Mini Abstract
The
management of pediatric peritoneal metastasis and the possible role of logo
regional treatment using cytoreductive surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal
Chemotherapy (HIPEC). A retrospective review of the last
two decades from the same peritoneal surface malignancy center.
Abstract
Objective: Pediatric
peritoneal metastasis.
Background: Peritoneal
malignancies in children are rare, but associated with poor outcome. The CRS
and HIPEC have been applied to pediatric population in recent years. The role
of this treatment remains controversial due to the rarity of the disease and
the limited of the cases.
Method: A
retrospective analysis from 2003 to 2023 identified 16 children with PM who
underwent CRS and HIPEC from our group.
Results: The
median age of the children was 14 year (range 8-16,4). The histological types
included Desmoid tumors (5), Wilms tumors (5), rhabdomyosarcoma (2) and other
(4). The median peritoneal cancer index was 10.2 (range 6-28). There is 1
postoperative death.
The median PCI 10.2 (range 6-28). The median operation
time was 6h (range 4-10). There is one postoperative death 1/16 (6.25%) due to
massive pulmonary embolism in a colon cancer patient.
All
patients routinely received a Levine tube (gastric tube) following CRS and
HIPEC, which was removed between the 4th and 8th postoperative day. No evidence of renal failure or other metabolic
complications.
The major complications according to the Clavien-Dindo
were 3/16 (18.8%).
Postoperatively patients received chemotherapy (n=13)
and radiotherapy (n=8) according to the different received molecular-targeted
therapy. From the 14 patients 8 relapsed after CRS + HIPEC, tree of them in
peritoneal cavity and five in Liver/or Lungs. The mean time of relapse disease
is 2 years after CRS plus HIPEC.
Conclusion:
CRS+HIPEC are safe and feasible in children with good
selection of the cases.
Keywords: Cytoreductive surgery; Pediatric peritoneal metastasis; Malignancy
1. Introduction
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal
Chemotherapy (HIPEC) is used to target microscopic peritoneal disease which can
remain after visible disease has been surgically removed, in patients with
peritoneal metastasis from different tumors which spread in the peritoneal
cavity.
Research in the pediatric
population is limited due to the small patient numbers and lack of clinical
experience1-3. Additionally,
inclusion criteria for pediatric cases were stringent and carefully defined. For young patients with aggressive,
peritoneal-disseminated tumors, HIPEC (Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal
Chemotherapy) combined with multimodal therapy may represent a promising
treatment strategy4,5.
In this study, we present
our 20 years experience with different
HIPEC types in pediatric patients, including reported survival outcomes,
treatment-related toxicities and complications.
2. Patients and Methods
We presented a retrospectively analysis of pediatric
peritoneal metastasis from soft tissue sarcomas, including Desmoplastic Small
Round Cell Tumors (DSRCT), Rhabdomyosarcomas (RMS), Wilms tumors, also
colorectal carcinomas and ovarian tumors.
During a 20 years period 2003-2023 16 cases are presented and treatment from the same surgeon (JS) in 4 different hospitals.
2.1. Inclusion Criteria
Age: ≤18
years at time of treatment
Performance status: Good functional status (e.g., ECOG ≤1 or
Lansky/Karnofsky score ≥80%).
Organ function: Normal
renal function and normal liver function (as defined by standard laboratory
thresholds).
Disease extent:
Locally advanced or metastatic disease confined to the abdominal cavity.
Treatment response: Documented response to prior chemotherapy. Ethical and scientific approval from the institutional tumor and ethics boards
The HIPEC regimens were as follow:
Doxorubicin + Cisplatin
Cisplatin
The administered doses were Doxorubicin 15 mg/m² and Cisplatin 50 mg/m². There are 4 HIPEC cannulas placed below the diaphragm and in the pelvic cavity and the procedure performed with closed abdomen for 60 min in 42.50C Table 1.
2.2. Statistical analysis
Time-to-event outcomes were estimated using
Kaplan-Meier curves. The log-rank test was used to assess the effect of the
predictors, respectively, on Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival
(OS). OS defined as the time from the surgery time to death (for any reason).
Disease-Free Survival (DFS) was defined as the interval from the date of
surgery to the first occurrence of disease recurrence or death from any cause.
Continuous variables are presented as median values and categorical variables as counts. All p values < 0.05 were considered to be statically significant. All analyses were conducted using SPSS version 26.0.3.0 (released 2019; IBM Corp.).
Table 1:
Presents the demographic date and location of its tumor.
|
No |
Gender |
Age |
Histology |
PCI |
CCs |
Hipec
drug |
Compl. |
|
1 |
F |
12 |
Other |
12 |
0 |
DDP |
0 |
|
2 |
F |
16 |
Other |
16 |
1 |
DDP |
2 |
|
3 |
M |
8 |
DSRCT |
6 |
0 |
DOX+DDP |
0 |
|
4 |
M |
14 |
Other |
10 |
0 |
DDP/mitomicin |
1 |
|
5 |
F |
14 |
RMS |
8 |
1 |
DOX |
1 |
|
6 |
M |
16 |
DSRCT |
10 |
1 |
DOX+DDP |
0 |
|
7 |
M |
16 |
RMS |
8 |
0 |
DOX |
0 |
|
8 |
F |
14 |
DSRCT |
13 |
1 |
DOX+DDP |
0 |
|
9 |
M |
12 |
Wilms |
8 |
0 |
DOX |
0 |
|
10 |
M |
10 |
Wilms |
14 |
2 |
DOX |
0 |
|
11 |
M |
16 |
DSRCT |
6 |
0 |
DOX+DDP |
0 |
|
12 |
F |
14 |
DSRCT |
10 |
1 |
DOX+DDP |
0 |
|
13 |
F |
10 |
Wilms |
10 |
0 |
DOX |
0 |
|
14 |
F |
15 |
Wilms |
8 |
0 |
DOX |
0 |
|
15 |
M |
2 |
Wilms |
7 |
0 |
DOX |
0 |
|
16 |
F |
14 |
Other |
28 |
3 |
Mitomicin
postoperative death |
4 |
Characteristics of patients, treatment and short-term
outcomes
Abbreviate: PCI=Peritoneal Cancer Index; CCs=Completeness of Cytoreduction Score; Complication: Clavien-Dindo Classification; DOX=Doxorubicin; DOP=Cisplatin; Other = 2 ovarian, 1 mesothelioma, 1 colon
3. Results
Children had
a median age of 14 years (range 8-16,4). The histological types included
Desmoid tumors (5), Wilms tumors (5), rhabdomyosarcoma (2) and other (4). The
median peritoneal cancer index was 10.2 (range 6-28). There is 1 postoperative
death.
The median
PCI 10.2 (range 6-28). Procedures required a median operating time of 6h (range
4-10). There is one postoperative death 1/16 (6.25%) due to massive pulmonary
embolism in a colon cancer patient.
All patients
received routine gastric decompression via
Levine tube placement following CRS/HIPEC, with removal occurring between
postoperative days 4-8. No evidence of renal failure or other metabolic
complications.
The major
complications according to the Clavien-Dindo were 3/16 (18.8%).
Postoperatively
patients received chemotherapy (n=13) and radiotherapy (n=8) according to the
different received molecular-targeted therapy. From the 14 patients 8 relapsed
after CRS + HIPEC, tree of them in peritoneal cavity and five in Liver/or
Lungs. The mean time of relapse disease is 2 years after CRS plus HIPEC.
3.1.
Pediatric Malignancies
Of the 16 patients (8 girls, 8 boys) considered in the analysis the median age at surgery was 14 years, ranging from 8 to 16 years. 8 patients (50%) have died whereas 8 (50%) were the censored cases. The median overall survival time was 67 months (95% CI: 13.1 – 120.9). The median disease-free survival time was 46 months (95% CI: 0 – 110) (Figure 1 and Table 2)
Figure 1: Overall Survival function of patients with Pediatric malignancies.
Table 2:
Cumulative proportion surviving at End of Interval.
|
Years
after surgery |
OS |
DFS |
|
1 |
94% |
60% |
|
2 |
73% |
53% |
|
3 |
58% |
53% |
|
4 |
50% |
41% |
|
5 |
50% |
41% |
|
6 |
40% |
41% |
|
7 |
40% |
|
|
8 |
40% |
|
|
9 |
40% |
|
|
10 |
40% |
|
|
11 |
40% |
|
|
12 |
40% |
3.2. Histology
The median OS of Willms, DSRCT, RMS and Other groups weren’t computed because all cases are censored. The OS time of Willms group wasn’t statistically different than DSRCT group, χ2(3) = 1.494 (p = 0.222). The OS time of Willms group wasn’t statistically different than RMS group, χ2(3) = 0.500 (p = 0.480). The OS time of Willms group wasn’t statistically different than other group, χ2(3) = 0.153 (p = 0.696). The OS time of DSRCT group wasn’t statistically different than RMS group, χ2(3) = 1.477 (p = 0.224). The OS time of DSRCT group wasn’t statistically different than other group, χ2(3) = 0.490 (p = 0.484). The OS time of RMS group wasn’t statistically different than other group, χ2(3) = 0.831 (p = 0.362) (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Overall Survival function of patients with Pediatric malignancies (Willms vs. DSRCT vs. RMS vs. Other).
The median DFS of Willms, DSRCT, RMS and Other groups weren’t computed because all cases are censored. The OS time of Willms group wasn’t statistically different than DSRCT group, χ2(3) = 2.824 (p = 0.093). The DFS time of Willms group wasn’t statistically different than RMS group, χ2(3) = 0.400 (p = 0.527). The DFS time of Willms group wasn’t statistically different than other group, χ2(3) = 0.234 (p = 0.629). The DFS time of DSRCT group wasn’t statistically different than RMS group, χ2(3) = 2.248 (p = 0.134). The DFS time of DSRCT group wasn’t statistically different than Other group, χ2(3) = 0.601 (p = 0.438). The DFS time of RMS group wasn’t statistically different than Other group, χ2(3) = 1.250 (p = 0.264) (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Disease-Free Survival function of patients with Pediatric malignancies (Willms vs. DSRCT vs. RMS vs. Other).
3.3. Age
The median OS of age group <13 years were 67 months (95% CI: 9-125). The median OS of age group ≥13 years was 30 months (there wasn’t an observed failure time for which the lower and upper bound of the confidence interval for the KM estimate is less than 0.5). The median OS of age group <13 years wasn’t statistically different than age group ≥13 years, χ2(1) = 0.135 (p = 0.713) (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Overall Survival function of patients with Pediatric malignancies by age category.
4. Discussion
Our study described the twenty years’ experience of Cytoreductive
Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in a
pediatric population with peritoneal metastasis. The results of our study support
that aggressive management with selection criteria offers a safe and feasible
option in children, which are the same findings from other recent options6.
Hyperthermic
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)
is a surgical procedure involving the infusion of heated chemotherapy into the
abdominal cavity, followed by agitation and subsequent drainage. When combined
with CRS, this
approach directly targets peritoneal surfaces that are poorly penetrated by
traditional chemotherapy (IV) due to the peritoneal-plasma
barrier. This method enhances local drug concentration and
eliminates microscopic residual disease7.
As a result, HIPEC has become an integral part of treatment protocols and is
now routinely considered for adult peritoneal
carcinomatosis or sarcomatosis.
However, data on hyperthermic
intraperitoneal chemotherapy use in
pediatric patients with peritoneal malignancies remain scarce, limited to
single-arm studies, case reports and single-institution case
series. The lack of large patient cohorts means there are no
multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating HIPEC’s efficacy in
children. Additionally, patient selection is highly restrictive: candidates
must have resectable tumors, normal organ function and no distant metastases,
though the acceptability of limited liver or lung metastases remains debated in
adult cases8.
Peritoneal
malignancy in children most often occurs when a tumor breaches the organ capsule,
either due to intraoperative spillage during incomplete resection, hematogenous
spread or direct local invasion by malignant peritoneal tumors. The majority
of cases in the literature of children population are DSRCT or Wilms tumors and
same results are observed in our study in which the 50% of cases are DSRCT and
Wilms tumors9-12.
Pediatric peritoneal malignancies usually manifest as
peritoneal sarcomatosis in comparison of peritoneal carcinomatosis which occur
more frequently in adults13,14. In
our study more patients (12/16) presented as sarcomatous and the other 4 cases
are from colon (1), ovarian (2) and mesothelioma (1).
The survival results in our study are very optimistic
with a 5-year survival rate of 50% especially in low PCI patients and without
evidence of secondary deposits in Liver or Lungs.
The morbidity was observed in 20%-40% of adult cases
compared to substantially reduced rates in pediatric patients. In our group the
morbidity rate is 25%. Limitations of our study include various histological
types, few cases of each study due to the rare incidence in children.
The establishment of an international pediatric hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy database-incorporating both retrospective and prospective patient data-would significantly advance future research and clinical practice in this field. While a Belgian hospital currently maintains such a registry (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01617382, accessed 30/03/2023), its global uptake remains unclear. The PSOGI (Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International) registry, though valuable, focuses primarily on adult populations with appendiceal neoplasms, rare tumors and mesothelioma. While this framework could inform pediatric efforts, the unique complexities of childhood peritoneal malignancies warrant dedicated analysis.
5. Acknowledgment: We acknowledgment for secretarial assistance Hayarpi Saroyan.
6. References