected using an online survey
questionnaire, which include general demographic information, medical history, COVID-infection-related
questions (exposure, duration, symptoms), and smell alteration.
Results: Total
number of cases 282, the prevalence of smell change 79% affecting mainly
females (57.7%). The most frequently reported type of smell disturbance was
anosmia (47.5%). Most cases of olfactory impairment reported mild to moderate
clinical course (32.6% and 34.4%, respectively) with a recovery period of more
than 1 week and less than 3 months. The most frequently associated symptoms
were fever and cough.
Conclusion: Smell
disturbance was highly prevalent among the young, female population and mostly
associated with mild clinical course.
Keywords:
COVID-19, Smell disorder, Anosmia
1.
Introduction
The
World Health Organization (WHO) declared the coronavirus disease 2019
(COVID-19), caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-Cov-2),
a pandemic three months after it was first discovered in Wuhan, China1,2. From that point on, the disease spread
rapidly throughout the world as a pandemic, with more than 550 million
confirmed cases and more than 6 million fatalities reported until July 20221-3.
The
glycoprotein surface molecule that the COVID-19 virus used to express its effects
uses a spike that it is known to produce when it binds with Angiotensin-Converting
Enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors. Alveolar cells in the lung are where ACE2 is mostly
secreted. As a result, the lung is thought to be the human body's organ that is
most adversely affected. However, many additional glandular, endothelial, and
enterocyte cells also express ACE2, making them vulnerable to covid-19
infection4.
About
80% of Covid-19 cases are mild and self-limited, mostly affecting the upper
airway with minimal lung involvement5.
About 80% of Covid-19 cases are mild and self-limited, mostly affecting the
upper airway with minimal lung involvement5.
Covid-19 is characterized by a variety of clinical manifestations. A high fever
typically emerges after a dry cough; occasionally, viral pneumonia develops and
worsens, leading to breathlessness. Fever, dry cough, dyspnea, muscle ache
(myalgia), confusion, headache, sore throat, rhinorrhea, chest pain, diarrhea,
nausea/vomiting, conjunctival congestion, nasal congestion, sputum production,
fatigue (malaise), hemoptysis, and chills are among the symptoms that COVID-19
patients frequently experience6,7.
The WHO and many other health authorities have
recognized the loss of smell or taste as a new symptom of COVID-19 infection as
a result of an increasing number of articles and studies that demonstrate
anosmia as a screening symptom and diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV2. A significant
proportion of test-positive COVID19 patients experience a new onset of smell or
taste disturbance8.
In the course of normal olfactory physiology, a
volatile substance interacts with the chemoreceptors present on the olfactory
sensory neurons to produce the sensation of smell. At the apex of the nasal
canal, the olfactory sensory neurons are surrounded by supportive cells such as
stem cells, Bowman's glands that secrete mucus, sustentacular cells, and
microvillar cells9. The action
potential is sent from the activated olfactory sensory neurons to the olfactory
bulb and then to the amygdala, hippocampus, and primary olfactory cortex.
Olfactory abnormalities that may be conductive due to excessive mucus
production and respiratory epithelium congestion or sensorineural due to
neurological damage may emerge from changes at any step in this route10.
The pathophysiology of anosmia and other small changes
in covid-19 has not been determined5.
However, it may be due to the malfunctioning of olfactory sensory neurons
brought on by direct neuronal infection or by infection and death of supporting
cells, microvillar cells, and vascular pericytes. But there may also be
additional inflammation-related processes, such as localized mucosal edema and
airflow obstruction (Figure 1)5,11.
There are two forms of smell disorders: quantitative (anosmia and hyposmia) and qualitative (parosmia and cacosmia), each with a unique recovery process and outcome12.
Figure 1: Possible smell difficulty pathophysiology in COVID-19. In COVID-19, olfactory disorders may be caused by: 1) infection and damage to the olfactory epithelium's supporting cells, which results in inflammation and changes to the local homeostasis; or 2) infection- or immune-mediated damage to the endothelial cells and vascular pericytes, which causes hypoperfusion and inflammation. In both situations, the activation of inflammatory cells, the release of cytokines, and the production of neurotoxic substances may indirectly affect neural signaling. Additionally, blockage of the olfactory cleft and potential direct neuronal cell infection could happen5.
2.
Materials and Methods
2.1.
Study Design and Sampling Method
This
cross-sectional study was conducted among covid-19 cases of the students in the
medical field in Holey Karbala, during September and October 2021. The data was
collected by an online questionnaire; a Google form link was posted on social
network programs (Telegram and WhatsApp) and both male and female students who
were infected with the coronavirus were asked to enroll and fill out the questionnaire
from various stages. Subjects with incomplete data were excluded from the study.
2.2. Data Collection and Management
The
information was obtained through a web-based questionnaire that had 13
questions in 3 categories. 1) Personal information, such as gender and age. 2)
Inquiries on smell disturbance (onset, nature, duration, relationship to corona
infection progression, and other symptoms). 3) The danger factors and the
severity of the infection. The questionnaire's items were created following
scientific research, existing questionnaires, and information available from
open sources.
2.3. Data Analysis
Microsoft Excel was used to enter the data, and IBM's Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS), US version 26 was used to analyze it. With an explanation paragraph for each, descriptive statistics and outcomes were displayed as tables with numbers, and percentages.
3.
Results
Students that participated in the survey varied in age from 18 to 24,
with a mean and SD of 20.36 and 1.820. There were 57.7% of women. 79.4% of
covid-19 patients overall experienced smell disturbance, whereas 21% had no
change in smell. 20.6% of COVID-19 students reported no change in smell, 47.5%
had a total loss of smell (anosmia), 14.2% had a reduction in smell (hyposmia),
and 14.9% and 2.8%, respectively, had smell disturbances caused by cacosmia and
parosmia. Anosmia began gradually in 93/282 (38.39%) whereas suddenly in
149/282 (61.61%) of cases.
According to the
duration of the smell disturbance, the cases were separated into three groups:
short, lasting up to one week, intermediate, lasting between one week and three
months, and long, lasting longer than three months.
Cases were divided
into four groups based on when the smell disturbance first appeared: (1) Before
the onset of general symptoms (8.1%), (2) While experiencing general symptoms
(36.6%), (3) Following the cessation of general symptoms (43.8%), and (4) As
the only symptom (11.6%).
Only 26 out of the 282 students smoked. Taste loss was reported by 47.5% of COVID-19 patients in total (Table 1).
Table 1: Descriptive demographic features of the study participants (N=282).
|
Variables |
Descriptive statistics |
|
|
Age Mean (SD) |
N = 282 |
20.4 (1.8) |
|
Female sex |
N = 209 |
57.7% |
|
Smell disturbance |
||
|
No |
N = 58 |
20.6% |
|
Yes |
N = 224 |
79.4% |
|
Anosmia |
N = 134 |
47.5% |
|
Cacosmia |
N = 42 |
14.9% |
|
Hyposmia |
N = 40 |
14.2% |
|
Parosmia |
N = 8 |
2.8% |
|
Onset of anosmia |
||
|
Gradual |
N = 8 |
38.39% |
|
Sudden |
N = 8 |
61.61% |
|
Severity of anosmia |
||
|
Mild |
N = 92 |
(32.6%) |
|
Moderate |
N = 97 |
(34.3%) |
|
Severe |
N = 31 |
(10.9%) |
|
Critical |
N = 4 |
(1.4%) |
|
Duration of anosmia |
||
|
Short |
N = 68 |
(24.2%) |
|
Intermediate |
N = 156 |
(55.2%) |
|
Long |
N = 58 |
(20.6%) |
|
Starting time of anosmia |
||
|
Before general symptoms |
(8.1%) |
|
|
With general symptoms |
(36.6%) |
|
|
After general symptoms |
(43.8%) |
|
|
The only symptom |
(11.6%) |
|
|
Smoking |
N = 26 |
(9.2%) |
|
Taste loss |
N = 134 |
(47.5%) |
Women made up 57.7% of patients who experienced smell changes, while men made up 21.6%. Female patients made up 16% of those patients who had no smell change, whereas male patients made up 4.6% (Table 2).
Table
2: Gender
and prevalence of smell disturbance.
|
Gender |
Smell Disturbance |
Total |
|||
|
Yes |
No |
||||
|
Male |
61 |
21.60% |
13 |
4.60% |
74 (26.2%) |
|
Female |
163 |
57.70% |
45 |
16% |
208 (73.8%) |
|
Total |
224 |
79.40% |
58 |
20.56% |
282 |
In terms of the severity of the presentation, 35 (12.3%) had a severe anosmia, 121 (42.8%) had a moderate anosmia, and 5 (1.8%) had a critical anosmia. According to the frequency of smell disturbance, 32.6% of all cases had a mild disease, 34.3% had a moderate disease, 10.9% had a severe disease, and only 1.4% had a critical condition that required hospitalization (Table 3).
Table 3: Severity of smell disturbance.
|
Smell Disturbance |
Severity |
Total |
|||
|
Mild |
Moderate |
Severe |
Critical |
||
|
No |
29 (10.2%) |
24 (8.5%) |
4 (1.4%) |
1 (0.4%) |
58 (20.6%) |
|
Yes |
92 (32.6%) |
97 (34.3%) |
31 (10.9%) |
4 (1.4%) |
224 (79.4%) |
|
Total |
121 (42.8%) |
121 (42.8%) |
35 (12.3%) |
5 (1.8%) |
282 (100%) |
There were 26 smokers out of the total 282 cases, 19 (73.08%) of whom report smell disturbances whereas 7 (26.92%) did not experience smell alteration. 51 (20%) of the remaining nonsmokers did not experience smell change, while 205 (80%) of them experienced smell disruption (Table 4).
Table 4: Smell disturbance with smoking
|
Smoking |
Smell Disturbance |
Total |
|
|
No smell
change |
Smell
change |
||
|
No |
51 (20%) |
205 (80%) |
256 |
|
Yes |
7 (26.92%) |
19 (73.08%) |
26 |
|
Total |
58 (20.56%) |
224 (79.4%) |
282 (100%) |
A total of 224 out of the 282 cases had smell disturbances during the illness, of which 120 (42.5%) had both smell and taste changes, 104 (36.8%) only had smell changes without taste changes, 14 (4.9%) had taste changes without smell changes, and 44 (15.6%) had neither, as shown in (Table 5).
Table 5: Relation of smell disturbance with loss or decrease taste.
|
Total |
|||
|
No
smell change |
Smell
change |
||
|
No |
44 (15.6%) |
104 (36.8%) |
148 |
|
Yes |
14 (4.9%) |
120 (42.5%) |
134 |
|
Total |
58 (20.56%) |
224 (79.4%) |
282 (100%) |
In total, 282 cases resulted in 224 cases of smell disturbance, of which 163 (73%) also experienced respiratory symptoms and 60 (27%) didn't. Coughing, sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal blockage, congestion, and SOB are examples of respiratory symptoms. 210 (94%) of the 224 individuals with smell disturbance also had general symptoms, while 14 (6%) did not. (Fever, headache, malaise, weariness, decreased appetite, nausea) are examples of general symptoms. Only 56 (25%) of the 224 individuals with smell disturbance also experienced GIT symptoms (diarrhea and stomach discomfort), while 168 (75%) did not (Table 6).
Table 6: Relation between smell change and other symptoms.
|
Other Symptoms |
Smell Disturbance |
Total |
||
|
Smell change |
No smell change |
|||
|
Respiratory symptoms |
No |
61 (27%) |
13 (22%) |
73 |
|
Yes |
163 (73%) |
45 (78%) |
208 |
|
|
General |
No |
14 (6%) |
4 (7%) |
18 |
|
Yes |
210 (94%) |
54 (93%) |
264 |
|
|
GIT symptoms |
No |
168 (75%) |
41(71%) |
209 |
|
Yes |
56 (25%) |
17 (29%) |
73 |
|
4. Discussion
In
the city of Holey Karbala, this cross-sectional study was undertaken among
covid-19 cases of medical students. 79% of covid-19 patients reported having a
smell disruption overall, with females accounting for the majority of cases
(57.7%), whereas the remaining 21% reported having no change in smell while
unwell.
When compared to an Italian study, the results were
pertinent to us at 66%13 and
similar to those of Yan et al.14,
about a smaller sample of 59 positive patients; the prevalence is (68 %).
While in a study conducted in Daegu, Korea, the prevalence was 15.3%, with
females affected predominately (68.9%), the results were significantly lower. However, a study conducted in France
in 2020 found that the prevalence of smell disturbance was 70%, with young
patients showing the disorder most frequently15.
This
may account for our increased prevalence since the study was conducted on a
young population (the study sample's age ranged from 18 to 24) and among
students studying medicine, the majority of whom were female.
Patients
with COVID-19 have either a quantitative (anosmia, which refers to a lack of
ability to smell, or a qualitative (cacosmia, parosmia), which refers to “wrong”
perception of odors) or qualitative (hyposmia, which refers to a diminished
ability to smell) kind of smell disturbance16.
There were varying percentages of affected participants in the current study,
with anosmia accounting for the majority (47.5%), whereas hyposmia (14.2%)
and/or other smell disturbances, such as cacosmia (14.95) and parosmia (2.8%),
were less common. Patients with smell disturbance reported hyposmia (51.6%) as
their main symptom, although anosmia (12.5%) and parosmia (17.2%) were also
common17.
Both studies demonstrate that patients are more
affected by quantitative loss than by qualitative defect, although the two
investigations demonstrate differing prevalences of smell change types.
Cases were divided into mild, moderate, severe, and
critical categories based on how serious they were when they were presented.
Critical cases required hospitalization. According to this study, smell
disruption predominantly affects moderate and mild cases-34.4% and 32.6%, respectively-while
only 10.9% of people who had smell alteration went on to get a severe sickness,
and 1.4% developed a critical illness.
A statistically significant correlation between the
olfactory and gustatory symptoms and the mildly symptomatic forms of the
condition, which are typically treated at home, was also demonstrated in the
study by Yan et al.14, which
is consistent with the findings of our investigation. Olfactory or gustatory
abnormalities were not linked to severe forms of Covid-19 that required
hospitalization. These deficits may therefore be a significant prognostic
factor for Covid-1915.
Based on the current study, smell disturbance
typically occurs along with or following the other symptoms. While in the study
conducted in Istanbul, Turkey, patients were more likely to report a smell
disturbance (53.1%) before the onset of general symptoms17. Our
findings, however, are consistent with a French study that found the median
time for the onset of olfactory deficits was 2 days following the onset of the
initial symptoms15.
For a better and quicker recovery, individuals with mild disease can be
identified and isolated based on the beginning of smell disruption and its
correlation with milder forms of sickness.
According to the length of the smell disturbance and recovery time, we
discovered that the majority of patients (55.16%) recovered within a time frame
of more than a week to less than three months, which is consistent with the
median recovery period of 15 days obtained in the Chary et al. study15.
The results of this study indicated that nonsmokers experienced higher
rates of smell alteration than smokers, however, this could have been an
accident or unreliable result given that the majority of the patients were
nonsmokers and female. In contrast, research conducted in Kirkuk, Iraq, found
that the majority of patients 72 (61.5%) smoked, and more than half of them 53
(45.3%) had hyposmia18.
One of the main symptoms associated with smell change is taste
impairment. Of the patients included, 42.5% reported both smell and taste
changes, whereas 36.8% reported smell impairment solely. This is consistent
with a French study that found cases of combined olfactory and gustatory
impairment to be more common than cases of only smell alterations15.
The most common
symptoms associated with smell impairment during the period of COVID-19 illness
were the general symptoms, which include fever, headache, fatigue, and myalgia
in 94% of the cases.
The
general symptoms, which in 94% of cases included fever, headache, weariness,
and myalgia, were the most prevalent linked to smell impairment during the COVID-19
illness.
The
73% of people reported respiratory symptoms, such as coughing, sneezing,
rhinorrhea, nasal blockage, congestion, and shortness of breath, whereas 25% of
people complained of GIT symptoms in connection with scent disruption. The
percentage of GIT complaints in the studies by Char15 was 17% and 17.2%,17 respectively.
5.
Conclusion
Smell disturbance was quite common in covid-19 patients, and it was more common in female patients and those with mild and intermediate clinical courses. Anosmia and hyposmia were the most common forms of quantitative smell abnormality in the patients. Patients who have experienced a change in smell typically describe nonspecific symptoms, such as fever, headache, and cough, which begin with or before the change in smell. Olfactory impairment requires an extended recovery period, and the majority of patients also report gustatory impairment.
6. References