Recent advancements
in artificial intelligence, particularly in computer vision and deep learning,
have led to the emergence of numerous generative AI platforms that have the
ability to create high-quality artistic media, including visual art, concept art
and digital illustrations. These generative AI tools have the potential to
fundamentally alter the creative processes by which artists and designers
formulate ideas and bring them into fruition. However, the application of these
AI-generated image tools in the field of graphic design has not been
extensively explored.
The realm of
multimedia is being revolutionized by the advent of Generative AI, which is
reshaping creative workflows, simplifying content creation and unlocking new
avenues for multimedia storytelling. This technology holds the promise of
producing enthralling visuals for documentaries from mere historical texts or
crafting personalized, interactive multimedia experiences that cater to
individual preferences. The influence of generative imaging is palpable, from
the high-resolution cameras in our smartphones to the immersive experiences
crafted by cutting-edge technologies. This study ventures into the dynamic
domain of Generative AI, spotlighting its groundbreaking role in image
generation. It delves into the evolution of traditional imaging in consumer electronics
and the impetus behind AI integration, which has significantly expanded
application capabilities. The research meticulously evaluates the latest
breakthroughs in leading-edge technologies such as DALL-E 2, Craiyon, Stable
Diffusion, Imagen, Jasper, Night Cafe and Deep AI, gauging their performance
based on image quality, variety and efficiency. It also contemplates the
constraints and moral dilemmas introduced by this fusion, seeking a harmony
between human ingenuity and AI-driven automation. This study stems from its
thorough analysis and juxtaposition of these AI platforms, yielding perceptive
findings that illuminate their merits and potential enhancements. The
conclusion accentuates the transformative power of Generative AI in the sphere
of image generation, setting the stage for subsequent research and innovation
to further advance and polish these technologies. This paper acts as an
essential resource for grasping the present state and future directions of
AI-enabled image creation, providing a window into the burgeoning collaboration
between human artistry and machine intelligence.
Keywords:
Gen AI models, Gen AI tools, Variational Autoencoders, Diffusion models, Stable
Diffusion, AIML, Image prompt, Medical Imaging.
In the realm of
imaging, this technology has unlocked a myriad of opportunities for creative
professionals, medical experts and researchers alike. It is transforming the
imaging landscape by empowering creators, customizing user experiences and
enhancing accessibility. Generative AI streamlines tasks, produces diverse
content variations and crafts entirely new visuals, allowing creators to
concentrate on storytelling and design. It customizes images to match user
preferences and promotes inclusivity by generating captions, translating
languages, and creating image descriptions. These advancements represent a
significant leap forward in how we create and experience visual content.
Generative AI in imaging has profoundly impacted various aspects of our lives,
heralding a new era of visual content creation and manipulation. Its influence
spans multiple domains, from art and entertainment to healthcare and beyond.
The paper presents a
thorough examination of Generative AI models' impact on imaging. Key
contributions include: (1) A detailed analysis of Variational Autoencoders
(VAEs),
(2) Transformers,
(3) Autoregressive
models
(4) Diffusion models
and
(5) Generative
Adversarial
Networks (GANs) and
Generative AI Tools Stable Diffusion, Craiyon, Artbreeder, NightCafe, Jasper,
BigGAN, StyleGAN, Pix2Pix, Midjourney, IMAGEN, DeepDream, Deep AI and DALL-E 2.
The advent of
generative adversarial networks and other generative AI models have enabled the
creation of plausible, high-quality images that can serve as a starting point
for creative expression. These tools can augment the creativity of human
artists and designers by generating novel ideas and concepts, allowing them to
explore a wider range of possibilities and push the boundaries of their work.
As generative AI becomes more sophisticated, it is poised to play an
increasingly important role in the creative industries, potentially
transforming the ways in which art and design are conceived and produced.
Generative AI models,
such as DALL-E 2, Craiyon, Stable Diffusion and Imagen, have demonstrated their
ability to generate diverse and visually appealing images based on textual
prompts.
AI's capacity to
rejuvenate and colorize ancient photographs is a boon for photographers and
historians, making history leap off the page with striking clarity. In the
realm of healthcare, generative AI is revolutionizing the field by producing
synthetic medical imagery to train diagnostic tools, enhancing the quality of
patient treatment significantly1.
The methodology
includes analyzing different machine learning models for data generation,
especially in generative modeling, such as Variational Autoencoders (VAEs),
Transformers, Autoregressive models, Diffusion models and Generative
Adversarial Networks (GANs). This review aims to understand the unique
characteristics, strengths and limitations of each approach, as well as their
suitability for various multimedia content generation tasks.
It also includes a
comprehensive comparison of AI tools and models designed for image generation
or manipulation, such as IIMAGEN, Deep Dream, Deep AI, NightCafe, DALL-E 2,
Stable Diffusion, Jasper, Artbreeder, BigGAN, StyleGAN and Pix2Pix. The
analysis focuses on the image quality, diversity and efficiency of these
models, as well as their potential impact on creative industries and other
applications.
The development of
powerful generative models has been a significant driver in the advancement of
Generative AI These models, such as Variational Autoencoders, Transformers,
Autoregressive models, Diffusion models and Generative Adversarial Networks,
have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in generating diverse and
high-quality multimedia content.
3.1. Variational
Autoencoders
Variational
Autoencoders (VAEs) are a type of generative model that combines the principles
of autoencoders and variational inference. They are used to generate new data
samples that are similar to the training data. VAEs consist of two main
components (Figure 1): an encoder which maps the input data to a latent
space and a decoder which reconstructs the input from the latent
representation. VAEs can generate high-quality images, but they may struggle
with capturing complex, fine-grained details in the output2.
|
|
Figure 1:
Image flow (Encoder and decoder flow) of VAEs.
Key Concepts
Ø Latent
Space: A lower-dimensional space where the
input data is represented.
Ø Reparameterization
Trick: A technique used to allow
backpropagation through the stochastic sampling process.
Ø Loss
Function: Combines reconstruction loss (how well
the output matches the input) and KL divergence (how well the learned
distribution matches the prior distribution).
VAEs can be used to
generate complex images by learning the underlying distribution of the training
images and then sampling from this distribution to create new images. This is
particularly useful in applications like image synthesis, data augmentation and
anomaly detection.
Please see below the
program screen shot run for generating/optimizing model for image generation.
Program contains
following process (Figure 2).
|
|
|
Fig 2 |
|
|
Please see the VAEs
program as follows (Figure 3).
|
|
|
|
|
Fig 3 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
VAEs |
|
|
|
program |
|
|
|
|
Program run for 50
epochs with loss function data reduced to 104.60(Figure 4).
|
|
|
Fig 4 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
Execution
result |
|
|
Please see the image created as part of
modeling optimization (Figure 5).
|
|
Figure 5
3.2. Transformers
The Transformer model
is a type of neural network architecture that has revolutionized natural
language processing (NLP) and other fields. Transformers use self-attention
mechanisms to capture long-range dependencies in the input data, allowing them
to generate coherent and contextual output.
Key Components of the
Transformer Model
Ø Self-Attention
Mechanism: This is the core innovation of the
Transformer. It allows the model to weigh the importance of different words in
a sentence when encoding a particular word. This mechanism helps the model
understand context more effectively than previous models like RNNs or LSTMs.
Ø Encoder-Decoder
Structure: The Transformer consists of an encoder
and a decoder, each made up of multiple layers. The encoder processes the input
sequence and generates a set of encodings, which are then used by the decoder
to produce the output sequence.
Ø Multi-Head
Attention: Instead of having a single attention
mechanism, Transformers use multiple attention heads. This allows the model to
focus on different parts of the input sequence simultaneously, capturing
various aspects of the context.
Ø Feed-Forward
Neural Networks: Each layer in both the encoder and
decoder contains a fully connected feed-forward network, which processes the
attention outputs.
Ø Positional
Encoding: Since Transformers do not have a
built-in sense of the order of words (unlike RNNs), they use positional
encodings to inject information about the position of each word in the
sequence.
|
|
Figure6:
explains input embedding and out embedding flow.
Autoregressive models
are a class of generative models that generate data sequentially, where each
new sample is predicted based on the previously generated samples. These
models, such as PixelRNN and PixelCNN, can produce high-quality images by
learning the underlying distribution of the training data and then sampling
from this distribution to create new samples.
Autoregressive models
are versatile tools used across various fields for predictive purposes.
Professionals employ these models in numerous ways, such as forecasting future
stock prices, estimating annual earthquake occurrences, analyzing protein
sequences in genetics, projecting patient health outcomes, tracking symptom
progression over time, monitoring the spread of diseases in animals and
predicting patterns in circadian rhythms3-5.
|
|
|
Fig 7 |
|
|
|
explains
Autoregressive model |
|
flow. |
|
|
Diffusion models are
a category of generative models that are trained to create data by inverting a
diffusion process. This process incrementally introduces noise into the data,
which the model is then trained to remove, allowing it to generate new data samples.
Notably successful in producing high-quality images, diffusion models are
generally more stable during training as they do not depend on adversarial
methods. Their versatility extends to various data types, such as images, audio
and text, and they can be tailored to diverse domains, grounded in
wellestablished principles of statistical physics and probability theory.
How Diffusion Models
Work
Ø Forward
Diffusion Process: In the forward
process, a clean image is gradually corrupted by adding Gaussian noise over
several time steps. This process is designed to be reversible.
Ø Reverse
Diffusion Process: In the reverse
process, the model learns to denoise the image step-by-step, starting from pure
noise and gradually refining it to produce a clear image. The model is trained
to predict the noise added at each step, allowing it to reverse the corruption process.
|
|
|
Fig |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
explains
Diffusion |
|
|
|
model
|
|
and
|
|
workflow |
|
. |
|
|
Please see the execution result of diffusion
model having 8 epoch cycle and result in loss function value 0.00202 (Figure
8).
|
|
|
|
Figure 9:
explains the Diffusion model execution result.
The basic idea behind
diffusion models is rather simple. They take the input image x0x0 and gradually
add Gaussian noise to it through a series of TT steps. We will call this the
forward process. Notably, this is unrelated to the forward pass of a neural
network. If you'd like, this part is necessary to generate the targets for our
neural network (the image after applying t<Tt<T noise steps).
Afterward, a neural
network is trained to recover the original data by reversing the noising
process. By being able to model the reverse process, we can generate new data.
This is the socalled reverse diffusion process or, in general, the sampling
process of a generative model.
Generative
Adversarial Networks (GANs) are a class of machine learning frameworks designed
by Ian Goodfellow and his colleagues in 2014. GANs consist of two neural
networks, the generator and the discriminator, which are trained simultaneously
through adversarial processes. The generator creates data that mimics real
data, while the discriminator evaluates the authenticity of the generated data.
Today Generative AI
has profoundly transformed the field of imaging. It leverages advanced machine
learning techniques to create, enhance, and manipulate images in ways that were
once considered the realm of science fiction. This transformative technology is
centered around the development of algorithms and models that can autonomously
generate images, modify existing ones, or even fill in missing information
within images.
|
|
|
Fig |
|
10 |
|
|
|
explains
the |
|
GANs |
|
|
|
execution
|
|
result. |
|
|
|
|
Following an overview
of fundamental Generative AI models and their impact, we now focus on specific
technologies in image synthesis from text descriptions. Generative AI models
represent a diverse range of technical approaches and applications in the field
of text-to-image generation. From state-of-the-art models like DALL-E 2 and
Imagen to accessible tools like NightCafe and Stable Diffusion, each model
offers unique strengths and capabilities that cater to unique needs and use
cases. Please see the strength and application of these Gen AI tools in the
following categories.
These models
represent the cutting edge of text-to-image generation, pushing the boundaries
of what’s possible.
1.
DALL-E 2
o
Strengths:
High-quality, diverse image generation with detailed and coherent outputs.
o
Applications:
Creative content generation, advertising, design and research.
2.
Imagen
o
Strengths:
Produces highly realistic images with accurate semantic content.
o
Applications:
Research, creative industries and content creation.
These models showcase
a range of technical approaches, providing a comprehensive understanding of the
different techniques driving the field.
1.
Deep AI
o Strengths:
Grounded in GANs, offering a different technical approach compared to
transformer-based models.
o
Applications:
Artistic creation, research, educational tools, and creative projects.
2.
BigGAN
o
Strengths:
High-quality, high-resolution image generation with diverse outputs.
o
Applications:
Research, high-quality image synthesis, creative industries and academic
studies.
3.
StyleGAN
o
Strengths:
High-quality image generation with detailed control over style and features.
o
Applications:
Art creation, design, research and commercial projects.
4.
Pix2Pix
o Strengths:
Versatile image-to-image translation with practical applications.
o
Applications:
Image editing, artistic creation, research and educational tools.
5.
DeepDream
o
Strengths:
Unique artistic effects and visualizations.
o
Applications:
Art creation, visual effects, educational tools and creative experimentation6
These models include
both open-access options and research-focused models, providing insights into
both cutting-edge advancements and user-friendly tools.
1.
NightCafe
o Strengths:
User-friendly interface with multiple model options for diverse artistic
styles.
o
Applications:
Creative projects, personal use, educational purposes and community engagement.
2.
Stable Diffusion
o Strengths:
High-quality outputs with a focus on accessibility and community contributions.
o
Applications:
Creative content, research, community-driven projects and opensource
development.
These models have
distinct strengths and are known for their specific applications.
1.
Jasper
o Strengths:
High-quality text generation that complements image generation tasks.
o Applications:
Content creation, marketing, automated writing and customer service.
2.
Artbreeder
o
Strengths:
Interactive and collaborative platform for generating and evolving images.
o
Applications:
Art creation, character design, collaborative projects and personal use.
This grouping
provides a clear understanding of the generative AI models based on their
state-ofthe-art status, technical diversity, accessibility, strengths and
applications. Each model offers unique capabilities that cater to different
needs and use cases in the field of text-to-image generation7-9.
Here we are talking
about comprehensive comparison (Figure 10) from the various execution
result on mentioned Gen AI models in terms of parameters like Technical
Aspects, Performance and Robustness, Customization and Control, Ethical and
Accessibility and User Experience and Handling of these technologies based on the
following parameters.
|
|
Figure 11:
presents a comprehensive comparison of Gen AI models used for image creation.
This section is
talking about practical comparison of visual images generated.
We undertake a
detailed comparative analysis of four distinct models: Stable Diffusion,
Craiyon, Artbreeder and NightCafe. Chosen for their broad adoption, varied
technological methodologies and distinctive features, our aim is to rigorously
assess and compare each model's performance and artistic prowess. This will be
achieved by testing them against six carefully curated and demanding case
scenarios, each designed to cover a broad range of visual content. This
approach ensures a comprehensive evaluation of the models' abilities. The
assessment criteria will focus on image quality, consistency, artistic
expression, and the precision of converting textual prompts into corresponding
visual representations.
The six distinct case
scenarios (Flying car, Crowd face, Joyful elephants, A robot welding, Sunrise
at mountain lake, Cozy rustic kitchen) (Figure 11) were chosen for the
analysis because they represent a broad spectrum of visual content.
This thorough
comparative analysis is designed to illuminate the strengths and weaknesses of
each model, as well as their appropriateness for various artistic and practical
endeavors. By assessing their capabilities in demanding situations, we provide
artists, developers and researchers with the necessary insights to choose an
image synthesis technology that best fits their unique creative or functional
goals.
|
|
Figure 12:
shows a comparison of images generated by AI models, created using specific
prompts.
Please see the
comprehensive comparison of the four models across our six test scenarios. This
analysis offers valuable insights into the distinct strengths and limitations
of each model, empowering users to select the most suitable technology for
their specific needs and objectives, whether they are pursuing creative,
practical or research-oriented tasks.
7. Flying Car
Ø
Stable Diffusion:
The images were visually striking and captured the futuristic theme well, with
minor issues in rendering some elements like flying cars. The cityscape was
well-rendered with a futuristic look.
Ø
Craiyon:
Good overall quality with detailed cityscapes but occasional distortions in
flying cars. The flying cars were present but sometimes appeared slightly
distorted or out of proportion.
Ø
Artbreeder:
The images were aesthetically pleasing and creative, capturing the essence of a
futuristic cityscape, but with a more artistic rather than realistic approach.
Artistic and visually appealing images with well-integrated but stylized flying
cars.
Ø
Nightcafe:
Nightcafe exhibited the poorest performance among the models. The cityscape
lacked detail and coherence. The flying cars were either missing or poorly
rendered, often blending into the background.
Ø
Stable Diffusion:
Poor performance with lack of detail and coherence in both faces and
background. The expressions were not well-captured, often appearing unnatural
or missing entirely.
Ø
Craiyon:
Vibrant and detailed images with realistic expressions and a coherent
background, capturing the prompt effectively. The images were visually striking
and captured the prompt well, with minor issues in rendering some elements.
Ø
Artbreeder:
Artistic and visually appealing images with well-captured expressions but more
stylized than realistic. The background was present and integrated well with
the faces, though it had an artistic rather than realistic look.
Ø
Nightcafe:
Good overall quality with detailed faces and expressions, though occasional
distortions were present. The background of the stadium was present but
sometimes lacked detail and coherence.
Ø Stable
Diffusion: Poor performance with lack of detail and
coherence in both the landscape and the animals. The elephants and other
animals were poorly rendered, often blending into the background or appearing
unnatural.
Ø Craiyon:
High-quality images with detailed and vivid jungle landscapes, well-rendered
elephants, and vibrant animals. The background was detailed with dense foliage
and flowering trees, adding to the overall realism.
Ø Artbreeder:
Vibrant and detailed images with realistic jungle landscapes, joyful elephants
and colorful animals, capturing the prompt effectively. The background was
detailed and coherent, with dense foliage and flowering trees adding to the
overall realism.
Ø NightCafe:
Artistic and visually appealing images with well-integrated but stylized
animals and a creative jungle landscape. The elephants and other animals were
wellintegrated into the scene, though they sometimes appeared more stylized
than realistic.
Ø Stable
Diffusion: Poor performance with lack of detail
and coherence in both the workshop and the robot. The images were far from
realistic, with a lack of clear structure and detail in both the workshop and
the robot.
Ø Craiyon:
High-quality images with detailed and realistic workshop environments,
wellrendered robots and welding operations. The images were vivid and
realistic, capturing the essence of a robot welding in a cluttered workshop.
Ø Artbreeder:
Artistic and visually appealing images with well-integrated but stylized robots
and a creative workshop environment. The robot and welding operation were
wellintegrated into the scene, though they sometimes appeared more stylized
than realistic.
Ø Nightcafe:
Vibrant and detailed images with realistic workshop environments, accurate
robot and welding operations, capturing the prompt effectively. The robot and
welding operation were depicted accurately, with sparks flying and welding
residue visible on the robot's body.
11. Sunrise at Mountain Lake
Ø
Stable Diffusion:
Not biased performance with small lack of detail and coherence in both the lake
and the surrounding environment. The images were far from realistic, with a
lack of clear structure and detail in both the lake and the surrounding
environment.
Ø
Craiyon:
High-quality images with detailed and realistic lake environments, well rendered
surrounding elements, and integrated cabin and trees. The images were vivid and
realistic, capturing the essence of a serene mountain lake at sunrise.
Ø
Artbreeder:
Artistic and visually appealing images with well-integrated but stylized
elements and a creative lake environment. The images were aesthetically
pleasing and creative, capturing the essence of a serene mountain lake at
sunrise with a more artistic approach.
Ø
Nightcafe:
Vibrant and detailed images with realistic lake environments, accurate
surrounding elements, and well-integrated cabin and deer, capturing the prompt
effectively. The towering pine trees and snow-capped peaks were depicted
accurately, adding to the overall realism.
Ø Stable
Diffusion: High-quality images with detailed and
realistic kitchen environments, well-rendered fireplace, wooden beams, table
setting, cat and sunlight. The table set with freshly baked bread and a pot of
stew was detailed and realistic.
Ø Craiyon:
The images were vivid and realistic, capturing the essence of a cozy, rustic
kitchen. The cat curled near to fireplace and the sunlight streaming through
the window with flower boxes were well-integrated into the scene.
Ø Artbreeder:
Artistic and visually appealing images with well-integrated but stylized
elements and a creative kitchen environment. The cozy, rustic kitchen ambiance
was well-captured with realistic lighting.
Ø Nightcafe:
Vibrant and detailed images with realistic kitchen environments, accurate
fireplace, wooden beams, table setting, cat, and sunlight, capturing the prompt
effectively. The table setting with bread and stew was present but had an
artistic rather than realistic look10-15
We all talk about how
generative AI models have the potential to revolutionize the creative industry,
what are the general model algorithms and most useful Geni AI solution in the
market and compared images created by it. We also need to discuss challenges as
well.
The challenges
associated (Figure 12) with including Generative AI (GAI) in imaging are
multifaceted and require a comprehensive approach. Let us List those and
discuss them in detail in the below table.
|
|
To summarize, the
integration of Generative AI into imaging presents a multitude of challenges
spanning ethical, privacy, security, legal and technological aspects. Tackling
these issues necessitates a comprehensive strategy that includes technical
solutions, continuous research, interdisciplinary and international
cooperation.
This paper is
meticulously reviewed by Mr. Shantanu Sengupta, Senior Director - Projects at
Cognizant, whose invaluable insights and expertise significantly enriched the
quality and depth of this study. His critical assessment of the research
methodology, analysis and the presentation of the latest advancements in AI
image generation, as well as his thoughtful suggestions for enhancing the
discussion on moral dilemmas and potential improvements of AI platforms, have
been instrumental in refining the final manuscript.
The advancement of
artificial intelligence has revolutionized artistic practices, leading to the
creation of dynamic AI art communities dedicated to fostering collaboration and
innovation. As research into generative image creation deepens, it's crucial to
consider the future trajectory of these communities. Trends suggest a growing
focus on interdisciplinary collaboration, uniting artists, technologists and
academics to push the limits of creativity. This fusion of varied insights is
anticipated to produce more nuanced artistic works and spur the development of
novel techniques surpassing conventional approaches.
Moreover, the
increasing accessibility of AI tools promises to make the creative process more
democratic, allowing a wider array of people to engage with AI art communities.
Progress in intuitive interfaces and open-source platforms will enable
beginners and hobbyists to delve into generative AI, creating a welcoming space
for education and idea exchange. This evolution will not only foster a sense of
community but also propel innovation through shared creativity. These focused
collectives will support concentrated research and trials, significantly
contributing to the larger AI art community. By dedicating efforts to specific
uses of generative AI, researchers aim to discover new methods and enhance
existing ones.
As technology
evolves, it is essential to remain proactive in addressing these issues and
driving innovation in the field. Future improvements for generative AI in
multimedia include:
AI-powered Story
Weaving: Generative AI tools can assist
multimedia developers in crafting their stories by generating various concept
art sketches from high-level story descriptions or suggesting visually
captivating multimedia that aligns with the narrative’s emotional tone. This
enhances both agility and creativity in the development process.
Interpretable AI in
Multimedia: Creating explainable AI techniques
tailored for the multimedia domain enables users to comprehend the reasoning
behind AI-generated content.
This approach
promotes trust and transparency.
Technological
Advancements: Future efforts should aim to enhance
the realism, quality, scalability, robustness, and semantic coherence of
multimedia. Investigating the integration of various generative AI models (such
as VAEs, GANs, Transformers and Autoregressive Models) can spur innovation.
Additionally, advancing data compression techniques will facilitate the
efficient storage and transmission of multimedia content.
Countering Deepfakes
and Disinformation: Research findings
can guide the creation of effective deepfake detection techniques specifically
designed for the multimedia field. This enables users to critically assess
multimedia content and reduce the spread of misinformation.
User Behavior
Analysis: Creating generative AI models that
dynamically adjust to user preferences in real-time has the potential to
transform multimedia content delivery. By offering personalized and customized
content, we can ensure that each user gets exactly what they desire, enhancing
their engagement and satisfaction.
Image synthesis
technology has the potential to transform numerous fields. Here are some key
areas it can influence:
Materials Science:
AI can facilitate virtual testing and optimization of new material properties
before they are physically created, speeding up innovation. Additionally, it
plays a vital role in simulating material degradation over time, enabling
non-destructive testing, preventative maintenance, and enhancements in
infrastructure safety.
Medical Imaging:
Image synthesis can improve early disease detection by analyzing medical scans,
like mammograms, to spot subtle anomalies, resulting in better patient
outcomes.
Additionally, it
enables doctors to simulate treatment effects on a patient’s condition,
allowing for personalized treatment plans and enhancing surgical results
through AI-generated 3D models of organs and tissues.
Space research:
AI can enhance planetary imaging by analyzing telescope data to eliminate noise
and improve images of distant planets, uncovering essential atmospheric details
and the potential for life. Furthermore, AI can create simulations of Martian
landscapes, supporting mission planning and astronaut training.
The intersection of
technology and the arts within the multimedia sphere has long fascinated
researchers. The advent of Generative AI marks a pivotal shift in this
narrative, fundamentally altering the production of multimedia and the
collaborative nature of creation. Generative AI has been a game-changer in
image generation, expanding the horizons of creativity and partnership. It has
not only enhanced human creative capabilities but also made the content
creation process more efficient, encouraging new forms of collaboration between
AI systems and human artists. The paper thoroughly examines cutting-edge
Generative AI models, such as Stable Diffusion, Craiyon, Artbreeder, NightCafe,
Jasper, BigGAN, StyleGAN, Pix2Pix, Midjourney, IIMAGEN, DeepDream, Deep AI, and
DALL-E 2, evaluating their effectiveness in terms of image quality, diversity,
interpretability, and computational efficiency. This integration of AI with
image generation delves into text-to-image synthesis, where AI converts textual
descriptions into compelling visual art. Nonetheless, this advancement also
reveals a complex web of ethical dilemmas and challenges.
The future of AI art
communities is poised for significant transformation, driven by
interdisciplinary collaboration, increased accessibility, specialization, and
ethical considerations. As researchers navigate this dynamic landscape, their
contributions will play a vital role in shaping the trajectory of generative
image creation. By embracing these future directions, AI art communities can
enhance their impact on the broader artistic ecosystem, redefining the role of
technology in creative expression. The ongoing dialogue between researchers,
artists and technologists will be essential in unlocking the full potential of
AI as a transformative force in the world of art.
2.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02781
4.
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5_1
6.
Batra K, Kavidayal M. Animating Still
Images. Cornell University 2022.
7.
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3397775
9.
https://doi.org/10.1109/airc57904.2023.10303174
10.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3302700
11.
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/452/1/012050
12.
Interior renders Tutorial, 2020.
13.
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/383259.383306
16.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00080
17.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.15129
18.
https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA24808561
19.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.14092
20.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04542
21.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.01795
22.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04141
23.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.06576
24.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04812
25.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.04469
26.
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3478513.3480485
28.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9634015
29.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08629
30.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.09515
31.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.03390
32.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2022/4956839
33.
https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icelaic-19/125934179
34.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.02398