Full Text

Research Article

Comparative Performance of Methods for Measuring Malaria Parasite Density in Blood Samples


Abstract

Malaria is a life-threatening parasitic disease transmitted by mosquitoes. It remains the most clinically important of the tropical diseases, widespread through the tropics. The study was done to correlate the malaria parasite density with different age ranges using WBC counts (6,000/mm3, 7,500/mm3, 8,000/mm3) as reference standard and the actual total WBC count. A total of 54 blood samples of three age ranges (< 5 years, 5-15, and > 15 years) were used. There was a significant correlation (Pearson(r) = 0.6664, P < 0.0001) between malaria parasite count and the total white blood cell count of all the age groups (< 5 years, 5-15, and > 15 years). There was a significant decrease (F = 9.988, P = 0.0002) in the total white blood cell count between patients < 5 years, > 15 years. On the other hand, when malaria parasite density for patients in the age range < 5 years using 6,000/mm3, 7,500/mm3, 8,000/mm3 and actual total white blood cell count respectively was calculated, there was a significant difference (F = 47.69, P < 0.001). The analysis of variance of patients in the age range 5-15 years also showed a significant difference (F =30.85, P < 0.0001) when different total WBC counts of 6,000/mm3, 7,500/mm3, 8,000/mm3 and the actual were used respectively. It can be concluded from the results of this study that using the average total WBC count of 8,000/mm3 was most unsatisfactory for determining parasite density in most clinical situations. The number of parasites per total WBC and the actual WBC count was found to be the most accurate.

Keywords: Malaria, Parasite, Density, Mosquitoes, Parasitic disease

1. Introduction

Malaria is a life-threatening parasitic disease transmitted by mosquitoes. It remains the most clinically important of the tropical diseases, widespread through the tropics. The disease exacts a heavy toll of illness and death among children especially in endemic areas1. Malaria caused parasitic disease is seen in more than 300 million people and at least one million deaths annually2. Ninety percent of deaths due to malaria occur in Africa South of the Sahara mostly among young children. It kills an African child every 30 seconds2. Malaria is the most common cause of outpatient clinic attendance among all age groups in Nigeria and it is responsible for an estimated 300, 000 deaths yearly in children less than five years old (FMOH, 1980-1983).

 

The detection of malaria parasite in peripheral veins or capillary blood has always been considered an indispensable basis for the definition and diagnosis of malaria3,4. In the simple determination of parasite density, data collection has usually been limited to a single time point. Little is known about the natural variations in parasite density in the peripheral blood during the course of a day or a week3,4. In a single individual, parasite density varies spontaneously during the course of several days follow-up. Such variations can lead to an erroneous estimation of the community load of malaria infection3-6.

 

High parasite densities may be observed in symptom free individuals, while scores of malaria attacks may occur among those with no detectable parasites and there is no obligate temporal correlation between the occurrence of fever and parasite density3. The calculation of the total number of parasites/microlitre (or mm3) of blood requires the knowledge of the normal range of white blood cells (WBC) in various age groups. Different WBC values have been used in calculation of malaria parasite density based on assumption. The value of 8,000 WBC/mm3 has been generally assumed2,4,5,7-10. Another assumed average leucocytes concentration value of 7,500 leucocytes/mm3 has equally been used3. While 6,000 leucocytes/ mm3 has equally been employed5,11,12. These values may not be same in all age groups.

 

It is not known whether these methods give a good approximation of the parasite density. It has been observed that a common weak point in the estimation of parasite levels by counting parasites against a particular number of WBC is the (incorrect) assumption that all blood samples contain 8,000 WBC/mm3 of blood13. Moreover, different age groups have varying WBC counts. Their normal ranges are infants from day one ---3 yrs: 7,500/mm3 + 3,500/mm3 (Dacie and Lewis, 1985); children from 1yr -- 4yrs: 6,000 ­­–18,000/mm3; children between 4 -- 7years: 5,000 – 15,000/mm3; adults: 4,000 - 11,000/mm314.

 

2. Materials and Method

2.1. Study area and subjects

The study was conducted in the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria. Most of the inhabitants of Enugu are of the Igbo tribe and the area has a wet and rainy season. The subjects were clinically selected malaria patients from the Pediatric clinic of the UNTH.

 

The target populations were children less than 5 years of age, teenagers with the age bracket 5-15years and adults greater than 15 years of age.

 

Fifty-four (54) blood samples were collected via finger-pricking using sterile blood lancet into sterile EDTA (anticoagulant) containers.

 

3. Methods of Analysis

3.1. Thick blood film preparation and staining

The thick blood film preparation and staining using Giemsa method (Silverton et al., 1998).

 

3.2. Procedure

Thick blood films were prepared by making a blood smear with a drop of blood on a clean grease-free slide. The films were allowed to air-dry. The dried thick film was covered with 1in 10 dilution of stock Giemsa stain (filtered) with buffered distilled water pH 7.0. After 30 minutes, the stain was washed off using buffered distilled water. The back of the slide was wiped off and the slide was laced in a slide rack to dry vertically.

 

3.3. Examination

The leucocytes were counted in batches of 100, 200, 400, and 800, using oil immersion (x 100) objective. The malaria parasites were counted alongside each batch of leucocyte (WBC). A total of four counts for each batch were done, and the average count of malaria parasite for each batch was obtained and used in the calculation of malaria density.

 

3.4. Counting of total white blood cells

Total white blood cell count using Turks solution7.

 

3.4.1. Procedure: About 0.02ml of anticoagulated blood from finger prick was added to 0.38ml of diluting fluid in a tube and mixed. The solution was allowed to stand for 4 minutes to lyse the red cells and tinge the white cells, a cover glass was placed on to an Improved Neubauer counting chamber. The solution containing the white cells was mixed and used to charge the counting chamber using a Pasteur pipette. The chamber was left undisturbed for 2 minutes, to allow the cells to settle, and the cells were counted using (x10) and (x40) objectives.

 

A total white blood cells were calculated using the counted value.

             WBC = N X 20 X 106

                            5 X 0.1

Where N = Number of cells counted

            20 = The dilution factor (DF)

            5mm3 = Area counted (A)

            0.1mm = The depth of the counting chamber (D)

Results expressed in /mm3 (Silverton et al, 1998).

Normal Ranges: Infants from day one – 3yrs: 7,500/mm3 + 3,500/mm3 (Dacie and Lewis, 1985).

Children from 1yr – 4years: 6,000 – 18,000/mm3.

Children between 4 – 7years: 5,000 – 15,000/mm3.

Adults 4,000 – 11,000/mm3.

 

Determination of Parasite Densities

        X No of parasites   x    s/mm3

         (n) WBC                         1       

Where: X = no of malaria parasite counted

             N = no of white blood cell counted per field (100, 200, 400, 0r 800).

             s/mm3 = the total WBC count (using 6,000/mm3, 7,500/mm3 or 8,000/mm3).

 

4. Results

A total of 54 blood samples of three age groups (<5yrs, 5-15yrs and > 15years) were analysed for the malaria parasite density using different total white blood cell counts. There was a significant correlation (Pearson(r) = 0.6664, P<0.0001); see fig. 41 graph.

 

(Table 1) shows the mean (+SD) of total white blood cell count of the different age groups. The results show a decrease (F = 9.988, P = 0.0002) in the total white blood cell count from patients < 5 years to > 15 years.

 

(Table 2) represents the mean values and standard deviation of the malaria parasite density of the different age groups using the actual WBC count. The malaria parasite density was calculated after using 100, 200, 400 and 800 WBC respectively. Analysis of variance showed that there were no significant changes (F = 0.1502, P = 0.929) for age group < 5 years; F = 0.1035, P = 0.9577 for age groups 5 – 15 years and F = 0.1423, P = 0.9344 for age group > 15 years) in the parasite densities in each age group when 100, 200, 400 and 800 WNCs were counted.

 

(Table 3) shows the different malaria parasite density of different age groups using 6,000/ as the total WBC count. Analysis of variance showed no significant changes (F = 0.1748, P = 0.9130 for age group <5 yrs, F = 0.1429, P = 0.9330 for age groups 5 - 15 yrs and F = 0.2093, P = 0.8898 for age group >15 yrs) in the parasite densities in each age group when 100, 200, 400, and 800 WBCs, were counted.

Table 1: Showing the total white blood cell count of the different age groups.

Age

Range

Mean

Standard deviation

<5 years

5,700 – 28,800

12,980

7,412

5 – 15 years

4,000 – 19,200

8,305

4,273

>15 years

2,400 – 10,600

6,359

2,108

F = 9.988, P = 0.0002

 

 

 

 

Table 2: Malaria parasite density of different age groups using their actual total WBC counts.

Age

100

200

400

800

F/P values

T2 <5yrs

7,617+

7,311+

5,622+

7,892+

F = 0.1502

10,055

9,420

4,889

13,210

P = 0.9291

T6 5 – 15yrs

9,647+

10,750+

10,970+

12,040+

F = 0.1035

11,480

12,680

13,780

16,150

P = 0.9577

T7 >15yrs

2,550+

2,803+

2,802+

3,001+

F = 0.1423

2,014

2,041

2,316

3,472

P = 0.9344

 

Table 3: Shows the different malaria parasite density of different age groups using 6,000/ as the total WBC count.  

Age

100

200

400

800

F/P values

T8 <5yrs

2931+

2849+

2473+

2926+

F = 0.1748

1858

1770

979

2771

P = 0.9130

T9 5 – 15yrs

5595+

6179+

6215+

6748+

F = 0.1420

4433

4934

5660

6946

P = 0.9330

T10 >15yrs

2333+

2595+

2586+

2738+

F = 0.2093

1339

1477

1689

2788

P = 0.8898

 

(Table 4) represents the malaria parasite density of different age groups using 7,500/mm3 as the total WBC count. Its analysis of variance showed no significant changes (F = 0.174, P = 0.9135, for age group <5yrs, F = 0.1429, P = 0.9339 for age group 5 - 15 yrs and F = 0.1963, P = 0.8987 for age group >15yrs) in the parasite densities in each age group when 100, 200, 400 and 800 WBC, were counted.

 

(Table 5) Show the malaria parasite density of different age groups using 8,000/mm3 as the total WBC count. Analysis of variance showed no significant changes (F = 0.1757, P = 0.9124 for age group <5yrs, F = 0.1429, P = 0.9339 for age group 5 - 15 yrs and F = 0.2090, P = 8899 for age group >15yrs) in the parasite densities in each age group when 100, 200, 400 and 800 WBC, were counted.

 

(Table 6) indicates the malaria parasite density for patients in the age range <5yrs using 6,000/mm3, 7,500/mm3, 8,000/mm3 and the actual total WBC count respectively in the calculation. The analysis of variance showed a significant difference (F = 47.69, P <0.0001) in the malaria parasite density using different total WBC counts.

 

Table 4: Malaria parasite density using 7,500/mm3 as WBC count.

Age

100

200

400

800

F/P values

T11 <5yrs

3664+

3557+

3091+

3658+

F = 0.1741

2323

2216

1223

3464

P = 0.9135

T12 5 – 15yrs

6994+

7723+

7768+

8435+

F = 0.1429

5541

6167

7075

8682

P = 0.9339

T13 >15yrs

2935+

3203+

3122+

3422+

F = 0.1963

1667

1872

1999

3485

P = 0.8987

 

Table 5: Showing the malaria parasite density of different age groups using 8,000/mm3 as the total WBC count.

Age

100

200

400

800

F/P values

T14 <5yrs

3915+

3790+

3297+

3901+

F = 0.1757

2479

2364

1305

3694

P = 0.9124

T15 5 – 15yrs

7460+

8238+

8286+

8997+

F = 0.1429

5910

6578

7546

9261

P = 0.9339

T16 >15yrs

3111+

3456+

3448+

3651+

F = 0.2090

1786

1969

2252

3718

P = 0.8899

 

Table 6: Malaria parasite density for age range (<5yrs) using different values as the total WBC counts.

No of WBC Counted

6000/mm3

7,500/mm3

8,000/mm3

Actual/mm3

100

2931+

3664+

3909+

7617+

 

1858

2323

2478

10,055

200

2846+

3557+

3794+

7316+

 

1773

2216

2364

9417

400

2473+

3091+

3297+

5622+

 

979

1223

1305

4889

800

2926+

3658+

3901+

7892+

 

2771

3464

3694

13209

 

F = 47.69, P<0.0001

 

 

 

 

(Table 7) Shows the malaria parasite density for patients in the age range 5 –15yrs using different total WBC counts (6,000/mm3, 7,500/mm3, 8,000/mm3 and actual total WBC count respectively). Its analysis of variance showed a significant difference (F = 30.85, P<0.0001) in the different estimations of parasite density.

 

(Table 8) Represents the malaria parasite density for patients in the age range >15yrs using different total WBC counts (6,000/mm3, 7,500/mm3, 8,000/mm3 and the actual total WBC count respectively). The analysis of variance showed no significant difference (F = 15.25, P = 0.0002) in the estimation of parasite density.

 

Table 7: Malaria parasite density for the age range (5 – 15 yrs) using different values as the total WBC counts.

No of WBC Counted

6000/mm3

7,500/mm3

8,000/mm3

Actual/mm3

100

5595+4433

6994+5541

7460+5910

9617+11,432

200

6175+4934

7723+6167

8238+6578

10,752+12,678

400

6215+5660

7768+7075

8286+7546

10,974+13,780

800

6748+6946

8435+8682

8997+9261

12,039+16,150

 

F = 30.85, P<0.0001

 

 

 

 

Table 8: Malaria parasite density for the age range (>15yrs) using different value as the total WBC count.

No of WBC Counted

6000/mm3

7,500/mm3

8,000/mm3

Actual/mm3

100

2333+1339

2917+1674

3111+1786

2550+2015

200

2592+1477

3241+1846

3456+1969

2803+2041

400

2594+1704

3233+2111

3448+2252

2802+2316

800

2738+2788

3423+3485

3651+3718

3001+3472

 

F = 15.25, P<0.0002

 

 

 

 

5. Discussion

Malaria is a life-threatening parasitic disease transmitted by mosquitoes and caused by the specie of the genius plasmodium. Four species infect man; P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. ovale and P. malariae1.

 

From my findings, there was a significant correlation (Pearson(r) =0.6664, P<0.0001) between malaria parasite count and the total white blood cell count of all the age groups (<5yrs, 5-15yrs and >15yrs). There was a significant decrease (F = 9.988, P = 0.0002) in the total white blood cell count from patients <5yrs to >15yrs (Table 1). There was no significant change when the mean values and standard deviation of the malaria parasite density of the different age groups using the actual WBC counts (after reading 100, 200, 400 and 800 WBC respectively). Also, there was no significant variations was noticed in malaria parasite densities among different age groups using 6,000/mm3, 7,500/mm3 and 8,000/mm3 and the actual WBC count respectively, there was a significant difference (F = 47.69, P<0.001). The analysis of variance of patients in the age range 5-15yrs showed a significant difference (F = 30.85, P<0.0001) when different total WBC counts of 6,000/mm3, 7,500/mm3 and 8,000/mm3 and the actual were used respectively.

 

Those of age range >15yrs showed no significant difference. The most widely used method of parasite density determination based on the assumed average total WBC count, gave incorrect counts in malaria patients4,15. Assuming that counting of parasite against the WBC in the blood smear and consequent number of PRBC/WBC was correct, the probable cause of this error is the deviation of WBC counts in patients5,15. Therefore, this agree with Dubey, et al., 1999 that when the parasite densities were calculated based on the actual WBC counts of each patient, the error will be eliminated and more accurate parasite densities obtained16-20.

 

6. Conclusion

It can be concluded from the results of this study that based on the average WBC count of 8,000/mm3 was most unsatisfactory for determining parasite density in most clinical situations. The number of parasites per total WBC and the actual WBC count was found to be the most accurate.

 

7. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the management of University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria for creating the enabling environment for this study. Thanks to all the Laboratory and technical staff of St Kenny Research Consult, Ekpoma, Edo State, Nigeria for their excellent assistance and for providing medical writing support/editorial support in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP3) guidelines. 

7.1. Disclosure of conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and the writing of the paper.

7.2. Statement of ethical approval
Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics and research committee of Asokoro District Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria, and informed consent of the patients was obtained before sample collection.

7.3. Funding
This research did not receive any grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

7.4. Availability of data and materials

The authors declare consent for all available data present in this study.

7.5. Authors’ Contribution
The entire study procedure was conducted with the involvement of all writers. 

7.6. Statement of informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. 

8. References

1.      Godal T, Najera J. Malaria in Tropicl diseases - WHO, Geneva (Switzerland), 1990;139: 4-5.

2.      World Health Organisation, 1990.

3.     Paul B, Delley V, Breslow N, et al. What does a single determination of malaria parasite density mean? A longitudinal survey in Mali; Tropical Medicine and           International Health, 2000;5(6): 404.

4.     Iyevhobu KO. Assessment of the Co-existence of Typhoidal Antibodies and Malaria Parasitaemia among Pregnant Women. Gulf Journal of Clinical Medicine and  Medical Research, 2020;1(1): 06-11.

5.    Ebadan MI, Obodo BN, Amiegheme FE, et al. Prevalence and Susceptibility of Malaria Parasite Infection in Association with Blood Group and Haemoglobin Genotype Polymorphism in Pregnancy. International Journal Community Research, 2017;6(2): 2-8.

6.     Omolumen LE, Obodo BN, Iyevhobu KO, et al. Assessment of some Nutritional Indices of children with Malaria In relation to burden and severity of infections in    Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital, Irrua, Edo State. International Journal of Basic, Applied and Innovative Research, 2020;9(1): 15-22.

7.      Dacie JV, Lewis SM. Practical Haematology; 6th edition; London. Churchill livingstone, 1985.

8.   Falade CO, Salako LA, Sowunmi A, et al. Comparative efficacy of Halofantrine, Chloroquine and Sulfadoxine - Pyrimethamine for treatment of acute uncomplicated Falciparum malaria in Nigeria children; Trans. Of the Royal Soc. Of Trop. Medicine and Hyg, 1997;91: 58-62.

9.    Drissa C, Dappa AD, Mahamadou AT, et al. Impact of preseason treatment on incidence of falciparum malaria and parasite density at a site for testing malaria   vaccines in Badiagara, mali; Am. J. Trop. Med. And Hyg, 2002;67(6): 604-610.

10.   van Eijk AM, Ayisi JG, Ter Kuile FO, et al. Risk factors for malaria in pregnancy in an urban and peri-urban population in Western Kenya; Trans of Royal. Soc. Of    Trop. Medicine and Hygiene, 2002;96: 586-592.

11.   D’Allessandro U, Olaleye B, McGuire W, et al. Mortality and Morbidity from malaria in Gambia children after introduction of an impregnated bed net programme.    Lancet, 1995;345: 479-483.

12.  World Health Organization/Pan American Health Organization. Evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of medicines for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium  falciparum malaria in the Americas. WHO/PAHO/HCP/113/98 (Spanish), HO/PAHO 113/98, 1998: 2-34.

13.   Warhurst DC, JE. Laboratory diagnosis of malaria; J. Clin. Pathol, 1996;49: 533-538.

14.   Cheesbrough M. Haematological tests: In district laboratory practice in trbroughopical countries; part 2, 2000: 314-333.

15.   Dubey ML, Chenglen W, Ganguly NK, Maha Jan RC. Comparative evaluation of methods of parasite density determination in blood sample from patients and experimental animals. Indimjournal of Medical Research, 1999;109: 20-27.

16.   Cheesbrough M. Malaria parasites: In Medical Laboratory manual for Tropical countries, 1987;1: 223.

17.   D’Allessandro U, Leach A, Drakeley C, et al. Efficacy trial of malaria vaccine SPf66 in Gambia infants. Lancet, 1995;346: 462-467.

18.   FMOH, Nigeria 1980-1983; Annual reports Lagos; Federal Ministry of Health.

19.  Iyevhobu KO, Obodo BN, Irobonosen OI, et al. Assessment of the Prevalence of Malaria and Typhoid Fever among Apparently Healthy Undergraduates. International Journal of Healthcare and Medical Sciences, 2021;7(2): 13-17.

20.   Silverton R, Baker F, Pallister C. Blood collection and microscopic study (Romanowsky stains): In Introduction to Medical Laboratory Technology; 7th edition, 1998: 348-350.